You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwhisk.apache.org by David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com> on 2021/06/05 00:33:37 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
"David P Grove" <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 05/03/2021 11:40:08 AM:
>
> We did our first unified release (OpenWhisk 20.11) at the end of
November.
>
> Since then, we've released new versions of most of the runtimes and also
of
> the CLI.
>
> I think getting into a rhythm of doing a unified release every 6 months
(eg
> May and November) would be a good discipline for us.
>
> The actual 21.05 unified release itself is not very much work. But, we
> would need to push out a core OpenWhisk release (1.1?) to prepare. Is
> doing that in May a reasonable goal?
>
Well, May went by fast :)
Is a core OpenWhisk release in June feasible? I know there has been a
fair amount of activity, but I don't have a good sense of whether it is
converging on a good point to release or not.
--dave
Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
Posted by Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>.
I wrote up my suggested workaround in
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5132.
-r
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:20 PM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool. I can take it I already as I am looking through other libraries.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jun 10, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Tyson Norris <tn...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest removing MesosContainerFactory and dependencies on
> mesos-actor. We are not using it, and I’m sure nobody else is either.
> > If you already have changed to accommodate this, feel free to add it,
> otherwise I can create a PR just for this.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Tyson
> >
> > From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 8:14 AM
> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <de...@openwhisk.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
> > A number of these dependencies are coming from
> > com.adobe.api.platform.runtime:mesos-actor:0.0.17. I tried a more recent
> > version 0.0.25 (still from 2019 though) and that does not resolve the
> > dependency issue.
> >
> > Is there still a need for the mesos actor library?
> > I am tracking down one other conflicting dependency.
> >
> > -r
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "David P Grove" <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 06/04/2021 08:33:37 PM:
> >>>
> >>> Well, May went by fast :)
> >>>
> >>> Is a core OpenWhisk release in June feasible? I know there has been a
> >>> fair amount of activity, but I don't have a good sense of whether it is
> >>> converging on a good point to release or not.
> >>>
> >>> --dave
> >>
> >> The upgrade in akka versions in the core repository broke all the
> >> downstream repos that consume the test suite from the core.
> >>
> >> Therefore, we can't do a unified release unless we either:
> >> (a) branch the core repo prior to this change
> >> or (b) fix all of downstream repos and then do a release wave.
> >>
> >> That combined with Dominic's comments on the status of the scheduler
> >> changes suggests we are probably looking at a 21.08 in August
> >> as the earliest possible unified release.
> >>
> >> --dave
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
Posted by Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>.
Cool. I can take it I already as I am looking through other libraries.
-r
> On Jun 10, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Tyson Norris <tn...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> I would suggest removing MesosContainerFactory and dependencies on mesos-actor. We are not using it, and I’m sure nobody else is either.
> If you already have changed to accommodate this, feel free to add it, otherwise I can create a PR just for this.
>
> Thanks
> Tyson
>
> From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 8:14 AM
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <de...@openwhisk.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
> A number of these dependencies are coming from
> com.adobe.api.platform.runtime:mesos-actor:0.0.17. I tried a more recent
> version 0.0.25 (still from 2019 though) and that does not resolve the
> dependency issue.
>
> Is there still a need for the mesos actor library?
> I am tracking down one other conflicting dependency.
>
> -r
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> "David P Grove" <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 06/04/2021 08:33:37 PM:
>>>
>>> Well, May went by fast :)
>>>
>>> Is a core OpenWhisk release in June feasible? I know there has been a
>>> fair amount of activity, but I don't have a good sense of whether it is
>>> converging on a good point to release or not.
>>>
>>> --dave
>>
>> The upgrade in akka versions in the core repository broke all the
>> downstream repos that consume the test suite from the core.
>>
>> Therefore, we can't do a unified release unless we either:
>> (a) branch the core repo prior to this change
>> or (b) fix all of downstream repos and then do a release wave.
>>
>> That combined with Dominic's comments on the status of the scheduler
>> changes suggests we are probably looking at a 21.08 in August
>> as the earliest possible unified release.
>>
>> --dave
>>
Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
Posted by Tyson Norris <tn...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I would suggest removing MesosContainerFactory and dependencies on mesos-actor. We are not using it, and I’m sure nobody else is either.
If you already have changed to accommodate this, feel free to add it, otherwise I can create a PR just for this.
Thanks
Tyson
From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 8:14 AM
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <de...@openwhisk.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
A number of these dependencies are coming from
com.adobe.api.platform.runtime:mesos-actor:0.0.17. I tried a more recent
version 0.0.25 (still from 2019 though) and that does not resolve the
dependency issue.
Is there still a need for the mesos actor library?
I am tracking down one other conflicting dependency.
-r
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> "David P Grove" <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 06/04/2021 08:33:37 PM:
> >
> > Well, May went by fast :)
> >
> > Is a core OpenWhisk release in June feasible? I know there has been a
> > fair amount of activity, but I don't have a good sense of whether it is
> > converging on a good point to release or not.
> >
> > --dave
>
> The upgrade in akka versions in the core repository broke all the
> downstream repos that consume the test suite from the core.
>
> Therefore, we can't do a unified release unless we either:
> (a) branch the core repo prior to this change
> or (b) fix all of downstream repos and then do a release wave.
>
> That combined with Dominic's comments on the status of the scheduler
> changes suggests we are probably looking at a 21.08 in August
> as the earliest possible unified release.
>
> --dave
>
Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
Posted by Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>.
A number of these dependencies are coming from
com.adobe.api.platform.runtime:mesos-actor:0.0.17. I tried a more recent
version 0.0.25 (still from 2019 though) and that does not resolve the
dependency issue.
Is there still a need for the mesos actor library?
I am tracking down one other conflicting dependency.
-r
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> "David P Grove" <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 06/04/2021 08:33:37 PM:
> >
> > Well, May went by fast :)
> >
> > Is a core OpenWhisk release in June feasible? I know there has been a
> > fair amount of activity, but I don't have a good sense of whether it is
> > converging on a good point to release or not.
> >
> > --dave
>
> The upgrade in akka versions in the core repository broke all the
> downstream repos that consume the test suite from the core.
>
> Therefore, we can't do a unified release unless we either:
> (a) branch the core repo prior to this change
> or (b) fix all of downstream repos and then do a release wave.
>
> That combined with Dominic's comments on the status of the scheduler
> changes suggests we are probably looking at a 21.08 in August
> as the earliest possible unified release.
>
> --dave
>
RE: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
Posted by David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com>.
"David P Grove" <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 06/04/2021 08:33:37 PM:
>
> Well, May went by fast :)
>
> Is a core OpenWhisk release in June feasible? I know there has been a
> fair amount of activity, but I don't have a good sense of whether it is
> converging on a good point to release or not.
>
> --dave
The upgrade in akka versions in the core repository broke all the
downstream repos that consume the test suite from the core.
Therefore, we can't do a unified release unless we either:
(a) branch the core repo prior to this change
or (b) fix all of downstream repos and then do a release wave.
That combined with Dominic's comments on the status of the scheduler
changes suggests we are probably looking at a 21.08 in August
as the earliest possible unified release.
--dave
Re: [DISCUSS} OpenWhisk 21.05 / OpenWhisk 1.1
Posted by Dominic Kim <st...@gmail.com>.
+1 to release the core module.
One concern is, a contribution of the new scheduler is in progress now.
If we can still release the core OpenWhisk along with ongoing components,
it would be fine.
But if we must include a complete set of components into the release, we
may have to wait until the contribution is over.
There are 5 open PRs, 3 waiting components remaining according to this
schedule [1].
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Component+Design
2021년 6월 5일 (토) 오전 9:42, David P Grove <gr...@us.ibm.com>님이 작성:
>
>
> "David P Grove" <gr...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 05/03/2021 11:40:08 AM:
> >
> > We did our first unified release (OpenWhisk 20.11) at the end of
> November.
> >
> > Since then, we've released new versions of most of the runtimes and also
> of
> > the CLI.
> >
> > I think getting into a rhythm of doing a unified release every 6 months
> (eg
> > May and November) would be a good discipline for us.
> >
> > The actual 21.05 unified release itself is not very much work. But, we
> > would need to push out a core OpenWhisk release (1.1?) to prepare. Is
> > doing that in May a reasonable goal?
> >
>
> Well, May went by fast :)
>
> Is a core OpenWhisk release in June feasible? I know there has been a
> fair amount of activity, but I don't have a good sense of whether it is
> converging on a good point to release or not.
>
> --dave
>