You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/07/12 22:13:14 UTC

[jira] Updated: (COLLECTIONS-328) ListUtils.intersect is slow

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Henri Yandell updated COLLECTIONS-328:
--------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 3.3

> ListUtils.intersect is slow
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: COLLECTIONS-328
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-328
>             Project: Commons Collections
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jilles van Gurp
>             Fix For: 3.3
>
>
> ListUtils.intersect is quite slow and can be improved by using a HashSet for the contains operation which cuts the complexity from n^2 to n. I ran into this by intersecting two lists with a few hundred thousand elements.
> current:
> public static List intersection(final List list1, final List list2) {
>         final ArrayList result = new ArrayList();
>         final Iterator iterator = list2.iterator();
>         while (iterator.hasNext()) {
>             final Object o = iterator.next();
>             if (list1.contains(o)) {
>                 result.add(o);
>             }
>         }
>         return result;
> Basically would work by inserting list1 into a HashSet like this:
> Set objs = new HashSet();
> objs.addAll(list1);
> and then instead of list1.contains do a objs.contains
> Further performance can be gained by picking the smallest list for this with a simple size comparison.
> BTW what is this method supposed to do with duplicate entries in lists? Semantics are not really clear here as opposed to set intersection.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.