You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> on 2019/05/20 01:19:21 UTC
[VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 7.0, as
follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2],
which are signed with the key with fingerprint
8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
* website pull request listing the new release [6].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
Thanks,
Jincheng
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
[5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
[6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
It always worked for netty, why would it no longer do so?
On 27/05/2019 11:22, Nico Kruber wrote:
> ok, agreed - I created a PR just in case another RC is needed anyway ;)
>
> This is not only about the shaded hadoop sources though...for me
> personally, it affects Netty - should affect anything we relocate
>
>
> On 27/05/2019 11:08, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> That would've been a good workaround, but RC3 is already out.
>>
>> I wouldn't wanna delay the release any further because of something one
>> can work around,
>> especially so since this only affects people who want the shaded hadoop
>> sources.
>> For this you'd probably get by with using the original ones anyway since
>> we aren't relocating hadoop classes.
>>
>> On 27/05/2019 10:50, Nico Kruber wrote:
>>> Honestly, I'm not sure whether FLINK-12598 should be treated as a
>>> blocker nonetheless: Although it does not affect the usage of
>>> flink-shaded, it may affect Flink + Flink job developers during bug
>>> hunting sessions where they need to debug into the source code. In this
>>> scenario, you'll definitely have to handle lots of different (local)
>>> maven versions and without the shaded sources, you don't really have a
>>> nice debugging experience.
>>>
>>> @chesnay: I do understand that bumping the maven-shade-plugin version
>>> requires a thorough investigation - maybe as a quicker, less risky
>>> solution (in order not to postpone the release any longer), we could
>>> bump the version only for the 'shade-sources' target?
>>>
>>>
>>> Nico
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24/05/2019 06:03, jincheng sun wrote:
>>>> I found we should also add the `slf4j-api` as a `provided` dependency
>>>> for `flink-shaded-hadoop-2`.
>>>>
>>>> @Nico, Thanks for your check, and
>>>> the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598> is not the blocker.
>>>>
>>>> @Chesnay, I remember where we already discussed this issue, the problems
>>>> caused by `provided` scope, and now, It seems nice to have added the
>>>> changes for the RC3!
>>>>
>>>> What do you think? @Chesnay Schepler <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> The PR can be found here: https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/64
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jincheng
>>>>
>>>> Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> 于2019
>>>> 年5月23日周四 下午5:29写道：
>>>>
>>>> I found another issue:
>>>>
>>>> 1. jackson is bundled twice in the uber jar.
>>>> 2. javax annotations are included in the slim&uber jar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for 1), I messed up and modified the shading patterns only for
>>>> hadoop-uber, resulting in 2 different shading patterns for jackson.
>>>> (jackson is pulled into both jars separately; once explicitly in
>>>> shaded-hadoop, and another time in shaded-hadoop-uber as a
>>>> transitive
>>>> dependency of avro)
>>>>
>>>> I've already fixed this on master.
>>>>
>>>> 2) happened because we didn't mark findbugs as provided like in the
>>>> main
>>>> project. I'm not quite sure why we aren't doing that, but I'm
>>>> not too
>>>> bothered by this being bundled. This kind of setups where we
>>>> rely on
>>>> Flink to provide certain dependencies are a bit brittle in general.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/05/2019 10:26, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>> > Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
>>>> >
>>>> > Which maven version are you using?
>>>> >
>>>> > On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
>>>> >> Thanks Jincheng,
>>>> >> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -1 (non-binding)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> # not working:
>>>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>>>> >>
>>>> >> # ok:
>>>> >> - checked release notes
>>>> >> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
>>>> >> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
>>>> >>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> - Release notes are correct.
>>>> >>> - Built from source archive successfully.
>>>> >>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
>>>> >>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been
>>>> >>> deployed to
>>>> >>> the maven central repository.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think
>>>> it is
>>>> not a
>>>> >>> blocker.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Best, Hequn
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun
>>>> <sunjincheng121@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the
>>>> version
>>>> >>>> 7.0, as
>>>> >>>> follows:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>> comments)
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> >>>> includes:
>>>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>>> >>>> [2],
>>>> >>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>> >>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
>>>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>> Repository [4],
>>>> >>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
>>>> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>> majority
>>>> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Thanks,
>>>> >>>> Jincheng
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> [1]
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> [2]
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
>>>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>> >>>> [4]
>>>> >>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
>>>> >>>> [5]
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
>>>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Nico Kruber <ni...@ververica.com>.
ok, agreed - I created a PR just in case another RC is needed anyway ;)
This is not only about the shaded hadoop sources though...for me
personally, it affects Netty - should affect anything we relocate
On 27/05/2019 11:08, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> That would've been a good workaround, but RC3 is already out.
>
> I wouldn't wanna delay the release any further because of something one
> can work around,
> especially so since this only affects people who want the shaded hadoop
> sources.
> For this you'd probably get by with using the original ones anyway since
> we aren't relocating hadoop classes.
>
> On 27/05/2019 10:50, Nico Kruber wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm not sure whether FLINK-12598 should be treated as a
>> blocker nonetheless: Although it does not affect the usage of
>> flink-shaded, it may affect Flink + Flink job developers during bug
>> hunting sessions where they need to debug into the source code. In this
>> scenario, you'll definitely have to handle lots of different (local)
>> maven versions and without the shaded sources, you don't really have a
>> nice debugging experience.
>>
>> @chesnay: I do understand that bumping the maven-shade-plugin version
>> requires a thorough investigation - maybe as a quicker, less risky
>> solution (in order not to postpone the release any longer), we could
>> bump the version only for the 'shade-sources' target?
>>
>>
>> Nico
>>
>>
>> On 24/05/2019 06:03, jincheng sun wrote:
>>> I found we should also add the `slf4j-api` as a `provided` dependency
>>> for `flink-shaded-hadoop-2`.
>>>
>>> @Nico, Thanks for your check, and
>>> the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598> is not the blocker.
>>>
>>> @Chesnay, I remember where we already discussed this issue, the problems
>>> caused by `provided` scope, and now, It seems nice to have added the
>>> changes for the RC3!
>>>
>>> What do you think? @Chesnay Schepler <ma...@apache.org>
>>>
>>> The PR can be found here: https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/64
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jincheng
>>>
>>> Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> 于2019
>>> 年5月23日周四 下午5:29写道：
>>>
>>> I found another issue:
>>>
>>> 1. jackson is bundled twice in the uber jar.
>>> 2. javax annotations are included in the slim&uber jar
>>>
>>>
>>> As for 1), I messed up and modified the shading patterns only for
>>> hadoop-uber, resulting in 2 different shading patterns for jackson.
>>> (jackson is pulled into both jars separately; once explicitly in
>>> shaded-hadoop, and another time in shaded-hadoop-uber as a
>>> transitive
>>> dependency of avro)
>>>
>>> I've already fixed this on master.
>>>
>>> 2) happened because we didn't mark findbugs as provided like in the
>>> main
>>> project. I'm not quite sure why we aren't doing that, but I'm
>>> not too
>>> bothered by this being bundled. This kind of setups where we
>>> rely on
>>> Flink to provide certain dependencies are a bit brittle in general.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/05/2019 10:26, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>> > Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
>>> >
>>> > Which maven version are you using?
>>> >
>>> > On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
>>> >> Thanks Jincheng,
>>> >> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
>>> >>
>>> >> -1 (non-binding)
>>> >>
>>> >> # not working:
>>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>>> >>
>>> >> # ok:
>>> >> - checked release notes
>>> >> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
>>> >> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
>>> >>
>>> >> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
>>> >>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Release notes are correct.
>>> >>> - Built from source archive successfully.
