schema.xml compatibility

[Teruhiko Kurosaka <Ku...@basistech.com>]

I've noticed that schema.xml in the dev version of Solr spells
what used to be fieldtype as fieldType with capital T.

Are there any other compatibility issues between the would-be 
Solr 1.3 and Solr 1.2?

How soon Solr 1.3 will be available, by the way?

--------
Basis Technology Corporation, San Francisco
T. "Kuro" Kurosaka

Re: schema.xml compatibility

[Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>]

: > Are there any other compatibility issues between the would-be
: > Solr 1.3 and Solr 1.2?
: 
: It shouldn't be a compatibility issue since both will be accepted.

Note that the example configs tend to represent the latest/greatest syntax 
& features, but existing configs should generally continue to work as is 
when upgrading -- if anything changes are made in Solr that might impact 
people with old configs when upgrading a special note will be found in the 
"Upgrading from Solr 1.XXX" section of the release notes.  (such as the 
comment about the <httpCaching> directive in the "Upgrading from Solr 1.2" 
section, and about the json.nl=map option for JSON in "Upgrading from Solr 
1.1")



-Hoss

Re: schema.xml compatibility

[Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org>]

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Teruhiko Kurosaka <Ku...@basistech.com> wrote:
> I've noticed that schema.xml in the dev version of Solr spells
> what used to be fieldtype as fieldType with capital T.
>
> Are there any other compatibility issues between the would-be
> Solr 1.3 and Solr 1.2?

It shouldn't be a compatibility issue since both will be accepted.
The xpath used to select fieldType nodes is
"/schema/types/fieldtype | /schema/types/fieldType"

> How soon Solr 1.3 will be available, by the way?

Hopefully soon... perhaps the end of the month.

-Yonik