You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2021/04/20 07:00:00 UTC
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
- Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
- fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
- fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
- improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
The Maven staging repository is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
The dist staging repository is:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
Git tag:
activemq-5.15.15
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1
Jon
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed
> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15
> release.
>
> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf
> http commands and refresh
> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.15
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 validated against internal test suites
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 2:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
>
> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.15
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
Cheers,
Jamie
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 2:49 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 20 avr. 2021 à 09:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
> >
> > This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> > - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> > - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> > - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
> > - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
> >
> > The dist staging repository is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.15
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
> Le 20 avr. 2021 à 09:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
>
> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.15
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by "Nevezhyn, Roman" <ni...@amazon.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding)
All of our acceptance tests passed for ActiveMQ 5.15.15. Can't wait to see it in public!
Thanks
--
Roman Nevezhyn
Software Development Engineer II, Amazon MQ
email: nieviezh@amazon.com
On 2021-04-20, 12:44 PM, "Chen, Charlie" <ch...@amazon.com> wrote:
On 2021-04-20, 12:02 PM, "Matt Pavlovich" <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
+1 do the release, and we can stagger the announcements.
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I don’t see any real reason to delay the release anymore. Let’s get it out.
>
> Dan
>
>
>> On Apr 20, 2021, at 3:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
>>
>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>>
>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>
>>
>> The Maven staging repository is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>>
>> The dist staging repository is:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>>
>> Git tag:
>> activemq-5.15.15
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org <ma...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog>
> Talend - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 do the release, and we can stagger the announcements.
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I don’t see any real reason to delay the release anymore. Let’s get it out.
>
> Dan
>
>
>> On Apr 20, 2021, at 3:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
>>
>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>>
>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>
>>
>> The Maven staging repository is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>>
>> The dist staging repository is:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>>
>> Git tag:
>> activemq-5.15.15
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org <ma...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog>
> Talend - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
+1
I don’t see any real reason to delay the release anymore. Let’s get it out.
Dan
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 3:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
>
> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.15
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org <ma...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog>
Talend - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi everyone,
This vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Chris Shannon, Michael Andrea Pearce, JB Onofré
+1 (non binding): Matt Pavlovich, Roman Nevezhyn, Jon Gallimore, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear
I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist, update website. I will prepare the announcement, waiting 5.16.2 completed.
Thanks all for your vote.
Regards
JB
> Le 20 avr. 2021 à 09:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15 release.
>
> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf http commands and refresh
> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.15
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Also tested as a Windows Service with JDK 16 on Windows 10. I've opened up
a PR for main as well: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/651 - happy
for PR #650 to be closed and this one cherry-picked if you prefer.
Jon
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:05 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> I opened a PR for AMQ-8220: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/650.
>
> Tested with Java 11 and 16 on Mac. Will also test on Windows with the same.
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
>> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
>> > with? Happy to try and help.
>> >
>> > Jon
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
>> > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I
>> think
>> > > it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and
>> announcing
>> > > together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
>> > everything
>> > > checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at
>> this
>> > > point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
>> > > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
>> > > >
>> > > > We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
>> > released
>> > > > first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
>> > > Robbie
>> > > > has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it
>> before
>> > > was a
>> > > > blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16
>> support
>> > is
>> > > > not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can
>> just
>> > > be
>> > > > done first and then do 5.16.2.
>> > > >
>> > > > The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
>> > > > branch.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
>> jb@nanthrax.net>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hi everyone,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
>> > fixed
>> > > >> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
>> > 5.15.15
>> > > >> release.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
>> > > >> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
>> > > >> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
>> > > >> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking
>> Karaf
>> > > >> http commands and refresh
>> > > >> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
>> > > >> processing
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The Maven staging repository is:
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>> > > >> <
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The dist staging repository is:
>> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/
>> <
>> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Git tag:
>> > > >> activemq-5.15.15
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Please vote to approve this release:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > > >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks !
>> > > >> Regards
>> > > >> JB
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by "michael.andre.pearce" <mi...@me.com.INVALID>.
+1 (Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------From: Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com> Date: 21/04/2021 15:04 (GMT+00:00) To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3) +1, everything looks good to me.On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:> Hi,>> Thanks, just commented on the PR: I already had quite the same fix ready> (as I said previously on this thread).>> I revert my local change to take yours.>> Regards> JB>> > Le 20 avr. 2021 à 21:05, Jonathan Gallimore <> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> a écrit :> >> > I opened a PR for AMQ-8220: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/650.> >> > Tested with Java 11 and 16 on Mac. Will also test on Windows with the> same.> >> > Jon> >> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <> > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:> >> >> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until> >> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.> >>> >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <> >> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:> >>> >>> Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out> >>> with? Happy to try and help.> >>>> >>> Jon> >>>> >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <> >>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:> >>>> >>>> Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I> think> >>>> it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and> announcing> >>>> together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if> >>> everything> >>>> checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at> >> this> >>>> point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <> >>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:> >>>>> >>>>> I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.> >>>>>> >>>>> We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be> >>> released> >>>>> first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.> >>>> Robbie> >>>>> has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before> >>>> was a> >>>>> blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support> >>> is> >>>>> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can> >> just> >>>> be> >>>>> done first and then do 5.16.2.> >>>>>> >>>>> The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x> >>>>> branch.> >>>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <> >> jb@nanthrax.net>> >>>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone,> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We> >>> fixed> >>>>>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on> >>> 5.15.15> >>>>>> release.> >>>>>>> >>>>>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:> >>>>>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades> >>>>>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +> >>>>>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking> >> Karaf> >>>>>> http commands and refresh> >>>>>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack> >>>>>> processing> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The Maven staging repository is:> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/> >>>>>> <> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The dist staging repository is:> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Git tag:> >>>>>> activemq-5.15.15> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:> >>>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)> >>>>>>> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks !> >>>>>> Regards> >>>>>> JB> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1, everything looks good to me.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, just commented on the PR: I already had quite the same fix ready
> (as I said previously on this thread).
>
> I revert my local change to take yours.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 20 avr. 2021 à 21:05, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > I opened a PR for AMQ-8220: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/650.
> >
> > Tested with Java 11 and 16 on Mac. Will also test on Windows with the
> same.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
> >> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
> >>> with? Happy to try and help.
> >>>
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
> >>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I
> think
> >>>> it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and
> announcing
> >>>> together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
> >>> everything
> >>>> checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at
> >> this
> >>>> point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
> >>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
> >>> released
> >>>>> first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
> >>>> Robbie
> >>>>> has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
> >>>> was a
> >>>>> blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support
> >>> is
> >>>>> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can
> >> just
> >>>> be
> >>>>> done first and then do 5.16.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
> >>>>> branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> >> jb@nanthrax.net>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
> >>> fixed
> >>>>>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
> >>> 5.15.15
> >>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> >>>>>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> >>>>>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> >>>>>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking
> >> Karaf
> >>>>>> http commands and refresh
> >>>>>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
> >>>>>> processing
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The dist staging repository is:
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Git tag:
> >>>>>> activemq-5.15.15
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks !
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> JB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi,
Thanks, just commented on the PR: I already had quite the same fix ready (as I said previously on this thread).
I revert my local change to take yours.
Regards
JB
> Le 20 avr. 2021 à 21:05, Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> I opened a PR for AMQ-8220: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/650.
>
> Tested with Java 11 and 16 on Mac. Will also test on Windows with the same.
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
>> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
>>> with? Happy to try and help.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I think
>>>> it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and announcing
>>>> together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
>>> everything
>>>> checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at
>> this
>>>> point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
>>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
>>> released
>>>>> first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
>>>> Robbie
>>>>> has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
>>>> was a
>>>>> blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support
>>> is
>>>>> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can
>> just
>>>> be
>>>>> done first and then do 5.16.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
>>>>> branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
>> jb@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
>>> fixed
>>>>>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
>>> 5.15.15
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
>>>>>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
>>>>>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
>>>>>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking
>> Karaf
>>>>>> http commands and refresh
>>>>>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
>>>>>> processing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Git tag:
>>>>>> activemq-5.15.15
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
I opened a PR for AMQ-8220: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/650.
Tested with Java 11 and 16 on Mac. Will also test on Windows with the same.
Jon
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
> > with? Happy to try and help.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I think
> > > it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and announcing
> > > together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
> > everything
> > > checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at
> this
> > > point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
> > > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
> > > >
> > > > We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
> > released
> > > > first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
> > > Robbie
> > > > has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
> > > was a
> > > > blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support
> > is
> > > > not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can
> just
> > > be
> > > > done first and then do 5.16.2.
> > > >
> > > > The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
> > > > branch.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> jb@nanthrax.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
> > fixed
> > > >> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
> > 5.15.15
> > > >> release.
> > > >>
> > > >> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> > > >> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> > > >> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> > > >> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking
> Karaf
> > > >> http commands and refresh
> > > >> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
> > > >> processing
> > > >>
> > > >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The Maven staging repository is:
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> The dist staging repository is:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
> > > >>
> > > >> Git tag:
> > > >> activemq-5.15.15
> > > >>
> > > >> Please vote to approve this release:
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > > >>
> > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks !
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> JB
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
Vote tomorrow sounds good on 5.16.2. I'll review both at the same time
since they have similar fixes.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:38 AM JB Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> To provide you context:
>
> 1. After two takes, I think it makes sense to finalize 5.15.15 with take 3
> 2. 5.15.15 is expected by users (we had a message on the mailing list)
> 3. 5.16.2 is almost ready (I’m doing tests now). I will submit it to vote
> tomorrow (my time).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 20 avr. 2021 à 15:15, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > I can find some time to have a go with that today. If its just an
> > --add-opens needed then it sounds straightforward enough. If it's more
> > complicated, I agree, I'd be in favour of doing the release and fixing
> this
> > right after.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <
> >> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
> >> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
> >>> with? Happy to try and help.
> >>>
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
> >>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I
> think
> >>>> it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and
> announcing
> >>>> together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
> >>> everything
> >>>> checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at
> >> this
> >>>> point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
> >>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
> >>> released
> >>>>> first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
> >>>> Robbie
> >>>>> has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
> >>>> was a
> >>>>> blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support
> >>> is
> >>>>> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can
> >> just
> >>>> be
> >>>>> done first and then do 5.16.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
> >>>>> branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> >> jb@nanthrax.net>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
> >>> fixed
> >>>>>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
> >>> 5.15.15
> >>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> >>>>>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> >>>>>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> >>>>>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking
> >> Karaf
> >>>>>> http commands and refresh
> >>>>>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
> >>>>>> processing
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The dist staging repository is:
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Git tag:
> >>>>>> activemq-5.15.15
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks !
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> JB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by JB Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys
To provide you context:
1. After two takes, I think it makes sense to finalize 5.15.15 with take 3
2. 5.15.15 is expected by users (we had a message on the mailing list)
3. 5.16.2 is almost ready (I’m doing tests now). I will submit it to vote tomorrow (my time).
Regards
JB
> Le 20 avr. 2021 à 15:15, Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> I can find some time to have a go with that today. If its just an
> --add-opens needed then it sounds straightforward enough. If it's more
> complicated, I agree, I'd be in favour of doing the release and fixing this
> right after.
>
> Jon
>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <
>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
>> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
>>> with? Happy to try and help.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I think
>>>> it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and announcing
>>>> together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
>>> everything
>>>> checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at
>> this
>>>> point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
>>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
>>> released
>>>>> first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
>>>> Robbie
>>>>> has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
>>>> was a
>>>>> blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support
>>> is
>>>>> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can
>> just
>>>> be
>>>>> done first and then do 5.16.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
>>>>> branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
>> jb@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
>>> fixed
>>>>>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
>>> 5.15.15
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
>>>>>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
>>>>>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
>>>>>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking
>> Karaf
>>>>>> http commands and refresh
>>>>>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
>>>>>> processing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Git tag:
>>>>>> activemq-5.15.15
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
I can find some time to have a go with that today. If its just an
--add-opens needed then it sounds straightforward enough. If it's more
complicated, I agree, I'd be in favour of doing the release and fixing this
right after.
Jon
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
> > with? Happy to try and help.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I think
> > > it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and announcing
> > > together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
> > everything
> > > checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at
> this
> > > point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
> > > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
> > > >
> > > > We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
> > released
> > > > first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
> > > Robbie
> > > > has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
> > > was a
> > > > blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support
> > is
> > > > not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can
> just
> > > be
> > > > done first and then do 5.16.2.
> > > >
> > > > The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
> > > > branch.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> jb@nanthrax.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
> > fixed
> > > >> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
> > 5.15.15
> > > >> release.
> > > >>
> > > >> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> > > >> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> > > >> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> > > >> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking
> Karaf
> > > >> http commands and refresh
> > > >> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
> > > >> processing
> > > >>
> > > >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The Maven staging repository is:
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> The dist staging repository is:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
> > > >>
> > > >> Git tag:
> > > >> activemq-5.15.15
> > > >>
> > > >> Please vote to approve this release:
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > > >>
> > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks !
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> JB
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until
5.16.3 so we can get it out.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
> with? Happy to try and help.
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I think
> > it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and announcing
> > together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if
> everything
> > checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at this
> > point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
> > >
> > > We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be
> released
> > > first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
> > Robbie
> > > has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
> > was a
> > > blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support
> is
> > > not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can just
> > be
> > > done first and then do 5.16.2.
> > >
> > > The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
> > > branch.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We
> fixed
> > >> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on
> 5.15.15
> > >> release.
> > >>
> > >> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> > >> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> > >> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> > >> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf
> > >> http commands and refresh
> > >> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
> > >> processing
> > >>
> > >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The Maven staging repository is:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> The dist staging repository is:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
> > >>
> > >> Git tag:
> > >> activemq-5.15.15
> > >>
> > >> Please vote to approve this release:
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >>
> > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks !
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out
with? Happy to try and help.
Jon
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I think
> it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and announcing
> together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if everything
> checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at this
> point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
> >
> > We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be released
> > first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.
> Robbie
> > has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before
> was a
> > blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support is
> > not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can just
> be
> > done first and then do 5.16.2.
> >
> > The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
> > branch.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed
> >> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15
> >> release.
> >>
> >> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> >> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> >> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> >> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf
> >> http commands and refresh
> >> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
> >> processing
> >>
> >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>
> >>
> >> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >> <
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >> >
> >>
> >> The dist staging repository is:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
> >>
> >> Git tag:
> >> activemq-5.15.15
> >>
> >> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I think
it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and announcing
together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if everything
checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at this
point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
>
> We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be released
> first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions. Robbie
> has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before was a
> blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support is
> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can just be
> done first and then do 5.16.2.
>
> The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x
> branch.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed
>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15
>> release.
>>
>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf
>> http commands and refresh
>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
>> processing
>>
>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>
>>
>> The Maven staging repository is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
>> >
>>
>> The dist staging repository is:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>>
>> Git tag:
>> activemq-5.15.15
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.
We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be released
first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions. Robbie
has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before was a
blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support is
not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can just be
done first and then do 5.16.2.
The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x branch.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We fixed
> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on 5.15.15
> release.
>
> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf
> http commands and refresh
> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack processing
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/
> >
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.15
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB