Tiles 2.0.3 release doubts.

[Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>]

Hi all!
I think that I finished making the 2.0.3 release, but before sending
the first announcement, I have two doubts that I need to clear.

1. I uploaded the distribution files (source and binary) and their
".asc" files, but I noticed that Struts 2 folks uploaded ".md5" too
(in 2.0.7). Should I upload them too?

2. I released the 2.0.2 JIRA version, probably by mistake. Should I
"unrelease" it? Or archive?

After clearing these doubts I will proceed to the announcement.

Thanks in advance
Antonio

Re: Tiles 2.0.3 release doubts.

["David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>]

Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Hi all!
> I think that I finished making the 2.0.3 release, but before sending
> the first announcement, I have two doubts that I need to clear.
> 
> 1. I uploaded the distribution files (source and binary) and their
> ".asc" files, but I noticed that Struts 2 folks uploaded ".md5" too
> (in 2.0.7). Should I upload them too?
> 
> 2. I released the 2.0.2 JIRA version, probably by mistake. Should I
> "unrelease" it? Or archive?

I think releasing it is appropriate.  Releasing in JIRA basically closes 
it out which is what we want to do.  The naming is bad since 2.0.2 was 
never a release, but a failed test build.  I think it's just a matter of 
the tool no matching our process 100% and think we should leave it closed.

> 
> After clearing these doubts I will proceed to the announcement.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Antonio
> 

Re: Tiles 2.0.3 release doubts.

[Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>]

On 4/2/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all!
> I think that I finished making the 2.0.3 release, but before sending
> the first announcement, I have two doubts that I need to clear.
>
> 1. I uploaded the distribution files (source and binary) and their
> ".asc" files, but I noticed that Struts 2 folks uploaded ".md5" too
> (in 2.0.7). Should I upload them too?


Yes please. AFAIK, both are required.

--
Martin Cooper


2. I released the 2.0.2 JIRA version, probably by mistake. Should I
> "unrelease" it? Or archive?
>
> After clearing these doubts I will proceed to the announcement.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Antonio
>

Re: Tiles 2.0.3 release doubts.

[Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>]

2007/4/2, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> On 4/2/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Maven artifacts are missing .asc signatures:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.3/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/tiles/tiles-core/2.0.3/

Mmm I suppose that I need to redeploy them.

>
> Do we have the gpg plugin configured for Tiles?

Yes, it is in the "tiles-parent" pom. The problem is that the
"release" profile was not activated. The tiles-assembly module has
signature since I needed to deploy it after the execution of the
release phase, and I forced the "release" profile:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-148

In Maven's pom they use an additional argument to force the release profile:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html

I'll upload all the stuff ASAP.

Thanks
Antonio

Re: Tiles 2.0.3 release doubts.

[Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>]

On 4/2/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
> I think that I finished making the 2.0.3 release, but before sending
> the first announcement, I have two doubts that I need to clear.
>
> 1. I uploaded the distribution files (source and binary) and their
> ".asc" files, but I noticed that Struts 2 folks uploaded ".md5" too
> (in 2.0.7). Should I upload them too?

Yes, both a checksum and a signature are required.

The Maven artifacts are missing .asc signatures:
http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.3/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/tiles/tiles-core/2.0.3/

Do we have the gpg plugin configured for Tiles?

-- 
Wendy