Re: Preliminary design proposal for charset normalization support in SpamAssassin

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Faisal N Jawdat <fa...@faisal.com> writes:
> 
> >> We can probably safely up the requirement for HTML::Parser in our next
> >> major revision.  Conditioning is also okay.
> 
> > What are reasons against doing this?  I've sat through the "What is  
> > the regexp for matching this HTML pattern", "Don't use a regexp to  
> > parse HTML, use a real parser", "Here, HTML::Parser", "Wait, that's  
> > an optional install -- we can't rely on that" conversation at least 4  
> > times *in the last 10 days*.
> 
> I have no idea what your point is.
> 
> We already require HTML::Parser.  The only question is whether or not we
> should raise the minimum required version.  I suggested that we raise it
> and I doubt anyone will have major objections since we haven't raised
> the minimum version for a while.

yep, Faisal -- you're *waaay* off here....

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFDB3LEMJF5cimLx9ARAhWlAJwNDOTrL+4uMqF89wr2kayyxyFPPQCgu3Mr
ohEfEocqxZYnQseDo7zxBww=
=ac5Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----