You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2016/11/04 14:40:30 UTC

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
SystemML version 0.11.0!

The PPMC vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01097.html

And the result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01118.html

The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc5
(c2e1670c2745863195d4789f1f77ed01ec11af5e)

https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/c2e1670c27
45863195d4789f1f77ed01ec11af5e

The release artifacts can be found at :

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
11.0-incubating-rc5/

The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1011/


The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
3 +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
And we received another IPMC binding +1 from our mentor Reynold at the
SystemML dev list

https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01126.html

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:36 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> So I'm comfortable giving a +1 on the release source tarball.  It looks
> complete enough to pass.
>
> I am generally concerned about the release management on the podling.  We
> can follow up.
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:51 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would
> really
> > like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data
> early
> > next week.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> > >
> > > It only contains the following now :
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha
> > >
> > >
> > > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926
> > >
> > > Based on this, here is my +1.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndament@apache.org');>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Deron,
> > >>
> > >> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you
> > some
> > >> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
> > >> (and
> > >> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
> > >>
> > >> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the
> > .asc,
> > >> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
> > >> that's too important.
> > >>
> > >> The overall release contents are made up of:
> > >>
> > >> - Source ZIP file
> > >> - POM file for the root of the project
> > >> - The convenience binary zip
> > >> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
> > >>
> > >> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I
> think
> > >> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what
> is
> > >> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source
> > zip,
> > >> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc
> > and
> > >> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <
> deroneriksson@gmail.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would
> > it
> > >> be
> > >> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following
> > >> with
> > >> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could
> > include
> > >> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the
> dist
> > >> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
> > >> >
> > >> > Source distribution:
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> > >> >
> > >> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > >> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Deron
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
> > >> justin@classsoftware.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','justin@classsoftware.com');>>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the
> > >> source
> > >> > > > release
> > >> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from
> distributing
> > >> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
> > >> requirements
> > >> > > > > mandated by Apache.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external
> > person)
> > >> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email
> doesn’t
> > >> > clarify
> > >> > > > it.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a
> README
> > >> to
> > >> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> > >> > > > > our previous release
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess
> > but
> > >> > > still
> > >> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
> > >> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing
> > list:
> > >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> > >> > > org/msg01121.html
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the
> > release
> > >> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
> > >> SystemML
> > >> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
> > >> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid
> > further
> > >> > > confusion on the matter.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Justin
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Luciano Resende
> > >> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > >> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Mobile device
> >
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi,

So I'm comfortable giving a +1 on the release source tarball.  It looks
complete enough to pass.

I am generally concerned about the release management on the podling.  We
can follow up.

John

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:51 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would really
> like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data early
> next week.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> >
> > It only contains the following now :
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha
> >
> >
> > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926
> >
> > Based on this, here is my +1.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndament@apache.org');>> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Deron,
> >>
> >> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you
> some
> >> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
> >> (and
> >> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
> >>
> >> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the
> .asc,
> >> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
> >> that's too important.
> >>
> >> The overall release contents are made up of:
> >>
> >> - Source ZIP file
> >> - POM file for the root of the project
> >> - The convenience binary zip
> >> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
> >>
> >> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I think
> >> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is
> >> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source
> zip,
> >> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc
> and
> >> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would
> it
> >> be
> >> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following
> >> with
> >> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could
> include
> >> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
> >> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
> >> >
> >> > Source distribution:
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> >> >
> >> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> >> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> >> >
> >> > Thank you,
> >> > Deron
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
> >> justin@classsoftware.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','justin@classsoftware.com');>>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the
> >> source
> >> > > > release
> >> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> >> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
> >> requirements
> >> > > > > mandated by Apache.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external
> person)
> >> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t
> >> > clarify
> >> > > > it.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README
> >> to
> >> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> >> > > > > our previous release
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess
> but
> >> > > still
> >> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
> >> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing
> list:
> >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> >> > > org/msg01121.html
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the
> release
> >> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
> >> SystemML
> >> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
> >> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid
> further
> >> > > confusion on the matter.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Justin
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Luciano Resende
> >> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Mobile device
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would really
like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data early
next week.

Thanks

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> It only contains the following now :
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha
>
>
> There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926
>
> Based on this, here is my +1.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndament@apache.org');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Deron,
>>
>> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some
>> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
>> (and
>> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
>>
>> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the .asc,
>> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
>> that's too important.
>>
>> The overall release contents are made up of:
>>
>> - Source ZIP file
>> - POM file for the root of the project
>> - The convenience binary zip
>> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
>>
>> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I think
>> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is
>> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source zip,
>> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc and
>> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it
>> be
>> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following
>> with
>> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include
>> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
>> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
>> >
>> > Source distribution:
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
>> >
>> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
>> >
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
>> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Deron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
>> justin@classsoftware.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','justin@classsoftware.com');>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the
>> source
>> > > > release
>> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
>> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
>> requirements
>> > > > > mandated by Apache.
>> > > >
>> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person)
>> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t
>> > clarify
>> > > > it.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README
>> to
>> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
>> > > > > our previous release
>> > > >
>> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but
>> > > still
>> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
>> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list:
>> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
>> > > org/msg01121.html
>> > >
>> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release
>> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
>> SystemML
>> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
>> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further
>> > > confusion on the matter.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Justin
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Luciano Resende
>> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Sent from my Mobile device

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc5/

It only contains the following now :
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha


There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926

Based on this, here is my +1.


