You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> on 2017/02/22 15:22:33 UTC
SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Hi all BookKeepers,
At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
OpenSSL + netty 4.
How the work is going ?
Open questions are:
1) status of my current patch on SSL
should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
2) switch to Netty 4:
Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
What are your current thoughts ?
-- Enrico
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
I was thinking about Friday too....
Enrico
2017-02-23 17:00 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or on
> Friday?
>
> Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> > >
> > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> It depends on the "host".
> > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the
> > >> room
> > >> linked at
> > >>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> Community+Meetings
> > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> > >>
> > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> > >>
> > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
> > meeting
> > >> ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> > >>
> > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
> > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join
> the
> > >> right
> > >> > one this time.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > - Bobby
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> > >> >
> > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Enrico
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> jujjuri@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's
> patch.
> > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore
> has
> > >> takes
> > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> > >> different
> > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I
> want
> > to
> > >> > make
> > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give
> it a
> > >> try.
> > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways.
> > >> Our
> > >> > > code
> > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and
> > see
> > >> > what
> > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
> Olivelli <
> > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my
> > >> > projects
> > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > >> > > > to Netty 4
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can
> take
> > >> care
> > >> > of
> > >> > > > the first port ?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Enrico
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> >:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.
> > >> > Simply
> > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
> > >> production
> > >> > so
> > >> > > > we
> > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of
> > >> other
> > >> > > > patches
> > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of
> patches
> > >> to
> > >> > > push
> > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult
> if
> > >> not
> > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until
> 4.6.x
> > >> for
> > >> > > > netty4
> > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so
> we
> > >> can
> > >> > > start
> > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a
> change
> > >> this
> > >> > > big
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
> > >> opinions.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
> > Olivelli <
> > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce
> > there
> > >> is
> > >> > > some
> > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances
> using
> > >> > native
> > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work
> > >> from
> > >> > it
> > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and
> now
> > >> from
> > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Jvrao
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> you,
> > >> then
> > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jvrao
> > > ---
> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then
> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jvrao
> > ---
> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Kkasiud1 <kk...@gmail.com>.
I am preparing Netty4 changes as a new PR.
Kishore
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sijie,
>>> Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
>>> Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeting
>>> was to get Netty 4.1 in in 4.5
>>> I think that most of the problem is that you local fork actually is based
>>> on Netty 3, as we recently discussed about the inclusion of the reference
>>> to Netty 3 HashedWheelTimer in one "public" API.
>>>
>>> How can we go on ? Merge Twitter/DistributedLog first and than upgrade to
>>> Netty and merge Yahoo work or interleave the changes ?
>>>
>>
>> My take here is that we should go ahead with merging netty4 first. We are
>> okay to rebase the change and merge it later.
>>
>>
> I agree. Let's not delay netty4 changes.
>
> JV
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> From my point of view I cannot give any good suggestion because I don't
>>> know the amount of work to be merged from all the three major forks.
>>>
>>> My two cents
>>>
>>> - Enrico
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-03-07 3:23 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> I need to catch up a bit about this thread.
>>>>
>>>> for my understanding, the question is shall we include netty 4.x
>> upgrade
>>> in
>>>> BK 4.5 release or shall we push to 4.6?
>>>>
>>>> - Sijie
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have just sent an email to JV
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and
>>>> just
>>>>>> waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Bobby
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>>>>>> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the
>> initial
>>>> SSL
>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to
>> current
>>>>>> master.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See you at the meeting
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Enrico
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok see you tomorrow
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>>>> jujjuri@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ha
>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to
>> Friday.
>>>>>> tomorrow
>>>>>>>> 8 AM PST.
>>>>>>>> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans
>>>>>> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Bobby
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico
>> Olivelli
>>> <
>>>>>>>>> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today,
>>>> Thursday
>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> Friday?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>>>>> jujjuri@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ha
>>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's
>>>>>> meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>>>>>>>>>> jujjuri@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you
>>> respond?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://hangouts.google.com/call/
>>> delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
>>>>>>>> eolivelli@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It depends on the "host".
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting.
