You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2014/04/15 21:21:33 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1587650 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On Apr 15, 2014, at 1:51 PM, ylavic@apache.org wrote:
>
> PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> @@ -136,6 +179,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> 2.4.x patch: trunk works
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/uds-rewrite.patch
> +1: jim, humbedooh
> + -1: ylavic: still being worked on, see issues here in the following thread
> + https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg59276.html
>
I can't recall... isn't the issue still being worked an
additional aspect of mod_rewrite and UDS; that is, a new
behavior to be added (or handled) rather than a "broken"
behavior.
Re: svn commit: r1587650 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, didn't mean to vote -1, just wanted to add a note on the stuff
> being worked that could be integrated in the backport.
I am (re)working on this currently.
Re: svn commit: r1587650 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>.
Oh, didn't mean to vote -1, just wanted to add a note on the stuff
being worked that could be integrated in the backport.
I can make another proposal anyway, sorry for the noise.
Corrected in r1587758.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2014, at 1:51 PM, ylavic@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>> @@ -136,6 +179,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>> 2.4.x patch: trunk works
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/uds-rewrite.patch
>> +1: jim, humbedooh
>> + -1: ylavic: still being worked on, see issues here in the following thread
>> + https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg59276.html
>>
>
> I can't recall... isn't the issue still being worked an
> additional aspect of mod_rewrite and UDS; that is, a new
> behavior to be added (or handled) rather than a "broken"
> behavior.
>
Re: svn commit: r1587650 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Ruggeri <DR...@primary.net>.
On 4/15/2014 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I can't recall... isn't the issue still being worked an
> additional aspect of mod_rewrite and UDS; that is, a new
> behavior to be added (or handled) rather than a "broken"
> behavior.
That was my understanding, too
--
Daniel Ruggeri