>>> >>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
>>> >>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been
>>> >>> deployed to
>>> >>> the maven central repository.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think
>>> it is
>>> not a
>>> >>> blocker.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best, Hequn
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun
>>> <sunjincheng121@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Hi everyone,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the
>>> version
>>> >>>> 7.0, as
>>> >>>> follows:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>> comments)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> >>>> includes:
>>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>> >>>> [2],
>>> >>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>>> >>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
>>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>> Repository [4],
>>> >>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
>>> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>> majority
>>> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>> Jincheng
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [1]
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>>>
>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [2]
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
>>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> >>>> [4]
>>> >>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
>>> >>>> [5]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
>>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>>> >>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>
--
Nico Kruber | Solutions Architect
Follow us @VervericaData Ververica
--
Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
--
Data Artisans GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
--
Data Artisans GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Dr. Kostas Tzoumas, Dr. Stephan Ewen
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
That would've been a good workaround, but RC3 is already out.
I wouldn't wanna delay the release any further because of something one
can work around,
especially so since this only affects people who want the shaded hadoop
sources.
For this you'd probably get by with using the original ones anyway since
we aren't relocating hadoop classes.
On 27/05/2019 10:50, Nico Kruber wrote:
> Honestly, I'm not sure whether FLINK-12598 should be treated as a
> blocker nonetheless: Although it does not affect the usage of
> flink-shaded, it may affect Flink + Flink job developers during bug
> hunting sessions where they need to debug into the source code. In this
> scenario, you'll definitely have to handle lots of different (local)
> maven versions and without the shaded sources, you don't really have a
> nice debugging experience.
>
> @chesnay: I do understand that bumping the maven-shade-plugin version
> requires a thorough investigation - maybe as a quicker, less risky
> solution (in order not to postpone the release any longer), we could
> bump the version only for the 'shade-sources' target?
>
>
> Nico
>
>
> On 24/05/2019 06:03, jincheng sun wrote:
>> I found we should also add the `slf4j-api` as a `provided` dependency
>> for `flink-shaded-hadoop-2`.
>>
>> @Nico, Thanks for your check, and
>> the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598> is not the blocker.
>>
>> @Chesnay, I remember where we already discussed this issue, the problems
>> caused by `provided` scope, and now, It seems nice to have added the
>> changes for the RC3!
>>
>> What do you think? @Chesnay Schepler <ma...@apache.org>
>>
>> The PR can be found here: https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/64
>>
>> Best,
>> Jincheng
>>
>> Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> 于2019
>> 年5月23日周四 下午5:29写道：
>>
>> I found another issue:
>>
>> 1. jackson is bundled twice in the uber jar.
>> 2. javax annotations are included in the slim&uber jar
>>
>>
>> As for 1), I messed up and modified the shading patterns only for
>> hadoop-uber, resulting in 2 different shading patterns for jackson.
>> (jackson is pulled into both jars separately; once explicitly in
>> shaded-hadoop, and another time in shaded-hadoop-uber as a transitive
>> dependency of avro)
>>
>> I've already fixed this on master.
>>
>> 2) happened because we didn't mark findbugs as provided like in the
>> main
>> project. I'm not quite sure why we aren't doing that, but I'm not too
>> bothered by this being bundled. This kind of setups where we rely on
>> Flink to provide certain dependencies are a bit brittle in general.
>>
>>
>> On 23/05/2019 10:26, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> > Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
>> >
>> > Which maven version are you using?
>> >
>> > On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
>> >> Thanks Jincheng,
>> >> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
>> >>
>> >> -1 (non-binding)
>> >>
>> >> # not working:
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>> >>
>> >> # ok:
>> >> - checked release notes
>> >> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
>> >> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
>> >>
>> >> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
>> >>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>>
>> >>> - Release notes are correct.
>> >>> - Built from source archive successfully.
>> >>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
>> >>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been
>> >>> deployed to
>> >>> the maven central repository.
>> >>>
>> >>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is
>> not a
>> >>> blocker.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best, Hequn
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun
>> <sunjincheng121@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>> >>>> 7.0, as
>> >>>> follows:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> comments)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> >>>> includes:
>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>> >>>> [2],
>> >>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>> >>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> >>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
>> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority
>> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Jincheng
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [2]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> >>>> [4]
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
>> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>> >>>>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Nico Kruber <ni...@ververica.com>.
Honestly, I'm not sure whether FLINK-12598 should be treated as a
blocker nonetheless: Although it does not affect the usage of
flink-shaded, it may affect Flink + Flink job developers during bug
hunting sessions where they need to debug into the source code. In this
scenario, you'll definitely have to handle lots of different (local)
maven versions and without the shaded sources, you don't really have a
nice debugging experience.
@chesnay: I do understand that bumping the maven-shade-plugin version
requires a thorough investigation - maybe as a quicker, less risky
solution (in order not to postpone the release any longer), we could
bump the version only for the 'shade-sources' target?
Nico
On 24/05/2019 06:03, jincheng sun wrote:
> I found we should also add the `slf4j-api` as a `provided` dependency
> for `flink-shaded-hadoop-2`.
>
> @Nico, Thanks for your check, and
> the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598> is not the blocker.
>
> @Chesnay, I remember where we already discussed this issue, the problems
> caused by `provided` scope, and now, It seems nice to have added the
> changes for the RC3!
>
> What do you think? @Chesnay Schepler <ma...@apache.org>
>
> The PR can be found here: https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/64
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> 于2019
> 年5月23日周四 下午5:29写道：
>
> I found another issue:
>
> 1. jackson is bundled twice in the uber jar.
> 2. javax annotations are included in the slim&uber jar
>
>
> As for 1), I messed up and modified the shading patterns only for
> hadoop-uber, resulting in 2 different shading patterns for jackson.
> (jackson is pulled into both jars separately; once explicitly in
> shaded-hadoop, and another time in shaded-hadoop-uber as a transitive
> dependency of avro)
>
> I've already fixed this on master.
>
> 2) happened because we didn't mark findbugs as provided like in the
> main
> project. I'm not quite sure why we aren't doing that, but I'm not too
> bothered by this being bundled. This kind of setups where we rely on
> Flink to provide certain dependencies are a bit brittle in general.
>
>
> On 23/05/2019 10:26, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
> >
> > Which maven version are you using?
> >
> > On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
> >> Thanks Jincheng,
> >> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
> >>
> >> -1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> # not working:
> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
> >>
> >> # ok:
> >> - checked release notes
> >> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
> >> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
> >>
> >> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
> >>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
> >>>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> - Release notes are correct.
> >>> - Built from source archive successfully.
> >>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
> >>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been
> >>> deployed to
> >>> the maven central repository.
> >>>
> >>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is
> not a
> >>> blocker.
> >>>
> >>> Best, Hequn
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun
> <sunjincheng121@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> >>>> 7.0, as
> >>>> follows:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> >>>>
> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>>> includes:
> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
> >>>> [2],
> >>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
> >>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority
> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Jincheng
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>
> >>>>
> >>>> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>> [4]
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
> >>>>
> >
> >
>
--
Nico Kruber | Solutions Architect
Follow us @VervericaData Ververica
--
Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
--
Data Artisans GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
--
Data Artisans GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Dr. Kostas Tzoumas, Dr. Stephan Ewen
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your quickly merged the PR! @Chesnay Schepler
<ch...@apache.org>!
I’m hereby canceling the VOTE for RC2 of flink-shaded 7.0 release, because
of the aforementioned issues.
I’ll create an RC3 for flink-shaded 7.0 release ASAP. due to all issues are
already resolved! :)
Thanks,
Jincheng
jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> 于2019年5月24日周五 下午12:03写道：
> I found we should also add the `slf4j-api` as a `provided` dependency for
> `flink-shaded-hadoop-2`.
>
> @Nico, Thanks for your check, and the
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598 is not the blocker.
>
> @Chesnay, I remember where we already discussed this issue, the problems
> caused by `provided` scope, and now, It seems nice to have added the
> changes for the RC3!
>
> What do you think? @Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
>
> The PR can be found here: https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/64
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org> 于2019年5月23日周四 下午5:29写道：
>
>> I found another issue:
>>
>> 1. jackson is bundled twice in the uber jar.
>> 2. javax annotations are included in the slim&uber jar
>>
>>
>> As for 1), I messed up and modified the shading patterns only for
>> hadoop-uber, resulting in 2 different shading patterns for jackson.
>> (jackson is pulled into both jars separately; once explicitly in
>> shaded-hadoop, and another time in shaded-hadoop-uber as a transitive
>> dependency of avro)
>>
>> I've already fixed this on master.
>>
>> 2) happened because we didn't mark findbugs as provided like in the main
>> project. I'm not quite sure why we aren't doing that, but I'm not too
>> bothered by this being bundled. This kind of setups where we rely on
>> Flink to provide certain dependencies are a bit brittle in general.
>>
>>
>> On 23/05/2019 10:26, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> > Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
>> >
>> > Which maven version are you using?
>> >
>> > On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
>> >> Thanks Jincheng,
>> >> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
>> >>
>> >> -1 (non-binding)
>> >>
>> >> # not working:
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>> >>
>> >> # ok:
>> >> - checked release notes
>> >> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
>> >> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
>> >>
>> >> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
>> >>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>>
>> >>> - Release notes are correct.
>> >>> - Built from source archive successfully.
>> >>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
>> >>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been
>> >>> deployed to
>> >>> the maven central repository.
>> >>>
>> >>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is not a
>> >>> blocker.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best, Hequn
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun <
>> sunjincheng121@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>> >>>> 7.0, as
>> >>>> follows:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> >>>> includes:
>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org
>> >>>> [2],
>> >>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>> >>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> >>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
>> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority
>> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Jincheng
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [2]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> >>>> [4]
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
>> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>> >>>>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
I found we should also add the `slf4j-api` as a `provided` dependency for
`flink-shaded-hadoop-2`.
@Nico, Thanks for your check, and the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
FLINK-12598 is not the blocker.
@Chesnay, I remember where we already discussed this issue, the problems
caused by `provided` scope, and now, It seems nice to have added the
changes for the RC3!
What do you think? @Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
The PR can be found here: https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/64
Best,
Jincheng
Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org> 于2019年5月23日周四 下午5:29写道：
> I found another issue:
>
> 1. jackson is bundled twice in the uber jar.
> 2. javax annotations are included in the slim&uber jar
>
>
> As for 1), I messed up and modified the shading patterns only for
> hadoop-uber, resulting in 2 different shading patterns for jackson.
> (jackson is pulled into both jars separately; once explicitly in
> shaded-hadoop, and another time in shaded-hadoop-uber as a transitive
> dependency of avro)
>
> I've already fixed this on master.
>
> 2) happened because we didn't mark findbugs as provided like in the main
> project. I'm not quite sure why we aren't doing that, but I'm not too
> bothered by this being bundled. This kind of setups where we rely on
> Flink to provide certain dependencies are a bit brittle in general.
>
>
> On 23/05/2019 10:26, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
> >
> > Which maven version are you using?
> >
> > On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
> >> Thanks Jincheng,
> >> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
> >>
> >> -1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> # not working:
> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
> >>
> >> # ok:
> >> - checked release notes
> >> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
> >> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
> >>
> >> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
> >>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
> >>>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> - Release notes are correct.
> >>> - Built from source archive successfully.
> >>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
> >>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been
> >>> deployed to
> >>> the maven central repository.
> >>>
> >>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is not a
> >>> blocker.