>> Usually
>>>> we
>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> room
>>>>>>>>>>>> linked at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>>>>>>>>> Community+Meetings
>>>>>>>>>>>> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to
>>> drive/host
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> meeting
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
>>>>>> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time
>>>> there
>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be
>>> sure
>>>> I
>>>>>> join
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bobby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico
>>>>>> Olivelli <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
>> confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>>>>>>>>> jujjuri@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing
>>>>> Enrico's
>>>>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The
>> patch
>>>>>> kishore
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Netty 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
>>>>>>>>>>>> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If
>>> others
>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the
>>>> JIRA.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure we have the backing of the community on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bobby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST,
>>> Bobby
>>>>>> Evans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be
>> happy
>>>> to
>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>> it a
>>>>>>>>>>>> try.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it
>>> back
>>>>>>>> anyways.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look
>>> at
>>>>>> 4.1.x
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> differences there are with the API.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bobby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST,
>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>> Olivelli <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x
>> for
>>>> all
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I am very +1 on the switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Netty 4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Sijie what do you think ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x)
>>>> who
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>> care
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first port ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
>>>>>>>>>> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I really would like to get netty4 in sooner
>> rather
>>>> then
>>>>>>>> later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because we have been running with it for quite a
>>>> while
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> production
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis
>>> of
>>>> a
>>>>>> lot
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to push back. Meaning we only have a
>>> handful
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> patches
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back before netty4 starts to make things much
>> more
>>>>>>>> difficult
>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impossible for other patches. If we do want to
>>> wait
>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>> 4.6.x
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netty4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x
>> branch
>>>>> simply
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize
>>>> that
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to add more work to others too so I am open
>>> to
>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bobby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST,
>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>>> Olivelli <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the last community meeting JV reported that a
>>>>>> Salesforce
>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better
>>>>> performances
>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenSSL + netty 4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How the work is going ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Open questions are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I rebase, than get it merged and then
>>> continue
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely
>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) switch to Netty 4:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4
>> (from
>>>>> Yahoo
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for
>>>> 4.6.x.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are your current thoughts ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jvrao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then
>>> they
>>>>>> fight
>>>>>>>>> you,
>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Jvrao
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
>>> fight
>>>>>> you,
>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jvrao
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
>> fight
>>>>> you,
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jvrao
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
>>> you,
>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sijie,
> > Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
> > Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeting
> > was to get Netty 4.1 in in 4.5
> > I think that most of the problem is that you local fork actually is based
> > on Netty 3, as we recently discussed about the inclusion of the reference
> > to Netty 3 HashedWheelTimer in one "public" API.
> >
> > How can we go on ? Merge Twitter/DistributedLog first and than upgrade to
> > Netty and merge Yahoo work or interleave the changes ?
> >
>
> My take here is that we should go ahead with merging netty4 first. We are
> okay to rebase the change and merge it later.
>
>
I agree. Let's not delay netty4 changes.
JV
>
> >
> > From my point of view I cannot give any good suggestion because I don't
> > know the amount of work to be merged from all the three major forks.
> >
> > My two cents
> >
> > - Enrico
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-03-07 3:23 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > I need to catch up a bit about this thread.
> > >
> > > for my understanding, the question is shall we include netty 4.x
> upgrade
> > in
> > > BK 4.5 release or shall we push to 4.6?
> > >
> > > - Sijie
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have just sent an email to JV
> > > >
> > > > 2017-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >:
> > > >
> > > > > Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and
> > > just
> > > > > waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Bobby
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the
> initial
> > > SSL
> > > > > patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to
> current
> > > > > master.
> > > > >
> > > > > See you at the meeting
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Enrico
> > > > >
> > > > > 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ok see you tomorrow
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > jujjuri@gmail.com>
> > > > > ha
> > > > > > scritto:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to
> Friday.
> > > > > tomorrow
> > > > > >> 8 AM PST.
> > > > > >> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > - Bobby
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico
> Olivelli
> > <
> > > > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today,
> > > Thursday
> > > > or
> > > > > >> on
> > > > > >> > Friday?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> ha
> > > > > >> > scritto:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's
> > > > > meeting.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > > > >> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you
> > respond?
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/
> > delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > > >> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> It depends on the "host".
> > > > > >> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting.
> Usually
> > > we
> > > > > use
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > >> room
> > > > > >> > > >> linked at
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > > > > >> > Community+Meetings
> > > > > >> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to
> > drive/host
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > meeting
> > > > > >> > > >> ?
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > > > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > > >> >:
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time
> > > there
> > > > > was
> > > > > >> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be
> > sure
> > > I
> > > > > join
> > > > > >> > the
> > > > > >> > > >> right
> > > > > >> > > >> > one this time.
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> > - Bobby
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico
> > > > > Olivelli <
> > > > > >> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > > > > >> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> > Enrico
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > > > >> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > > >:
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing
> > > > Enrico's
> > > > > >> > patch.
> > > > > >> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The
> patch
> > > > > kishore
> > > > > >> > has
> > > > > >> > > >> takes
> > > > > >> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > > > >> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If
> > others
> > > > > have a
> > > > > >> > > >> different
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the
> > > JIRA.
> > > > > I
> > > > > >> > want
> > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > >> > > >> > make
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST,
> > Bobby
> > > > > Evans
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be
> happy
> > > to
> > > > > give
> > > > > >> > it a
> > > > > >> > > >> try.
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it
> > back
> > > > > >> anyways.
> > > > > >> > > >> Our
> > > > > >> > > >> > > code
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look
> > at
> > > > > 4.1.x
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > > see
> > > > > >> > > >> > what
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST,
> > Enrico
> > > > > >> > Olivelli <
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x
> for
> > > all
> > > > > of
> > > > > >> my
> > > > > >> > > >> > projects
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x)
> > > who
> > > > > can
> > > > > >> > take
> > > > > >> > > >> care
> > > > > >> > > >> > of
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > the first port ?
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Enrico
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > > > > >> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > > >> > > >> >:
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner
> rather
> > > then
> > > > > >> later.
> > > > > >> > > >> > Simply
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a
> > > while
> > > > in
> > > > > >> > > >> production
> > > > > >> > > >> > so
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > we
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis
> > of
> > > a
> > > > > lot
> > > > > >> of
> > > > > >> > > >> other
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > patches
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a
> > handful
> > > > of
> > > > > >> > patches
> > > > > >> > > >> to
> > > > > >> > > >> > > push
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much
> more
> > > > > >> difficult
> > > > > >> > if
> > > > > >> > > >> not
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to
> > wait
> > > > > until
> > > > > >> > 4.6.x
> > > > > >> > > >> for
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > netty4
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x
> branch
> > > > simply
> > > > > >> so
> > > > > >> > we
> > > > > >> > > >> can
> > > > > >> > > >> > > start
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize
> > > that
> > > > a
> > > > > >> > change
> > > > > >> > > >> this
> > > > > >> > > >> > > big
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > is
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open
> > to
> > > > > other
> > > > > >> > > >> opinions.
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST,
> > > Enrico
> > > > > >> > > Olivelli <
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a
> > > > > Salesforce
> > > > > >> > > there
> > > > > >> > > >> is
> > > > > >> > > >> > > some
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better
> > > > performances
> > > > > >> > using
> > > > > >> > > >> > native
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then
> > continue
> > > > the
> > > > > >> work
> > > > > >> > > >> from
> > > > > >> > > >> > it
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely
> ?
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4
> (from
> > > > Yahoo
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > now
> > > > > >> > > >> from
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for
> > > 4.6.x.
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > >> > > --
> > > > > >> > > >> > > Jvrao
> > > > > >> > > >> > > ---
> > > > > >> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then
> > they
> > > > > fight
> > > > > >> > you,
> > > > > >> > > >> then
> > > > > >> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > --
> > > > > >> > > > Jvrao
> > > > > >> > > > ---
> > > > > >> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
> > fight
> > > > > you,
> > > > > >> > then
> > > > > >> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > --
> > > > > >> > > Jvrao
> > > > > >> > > ---
> > > > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
> fight
> > > > you,
> > > > > >> then
> > > > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > --
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Jvrao
> > > > > >> ---
> > > > > >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> > you,
> > > > then
> > > > > >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Jvrao
---
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sijie,
> Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
> Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeting
> was to get Netty 4.1 in in 4.5
> I think that most of the problem is that you local fork actually is based
> on Netty 3, as we recently discussed about the inclusion of the reference
> to Netty 3 HashedWheelTimer in one "public" API.
>
> How can we go on ? Merge Twitter/DistributedLog first and than upgrade to
> Netty and merge Yahoo work or interleave the changes ?
>
My take here is that we should go ahead with merging netty4 first. We are
okay to rebase the change and merge it later.
>
> From my point of view I cannot give any good suggestion because I don't
> know the amount of work to be merged from all the three major forks.
>
> My two cents
>
> - Enrico
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-03-07 3:23 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>:
>
> > I need to catch up a bit about this thread.
> >
> > for my understanding, the question is shall we include netty 4.x upgrade
> in
> > BK 4.5 release or shall we push to 4.6?
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have just sent an email to JV
> > >
> > > 2017-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> > >
> > > > Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and
> > just
> > > > waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Bobby
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the initial
> > SSL
> > > > patch.
> > > >
> > > > I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current
> > > > master.
> > > >
> > > > See you at the meeting
> > > >
> > > > -- Enrico
> > > >
> > > > 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok see you tomorrow
> > > > >
> > > > > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > jujjuri@gmail.com>
> > > > ha
> > > > > scritto:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday.
> > > > tomorrow
> > > > >> 8 AM PST.
> > > > >> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > - Bobby
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli
> <
> > > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today,
> > Thursday
> > > or
> > > > >> on
> > > > >> > Friday?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >> ha
> > > > >> > scritto:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's
> > > > meeting.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > > >> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you
> respond?
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/
> delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > >> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> It depends on the "host".
> > > > >> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually
> > we
> > > > use
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > >> room
> > > > >> > > >> linked at
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > > > >> > Community+Meetings
> > > > >> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to
> drive/host
> > > the
> > > > >> > > meeting
> > > > >> > > >> ?
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > >> >:
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time
> > there
> > > > was
> > > > >> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be
> sure
> > I
> > > > join
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > >> right
> > > > >> > > >> > one this time.
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> > - Bobby
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico
> > > > Olivelli <
> > > > >> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > > > >> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> > Enrico
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > > >> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > >:
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing
> > > Enrico's
> > > > >> > patch.
> > > > >> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch
> > > > kishore
> > > > >> > has
> > > > >> > > >> takes
> > > > >> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > > >> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If
> others
> > > > have a
> > > > >> > > >> different
> > > > >> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the
> > JIRA.
> > > > I
> > > > >> > want
> > > > >> > > to
> > > > >> > > >> > make
> > > > >> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST,
> Bobby
> > > > Evans
> > > > >> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy
> > to
> > > > give
> > > > >> > it a
> > > > >> > > >> try.
> > > > >> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it
> back
> > > > >> anyways.
> > > > >> > > >> Our
> > > > >> > > >> > > code
> > > > >> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look
> at
> > > > 4.1.x
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > see
> > > > >> > > >> > what
> > > > >> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST,
> Enrico
> > > > >> > Olivelli <
> > > > >> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for
> > all
> > > > of
> > > > >> my
> > > > >> > > >> > projects
> > > > >> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > > > >> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > > > >> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x)
> > who
> > > > can
> > > > >> > take
> > > > >> > > >> care
> > > > >> > > >> > of
> > > > >> > > >> > > > the first port ?
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > Enrico
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > > > >> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > > >> > > >> >:
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather
> > then
> > > > >> later.
> > > > >> > > >> > Simply
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a
> > while
> > > in
> > > > >> > > >> production
> > > > >> > > >> > so
> > > > >> > > >> > > > we
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis
> of
> > a
> > > > lot
> > > > >> of
> > > > >> > > >> other
> > > > >> > > >> > > > patches
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a
> handful
> > > of
> > > > >> > patches
> > > > >> > > >> to
> > > > >> > > >> > > push
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more
> > > > >> difficult
> > > > >> > if
> > > > >> > > >> not
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to
> wait
> > > > until
> > > > >> > 4.6.x
> > > > >> > > >> for
> > > > >> > > >> > > > netty4
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch
> > > simply
> > > > >> so
> > > > >> > we
> > > > >> > > >> can
> > > > >> > > >> > > start
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize
> > that
> > > a
> > > > >> > change
> > > > >> > > >> this
> > > > >> > > >> > > big
> > > > >> > > >> > > > is
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open
> to
> > > > other
> > > > >> > > >> opinions.
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST,
> > Enrico
> > > > >> > > Olivelli <
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a
> > > > Salesforce
> > > > >> > > there
> > > > >> > > >> is
> > > > >> > > >> > > some
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better
> > > performances
> > > > >> > using
> > > > >> > > >> > native
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then
> continue
> > > the
> > > > >> work
> > > > >> > > >> from
> > > > >> > > >> > it
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from
> > > Yahoo
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > now
> > > > >> > > >> from
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for
> > 4.6.x.
