You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de> on 2020/01/24 16:57:32 UTC
Re: Polluting the vote thread, was: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and
directly publish R18 instead.
Could you please stop discussing inside the vote thread itself?
Firstly, we discussed beforehand and the vote should be held on base of
that discussion. If more infomation is added we might even have to
cancel the vote again because participants who already voted had another
base of information.
Secondly, it is rather difficult to follow to see the real vote results.
Thanks
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 24.01.20 um 17:42 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most
> of us are not backporting since we turned to Git.
>
> I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons?
>
> Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Hi Taher,
>>
>> Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none.
>> this may explain that ;)
>>
>> As I said to Nicolas:
>>
>> <<I must say I'm mostly against [releasing R17] because of the
>> surplus of effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18.
>> [...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where
>> we had scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297
>> would be
>> done... >>
>>
>> Let's see what the future will tell us...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>>> -1
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne
>>> <gi...@nereide.fr>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
>>>> support. We
>>>>> can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next
>>>>> to be
>>>>> released package
>>>>>
>>>>> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
>>>>> prefer
>>>> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>> Vote:
>>>>> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>>>>>
>>>>> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus,
>>>>> so this
>>>> vote will be only open for a week.
>>>>> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
>>>> another process documented at
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your attention
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
Re: Polluting the vote thread, was: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and
directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Sure, just that Taher started with "I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch." and I wanted to explain more my perspective.
OK the buck stop here :)
Jacques
Le 24/01/2020 à 17:57, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> Could you please stop discussing inside the vote thread itself?
>
> Firstly, we discussed beforehand and the vote should be held on base of that discussion. If more infomation is added we might even have to cancel
> the vote again because participants who already voted had another base of information.
>
> Secondly, it is rather difficult to follow to see the real vote results.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 24.01.20 um 17:42 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>> Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most of us are not backporting since we turned to Git.
>>
>> I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons?
>>
>> Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>> Hi Taher,
>>>
>>> Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;)
>>>
>>> As I said to Nicolas:
>>>
>>> <<I must say I'm mostly against [releasing R17] because of the surplus of effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18.
>>> [...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where we had scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297 would be
>>> done... >>
>>>
>>> Let's see what the future will tell us...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne <gi...@nereide.fr>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
>>>>> support. We
>>>>>> can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
>>>>>> released package
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
>>>>> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>>> Vote:
>>>>>> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>>> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
>>>>> vote will be only open for a week.
>>>>>> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
>>>>> another process documented at
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>>>>>> Thank you for your attention
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>