Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7910] New: - WSADuplicateSocket on starting the server

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Dunno the right forum, so we can start here.  But a bugzilla@ list might be
worthwhile, so we don't task those watching infrastructure@ and get some
cross-project discussion going.

Can we change the Subject to quit wrapping the description of the bug,
and move most of the "DON'T REPLY" fooness to the end of the message?
These 'features' make browsing emails of bug reports very tedious.

A better solution might be to munge the Reply-To to something like
DO-NOT-REPLY@nowhere.apache.org ... so it's evident.  Even two
liner at the top (with a link to the bug) would be better than 10 lines
today that include the subject duplicated right off the bat within the
mail body, once as "Subject:" (cool) and duplicated two lines above
that reference (redundant).

FINALLY, THE ALL CAPS THING IS REALLY, REALLY ANNOYING.

:-)

Bill

>Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" <bu...@httpd.apache.org>
>Date: 10 Apr 2002 08:01:05 -0000
>From: bugzilla@apache.org
>Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7910] New:  -
>     WSADuplicateSocket on starting the server
>
>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7910>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7910
>
>WSADuplicateSocket on starting the server
>
>            Summary: WSADuplicateSocket on starting the server
>            Product: Apache httpd-2.0
>            Version: 2.0.35
>           Platform: PC
>         OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: Normal
>           Priority: Other
>          Component: All
>         AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
>         ReportedBy: rbund@electronicpartner.de
>
>
>I receive the error "WSADuplicateSocket failed for socket 3117432" on 
>starting Apache httpd-
>2.0. Starting the version 1.3 on the same machine with corresponding .conf 
>file does work without
>any problem.
>
>There is neither a firewall not a vpn or any other software blocking the port
>installed.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7910] New: - WSADuplicateSocket on starting the server

[Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>]

"William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:

> Dunno the right forum, so we can start here.  But a bugzilla@ list might be
> worthwhile, so we don't task those watching infrastructure@ and get some
> cross-project discussion going.
> 
> Can we change the Subject to quit wrapping the description of the bug,
> and move most of the "DON'T REPLY" fooness to the end of the message?
> These 'features' make browsing emails of bug reports very tedious.
> 
> A better solution might be to munge the Reply-To to something like
> DO-NOT-REPLY@nowhere.apache.org ... so it's evident.

Can't do that in BugZilla...

> Even two
> liner at the top (with a link to the bug) would be better than 10 lines
> today that include the subject duplicated right off the bat within the
> mail body, once as "Subject:" (cool) and duplicated two lines above
> that reference (redundant).

There's no way to change the "format" of the BugZilla emails... Only some
rough controls, but not much...

> FINALLY, THE ALL CAPS THING IS REALLY, REALLY ANNOYING.

Bill, I understand your grief, but you understand mine...
With all those warnings, it's already a PITA because I usually end up with
10/15 idiots a day replying to those messages...

When I just had one line, the idiots were 10/15 a DAY!...

I'm going to accept the change only if someone volunteers to respond to the
idiots, and take over for the bugzilla@apache.org alias...

    Pier