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > >> > > Jvrao
> > > > >> > > >> > > ---
> > > > >> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then
> they
> > > > fight
> > > > >> > you,
> > > > >> > > >> then
> > > > >> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > --
> > > > >> > > > Jvrao
> > > > >> > > > ---
> > > > >> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
> fight
> > > > you,
> > > > >> > then
> > > > >> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > Jvrao
> > > > >> > > ---
> > > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> > > you,
> > > > >> then
> > > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Jvrao
> > > > >> ---
> > > > >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> you,
> > > then
> > > > >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > > >>
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Sijie,
Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeting
was to get Netty 4.1 in in 4.5
I think that most of the problem is that you local fork actually is based
on Netty 3, as we recently discussed about the inclusion of the reference
to Netty 3 HashedWheelTimer in one "public" API.
How can we go on ? Merge Twitter/DistributedLog first and than upgrade to
Netty and merge Yahoo work or interleave the changes ?
From my point of view I cannot give any good suggestion because I don't
know the amount of work to be merged from all the three major forks.
My two cents
- Enrico
2017-03-07 3:23 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>:
> I need to catch up a bit about this thread.
>
> for my understanding, the question is shall we include netty 4.x upgrade in
> BK 4.5 release or shall we push to 4.6?
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have just sent an email to JV
> >
> > 2017-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and
> just
> > > waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Bobby
> > >
> > > On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the initial
> SSL
> > > patch.
> > >
> > > I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current
> > > master.
> > >
> > > See you at the meeting
> > >
> > > -- Enrico
> > >
> > > 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Ok see you tomorrow
> > > >
> > > > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> jujjuri@gmail.com>
> > > ha
> > > > scritto:
> > > >
> > > >> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday.
> > > tomorrow
> > > >> 8 AM PST.
> > > >> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > >> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - Bobby
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today,
> Thursday
> > or
> > > >> on
> > > >> > Friday?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> ha
> > > >> > scritto:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's
> > > meeting.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > >> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > >> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> It depends on the "host".
> > > >> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually
> we
> > > use
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > >> room
> > > >> > > >> linked at
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > > >> > Community+Meetings
> > > >> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host
> > the
> > > >> > > meeting
> > > >> > > >> ?
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > >> >:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time
> there
> > > was
> > > >> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure
> I
> > > join
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > >> right
> > > >> > > >> > one this time.
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > - Bobby
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico
> > > Olivelli <
> > > >> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > > >> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > Enrico
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > >> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > >> > > >:
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing
> > Enrico's
> > > >> > patch.
> > > >> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch
> > > kishore
> > > >> > has
> > > >> > > >> takes
> > > >> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > >> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others
> > > have a
> > > >> > > >> different
> > > >> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the
> JIRA.
> > > I
> > > >> > want
> > > >> > > to
> > > >> > > >> > make
> > > >> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby
> > > Evans
> > > >> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy
> to
> > > give
> > > >> > it a
> > > >> > > >> try.
> > > >> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back
> > > >> anyways.
> > > >> > > >> Our
> > > >> > > >> > > code
> > > >> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at
> > > 4.1.x
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > see
> > > >> > > >> > what
> > > >> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
> > > >> > Olivelli <
> > > >> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for
> all
> > > of
> > > >> my
> > > >> > > >> > projects
> > > >> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > > >> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > > >> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x)
> who
> > > can
> > > >> > take
> > > >> > > >> care
> > > >> > > >> > of
> > > >> > > >> > > > the first port ?
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > Enrico
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > > >> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > >> > > >> >:
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather
> then
> > > >> later.
> > > >> > > >> > Simply
> > > >> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a
> while
> > in
> > > >> > > >> production
> > > >> > > >> > so
> > > >> > > >> > > > we
> > > >> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of
> a
> > > lot
> > > >> of
> > > >> > > >> other
> > > >> > > >> > > > patches
> > > >> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful
> > of
> > > >> > patches
> > > >> > > >> to
> > > >> > > >> > > push
> > > >> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more
> > > >> difficult
> > > >> > if
> > > >> > > >> not
> > > >> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait
> > > until
> > > >> > 4.6.x
> > > >> > > >> for
> > > >> > > >> > > > netty4
> > > >> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch
> > simply
> > > >> so
> > > >> > we
> > > >> > > >> can
> > > >> > > >> > > start
> > > >> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize
> that
> > a
> > > >> > change
> > > >> > > >> this
> > > >> > > >> > > big
> > > >> > > >> > > > is
> > > >> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to
> > > other
> > > >> > > >> opinions.
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST,
> Enrico
> > > >> > > Olivelli <
> > > >> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > >> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a
> > > Salesforce
> > > >> > > there
> > > >> > > >> is
> > > >> > > >> > > some
> > > >> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better
> > performances
> > > >> > using
> > > >> > > >> > native
> > > >> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue
> > the
> > > >> work
> > > >> > > >> from
> > > >> > > >> > it
> > > >> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > >> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from
> > Yahoo
> > > >> and
> > > >> > now
> > > >> > > >> from
> > > >> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for
> 4.6.x.
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > >> > > Jvrao
> > > >> > > >> > > ---
> > > >> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
> > > fight
> > > >> > you,
> > > >> > > >> then
> > > >> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > > Jvrao
> > > >> > > > ---
> > > >> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> > > you,
> > > >> > then
> > > >> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > Jvrao
> > > >> > > ---
> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> > you,
> > > >> then
> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Jvrao
> > > >> ---
> > > >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> > then
> > > >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > >>
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>.
I need to catch up a bit about this thread.
for my understanding, the question is shall we include netty 4.x upgrade in
BK 4.5 release or shall we push to 4.6?
- Sijie
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have just sent an email to JV
>
> 2017-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
>
> > Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and just
> > waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
> >
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the initial SSL
> > patch.
> >
> > I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current
> > master.
> >
> > See you at the meeting
> >
> > -- Enrico
> >
> > 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Ok see you tomorrow
> > >
> > > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>
> > ha
> > > scritto:
> > >
> > >> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday.
> > tomorrow
> > >> 8 AM PST.
> > >> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans
> > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > - Bobby
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday
> or
> > >> on
> > >> > Friday?
> > >> >
> > >> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> jujjuri@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> ha
> > >> > scritto:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's
> > meeting.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > >> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > >> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> It depends on the "host".
> > >> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we
> > use
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> room
> > >> > > >> linked at
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > >> > Community+Meetings
> > >> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host
> the
> > >> > > meeting
> > >> > > >> ?
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> >:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there
> > was
> > >> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I
> > join
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> right
> > >> > > >> > one this time.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > - Bobby
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico
> > Olivelli <
> > >> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > >> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Enrico
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > >> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > >> > > >:
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing
> Enrico's
> > >> > patch.
> > >> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch
> > kishore
> > >> > has
> > >> > > >> takes
> > >> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > >> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others
> > have a
> > >> > > >> different
> > >> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA.
> > I
> > >> > want
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > >> > make
> > >> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby
> > Evans
> > >> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to
> > give
> > >> > it a
> > >> > > >> try.
> > >> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back
> > >> anyways.
> > >> > > >> Our
> > >> > > >> > > code
> > >> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at
> > 4.1.x
> > >> and
> > >> > > see
> > >> > > >> > what
> > >> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
> > >> > Olivelli <
> > >> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all
> > of
> > >> my
> > >> > > >> > projects
> > >> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > >> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > >> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who
> > can
> > >> > take
> > >> > > >> care
> > >> > > >> > of
> > >> > > >> > > > the first port ?
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > Enrico
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > >> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> > > >> >:
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then
> > >> later.
> > >> > > >> > Simply
> > >> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while
> in
> > >> > > >> production
> > >> > > >> > so
> > >> > > >> > > > we
> > >> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a
> > lot
> > >> of
> > >> > > >> other
> > >> > > >> > > > patches
> > >> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful
> of
> > >> > patches
> > >> > > >> to
> > >> > > >> > > push
> > >> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more
> > >> difficult
> > >> > if
> > >> > > >> not
> > >> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait
> > until
> > >> > 4.6.x
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > > >> > > > netty4
> > >> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch
> simply
> > >> so
> > >> > we
> > >> > > >> can
> > >> > > >> > > start
> > >> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that
> a
> > >> > change
> > >> > > >> this
> > >> > > >> > > big
> > >> > > >> > > > is
> > >> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to
> > other
> > >> > > >> opinions.
