You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com> on 2019/06/02 10:47:01 UTC
Alternate Fields for Unified Highlighter
Hi All,
I want to switch to Unified Highlighter due to performance reasons for my
Solr 7.6 I was using these fields
solrQuery.addHighlightField("content_*")
.set("f.content_en.hl.alternateField", "content")
.set("f.content_es.hl.alternateField", "content")
.set("hl.useFastVectorHighlighter", "true");
.set("hl.maxAlternateFieldLength", 300);
As far as I see, there is no definitions for alternate fields for unified
highlighter. How can I configure such a configuration?
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
Re: Alternate Fields for Unified Highlighter
Posted by Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>.
Hi David,
Thanks for the response! I use Unified Highlighter combined with
maxAnalyzedChars to accomplish my needs.
I'll file an issue and PR for it!
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:25 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> Feel free to file an issue; I know it's not supported. I also don't think
> it's a big deal because you can just ask Solr to return the
> "alternateField", thus letting the client side choose when to use that. I
> suppose it might be large, so I can imagine a concern there. It'd be nice
> if Solr had a DocTransformer to accomplish that.
>
> I know it's been awhile; I'm curious how the UH has been working for you,
> assuming you are using it.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 6:47 AM Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I want to switch to Unified Highlighter due to performance reasons for my
> > Solr 7.6 I was using these fields
> >
> > solrQuery.addHighlightField("content_*")
> > .set("f.content_en.hl.alternateField", "content")
> > .set("f.content_es.hl.alternateField", "content")
> > .set("hl.useFastVectorHighlighter", "true");
> > .set("hl.maxAlternateFieldLength", 300);
> >
> > As far as I see, there is no definitions for alternate fields for unified
> > highlighter. How can I configure such a configuration?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Furkan KAMACI
> >
>
Re: Alternate Fields for Unified Highlighter
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
Feel free to file an issue; I know it's not supported. I also don't think
it's a big deal because you can just ask Solr to return the
"alternateField", thus letting the client side choose when to use that. I
suppose it might be large, so I can imagine a concern there. It'd be nice
if Solr had a DocTransformer to accomplish that.
I know it's been awhile; I'm curious how the UH has been working for you,
assuming you are using it.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 6:47 AM Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to switch to Unified Highlighter due to performance reasons for my
> Solr 7.6 I was using these fields
>
> solrQuery.addHighlightField("content_*")
> .set("f.content_en.hl.alternateField", "content")
> .set("f.content_es.hl.alternateField", "content")
> .set("hl.useFastVectorHighlighter", "true");
> .set("hl.maxAlternateFieldLength", 300);
>
> As far as I see, there is no definitions for alternate fields for unified
> highlighter. How can I configure such a configuration?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>