RE: BasicAuth realm String

[Andrei Shakirin <as...@talend.com>]

+1 for "Apache Syncope authentication" for now.
Potentially can be customized as well.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin@gmail.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013 17:40
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BasicAuth realm String
> 
> On 27/02/13 14:27, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > Hi Sergey,
> >
> > I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when
> > using
> >> Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the
> >> realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral
> >> name  as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may
> >> be just omitted during the challenge by default,
> >
> >
> > I will just change it to "Apache Syncope authentication" for now.
> 
> Thinking more about it, this is probably the best default option indeed, you
> are all right :-)
> 
> Cheers, Sergey
> 
> >The
> > ability to make it customisable via a property seems reasonable, could
> >log  a JIRA for it?
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Sergey
> Beryozkin<sb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On 27/02/13 07:49, Francesco Chicchiriccň wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following:
> >>>>
> >>>> private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = "Basic
> >>>> realm=\"Spring Security Application\"";
> >>>>
> >>>> I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears
> >>>> when authenticating to access the new CXF-based REST API as well.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>>   Any objections or suggestions?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> What about "Apache Syncope authentication"?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when
> >> using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting
> >> the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more
> >> neutral name  as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management,
> >> etc) or may be just omitted during the challenge by default,
> >>
> >> Thanks, Sergey
> >>
> >>   Regards.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >