You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2016/01/07 21:52:39 UTC

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Hi,

> As I mentioned in the VOTE thread, the build is successful.
> But when I ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0.  Reports 'build
> successful,  C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
> Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' and
> AIR version 16.0 was downloaded.
> 
> Am I doing something wrong here?

I assume you first compiled the src package before running ant -f installer.xml?

I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I think the issue was that the using an OS X made SDK on Windows. The scripts only downloads the version of AIR for a single platform. Perhaps the installer is grabbing the OS X version of AIR??

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 1/7/16, 12:56 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I
> >> think the issue was that the using an OS X made SDK on Windows. The
> >>scripts
> >> only downloads the version of AIR for a single platform. Perhaps the
> >> installer is grabbing the OS X version of AIR??
> >>
> >
> >How would I check and confirm if this is indeed the casel?
> >
>
> Post the Ant output somewhere.
>
> I just tried it on Mac and it worked fine.  Don't forget to follow the
> README instructions and run "ant frameworks-rsls" otherwise FB won't
> recognize the folder as a Flex SDK.
>

You are right, it was user error.  I did not run ant frameworks-rsls.
That's why FB did not like this SDK.

I retried everything from scratch, the correct AIR SDK (19.0) is being
downloaded as well.

Changing my vote to +1.

Thanks,
Om


>
> -Alex
>
>

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.

On 1/7/16, 12:56 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
<omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I
>> think the issue was that the using an OS X made SDK on Windows. The
>>scripts
>> only downloads the version of AIR for a single platform. Perhaps the
>> installer is grabbing the OS X version of AIR??
>>
>
>How would I check and confirm if this is indeed the casel?
>

Post the Ant output somewhere.

I just tried it on Mac and it worked fine.  Don't forget to follow the
README instructions and run "ant frameworks-rsls" otherwise FB won't
recognize the folder as a Flex SDK.

-Alex


Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,

> How would I check and confirm if this is indeed the casel?

You’ll have bin/adl.exe and bin/adt.exe rather than bin/adl and bin/adt.

At a guess try:
ant thirdparty-clean
ant -f installer.xml air-download

And see which of the air download targets it runs. (air-setup-win or air-setup-mac)

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [Non-DoD Source] [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex SDK 4.15 release candidate 1

Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > As I mentioned in the VOTE thread, the build is successful.
> > But when I ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0.  Reports
> 'build
> > successful,  C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
> > Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK'
> and
> > AIR version 16.0 was downloaded.
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong here?
>
> I assume you first compiled the src package before running ant -f
> installer.xml?
>

Yes, build on src package was successful.


>
> I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I
> think the issue was that the using an OS X made SDK on Windows. The scripts
> only downloads the version of AIR for a single platform. Perhaps the
> installer is grabbing the OS X version of AIR??
>

How would I check and confirm if this is indeed the casel?


>
> Thanks,
> Justin