You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Jim Alateras <ji...@comware.com.au> on 2007/04/19 03:44:09 UTC
Ack'ing persistent messages
If i synchronously retrieve messages of a persistent queue and i only ack
the last message will that implicitly ack all the other messages that have
come before....or do i need to ack each message explicitly
cheers
</jima>
Re: Ack'ing persistent messages
Posted by Jim Alateras <ji...@comware.com.au>.
James Strachan wrote:
> Try turning on debug logging.
anything specific.
>
> If you could provide a JUnit test case for what you're doing it always
> helps
will do early next week
cheers
</jima>
Re: Ack'ing persistent messages
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Try turning on debug logging.
If you could provide a JUnit test case for what you're doing it always helps
On 4/20/07, Jim Alateras <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This doesn't seem to be working. I am using persistent queues in a
> non-transacted session. What log4j settings should i set to see what is
> happening.
>
> cheers
> </jima>
>
>
> On 4/19/07, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/19/07, Jim Alateras <ji...@comware.com.au> wrote:
> > > If i synchronously retrieve messages of a persistent queue and i only
> > ack
> > > the last message will that implicitly ack all the other messages that
> > have
> > > come before....or do i need to ack each message explicitly
> >
> > Acking the last message delivered should work
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
>
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Re: Ack'ing persistent messages
Posted by Jim Alateras <ja...@gmail.com>.
This doesn't seem to be working. I am using persistent queues in a
non-transacted session. What log4j settings should i set to see what is
happening.
cheers
</jima>
On 4/19/07, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/19/07, Jim Alateras <ji...@comware.com.au> wrote:
> > If i synchronously retrieve messages of a persistent queue and i only
> ack
> > the last message will that implicitly ack all the other messages that
> have
> > come before....or do i need to ack each message explicitly
>
> Acking the last message delivered should work
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
Re: Ack'ing persistent messages
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 4/19/07, Jim Alateras <ji...@comware.com.au> wrote:
> If i synchronously retrieve messages of a persistent queue and i only ack
> the last message will that implicitly ack all the other messages that have
> come before....or do i need to ack each message explicitly
Acking the last message delivered should work
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/