> >>>
> >>> Best, Hequn
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun <sunjincheng121@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> >>>> 7.0, as
> >>>> follows:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>
> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>>> includes:
> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org
> >>>> [2],
> >>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
> >>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Jincheng
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
> >>>>
> >>>> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>> [4]
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
> >>>>
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
I found another issue:
1. jackson is bundled twice in the uber jar.
2. javax annotations are included in the slim&uber jar
As for 1), I messed up and modified the shading patterns only for
hadoop-uber, resulting in 2 different shading patterns for jackson.
(jackson is pulled into both jars separately; once explicitly in
shaded-hadoop, and another time in shaded-hadoop-uber as a transitive
dependency of avro)
I've already fixed this on master.
2) happened because we didn't mark findbugs as provided like in the main
project. I'm not quite sure why we aren't doing that, but I'm not too
bothered by this being bundled. This kind of setups where we rely on
Flink to provide certain dependencies are a bit brittle in general.
On 23/05/2019 10:26, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
>
> Which maven version are you using?
>
> On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
>> Thanks Jincheng,
>> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
>>
>> -1 (non-binding)
>>
>> # not working:
>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>>
>> # ok:
>> - checked release notes
>> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
>> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
>>
>> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
>>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> - Release notes are correct.
>>> - Built from source archive successfully.
>>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
>>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been
>>> deployed to
>>> the maven central repository.
>>>
>>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is not a
>>> blocker.
>>>
>>> Best, Hequn
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>>> 7.0, as
>>>> follows:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> includes:
>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>>> [2],
>>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
>>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jincheng
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>>>>
>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>> [4]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
Worked for me; could you try again without parallel builds?
Which maven version are you using?
On 23/05/2019 09:24, Nico Kruber wrote:
> Thanks Jincheng,
> unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> # not working:
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
>
> # ok:
> - checked release notes
> - verified signatures (sha512, asc)
> - verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
>
> On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
>> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> - Release notes are correct.
>> - Built from source archive successfully.
>> - Signatures and hash are correct.
>> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been deployed to
>> the maven central repository.
>>
>> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is not a
>> blocker.
>>
>> Best, Hequn
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 7.0, as
>>> follows:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>> [2],
>>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jincheng
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Nico Kruber <ni...@ververica.com>.
Thanks Jincheng,
unfortunately, I think, I found a blocker:
-1 (non-binding)
# not working:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12598
# ok:
- checked release notes
- verified signatures (sha512, asc)
- verified "mvn clean package -Pinclude-netty-tcnative-static"
On 22/05/2019 07:32, Hequn Cheng wrote:
> Thank you Jincheng for the release!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Release notes are correct.
> - Built from source archive successfully.
> - Signatures and hash are correct.
> - All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been deployed to
> the maven central repository.
>
> One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is not a
> blocker.
>
> Best, Hequn
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 7.0, as
>> follows:
>>
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>> [2],
>> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
>> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jincheng
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>>
>
--
Nico Kruber | Solutions Architect
Follow us @VervericaData Ververica
--
Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
--
Data Artisans GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
--
Data Artisans GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Dr. Kostas Tzoumas, Dr. Stephan Ewen
Re: [VOTE] Release flink-shaded 7.0, release candidate 2
Posted by Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Jincheng for the release!
+1 (non-binding)
- Release notes are correct.
- Built from source archive successfully.
- Signatures and hash are correct.
- All artifacts(11 artifacts including flink-shaded) have been deployed to
the maven central repository.
One minor comment for the website pull request but I think it is not a
blocker.
Best, Hequn
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 7.0, as
> follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [2],
> which are signed with the key with fingerprint
> 8FEA1EE9D0048C0CCC70B7573211B0703B79EA0E [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "release-7.0-rc2" [5],
> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jincheng
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345226&styleName=Html&projectId=12315522&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8ba061049bec0c5a72dc0191c47bb53a73b82cb4%7Clin
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-shaded-7.0-rc2/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1218
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/tree/release-7.0-rc2
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/209
>