On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Deron,
>
> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some
> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
> (and
> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
>
> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the .asc,
> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
> that's too important.
>
> The overall release contents are made up of:
>
> - Source ZIP file
> - POM file for the root of the project
> - The convenience binary zip
> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
>
> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I think
> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is
> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source zip,
> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc and
> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it
> be
> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following with
> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include
> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
> >
> > Source distribution:
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> >
> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
> >
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
> justin@classsoftware.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source
> > > > release
> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
> requirements
> > > > > mandated by Apache.
> > > >
> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person)
> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t
> > clarify
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README to
> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> > > > > our previous release
> > > >
> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but
> > > still
> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list:
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> > > org/msg01121.html
> > >
> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release
> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
> SystemML
> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further
> > > confusion on the matter.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Justin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi Deron,

Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some
guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/ (and
i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)

In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the .asc,
.sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
that's too important.

The overall release contents are made up of:

- Source ZIP file
- POM file for the root of the project
- The convenience binary zip
- The convenience binary .tar.gz

I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I think
the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is
what in your release.  If your release only included a single source zip,
two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc and
md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.

John

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it be
> acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following with
> their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include
> the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
> artifacts from 9 to 4.
>
> Source distribution:
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
>
> Binary distribution with dependencies:
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> Thank you,
> Deron
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source
> > > release
> > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal requirements
> > > > mandated by Apache.
> > >
> > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person)
> > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t
> clarify
> > > it.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README to
> > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> > > > our previous release
> > >
> > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but
> > still
> > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> > >
> > >
> > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
> > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> > org/msg01121.html
> >
> > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release
> > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the SystemML
> > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
> > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further
> > confusion on the matter.
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Hello,

Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it be
acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following with
their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include
the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
artifacts from 9 to 4.

Source distribution:
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip

Binary distribution with dependencies:
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc5/

Thank you,
Deron


On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source
> > release
> > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal requirements
> > > mandated by Apache.
> >
> > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person)
> > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t clarify
> > it.
> >
>
> Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README to
> clarify what are the artifacts being released.
>
>
> >
> > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> > > our previous release
> >
> > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but
> still
> > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> >
> >
> Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
> documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> org/msg01121.html
>
> Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release
> (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the SystemML
> podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
> distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further
> confusion on the matter.
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source
> release
> > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal requirements
> > mandated by Apache.
>
> Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person)
> exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t clarify
> it.
>

Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README to
clarify what are the artifacts being released.


>
> > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> > our previous release
>
> Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but still
> not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
>
>
Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01121.html

Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release
(*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the SystemML
podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further
confusion on the matter.


> Thanks,
> Justin




-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,

> I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source release
> artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal requirements
> mandated by Apache.

Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person) exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t clarify it.

> Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> our previous release

Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but still not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 6:24 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > The release artifacts can be found at :
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > > > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> > >
> > > Again it a little confusing what is actually being released here, why
> are
> > > jars included here? [1] Remember maven is not the primary release area
> > [2]
> > >
> > > What exactly were the artefacts that were voted on the dev list?
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> > > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#where-do-releases-go
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > Thanks for taking the time to review SystemML RC Justin.
> > Please see this thread:
> >
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> org/msg01121.html
> >
> > But in summary, the release folder you linked above contains the
> following
> > artifacts
> >
> > - Source Release
> >
>
> This is the only artifact that should be in the dist area, along with the
> appropriate signature files.  Can you remove the others?
>
>
>
I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source release
artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal requirements
mandated by Apache. Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
our previous releases, and by looking into recently approved podling
releases, they seem to have binary releases as well, maybe except the jar
related artifacts, that I believe would be ok to remove if that is causing
confusion.


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > The release artifacts can be found at :
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> >
> > Again it a little confusing what is actually being released here, why are
> > jars included here? [1] Remember maven is not the primary release area
> [2]
> >
> > What exactly were the artefacts that were voted on the dev list?
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#where-do-releases-go
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> Thanks for taking the time to review SystemML RC Justin.
> Please see this thread:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01121.html
>
> But in summary, the release folder you linked above contains the following
> artifacts
>
> - Source Release
>

This is the only artifact that should be in the dist area, along with the
appropriate signature files.  Can you remove the others?


> - Binary Release
> - Standalone Release (to run in local mode, without dependency on a runtime
> such as Apache Spark)
> - And the convenience binary jar.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > The release artifacts can be found at :
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> Again it a little confusing what is actually being released here, why are
> jars included here? [1] Remember maven is not the primary release area [2]
>
> What exactly were the artefacts that were voted on the dev list?
>
> Justin
>
> 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#where-do-releases-go
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Thanks for taking the time to review SystemML RC Justin.
Please see this thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01121.html

But in summary, the release folder you linked above contains the following
artifacts

- Source Release
- Binary Release
- Standalone Release (to run in local mode, without dependency on a runtime
such as Apache Spark)
- And the convenience binary jar.

Thanks

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,

> The release artifacts can be found at :
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc5/

Again it a little confusing what is actually being released here, why are jars included here? [1] Remember maven is not the primary release area [2]

What exactly were the artefacts that were voted on the dev list?

Justin

1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc5/
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#where-do-releases-go
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Posted by Fred Reiss <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1

Fred

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> SystemML version 0.11.0!
>
> The PPMC vote thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> org/msg01097.html
>
> And the result:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> org/msg01118.html
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc5
> (c2e1670c2745863195d4789f1f77ed01ec11af5e)
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/c2e1670c27
> 45863195d4789f1f77ed01ec11af5e
>
> The release artifacts can be found at :
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1011/
>
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>