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
> > >> > > Olivelli <
> > >> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > >> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a
> > Salesforce
> > >> > > there
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > > some
> > >> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better
> performances
> > >> > using
> > >> > > >> > native
> > >> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue
> the
> > >> work
> > >> > > >> from
> > >> > > >> > it
> > >> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > >> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from
> Yahoo
> > >> and
> > >> > now
> > >> > > >> from
> > >> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > --
> > >> > > >> > > Jvrao
> > >> > > >> > > ---
> > >> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
> > fight
> > >> > you,
> > >> > > >> then
> > >> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > > Jvrao
> > >> > > > ---
> > >> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> > you,
> > >> > then
> > >> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Jvrao
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> you,
> > >> then
> > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >> > >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jvrao
> > >> ---
> > >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then
> > >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >>
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >
> >
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
I have just sent an email to JV
2017-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and just
> waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the initial SSL
> patch.
>
> I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current
> master.
>
> See you at the meeting
>
> -- Enrico
>
> 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Ok see you tomorrow
> >
> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>
> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> >> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday.
> tomorrow
> >> 8 AM PST.
> >> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans
> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - Bobby
> >> >
> >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or
> >> on
> >> > Friday?
> >> >
> >> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujjuri@gmail.com
> >
> >> ha
> >> > scritto:
> >> >
> >> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's
> meeting.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> >> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> >> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> It depends on the "host".
> >> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we
> use
> >> the
> >> > > >> room
> >> > > >> linked at
> >> > > >>
> >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >> > Community+Meetings
> >> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
> >> > > meeting
> >> > > >> ?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> >:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there
> was
> >> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I
> join
> >> > the
> >> > > >> right
> >> > > >> > one this time.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > - Bobby
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico
> Olivelli <
> >> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Enrico
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> >> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> >> > > >:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's
> >> > patch.
> >> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch
> kishore
> >> > has
> >> > > >> takes
> >> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> >> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others
> have a
> >> > > >> different
> >> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA.
> I
> >> > want
> >> > > to
> >> > > >> > make
> >> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby
> Evans
> >> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to
> give
> >> > it a
> >> > > >> try.
> >> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back
> >> anyways.
> >> > > >> Our
> >> > > >> > > code
> >> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at
> 4.1.x
> >> and
> >> > > see
> >> > > >> > what
> >> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
> >> > Olivelli <
> >> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all
> of
> >> my
> >> > > >> > projects
> >> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> >> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> >> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who
> can
> >> > take
> >> > > >> care
> >> > > >> > of
> >> > > >> > > > the first port ?
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > Enrico
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> >> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> > > >> >:
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then
> >> later.
> >> > > >> > Simply
> >> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
> >> > > >> production
> >> > > >> > so
> >> > > >> > > > we
> >> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a
> lot
> >> of
> >> > > >> other
> >> > > >> > > > patches
> >> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of
> >> > patches
> >> > > >> to
> >> > > >> > > push
> >> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more
> >> difficult
> >> > if
> >> > > >> not
> >> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait
> until
> >> > 4.6.x
> >> > > >> for
> >> > > >> > > > netty4
> >> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply
> >> so
> >> > we
> >> > > >> can
> >> > > >> > > start
> >> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a
> >> > change
> >> > > >> this
> >> > > >> > > big
> >> > > >> > > > is
> >> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to
> other
> >> > > >> opinions.
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
> >> > > Olivelli <
> >> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> >> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a
> Salesforce
> >> > > there
> >> > > >> is
> >> > > >> > > some
> >> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances
> >> > using
> >> > > >> > native
> >> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the
> >> work
> >> > > >> from
> >> > > >> > it
> >> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> >> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo
> >> and
> >> > now
> >> > > >> from
> >> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > --
> >> > > >> > > Jvrao
> >> > > >> > > ---
> >> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
> fight
> >> > you,
> >> > > >> then
> >> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Jvrao
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> you,
> >> > then
> >> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Jvrao
> >> > > ---
> >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> >> then
> >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >> > >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jvrao
> >> ---
> >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >>
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and just waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
- Bobby
On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the initial SSL patch.
I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current master.
See you at the meeting
-- Enrico
2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
> Ok see you tomorrow
>
> Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday. tomorrow
>> 8 AM PST.
>> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Bobby
>> >
>> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or
>> on
>> > Friday?
>> >
>> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>
>> ha
>> > scritto:
>> >
>> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
>> > > >
>> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
>> eolivelli@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> It depends on the "host".
>> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use
>> the
>> > > >> room
>> > > >> linked at
>> > > >>
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> > Community+Meetings
>> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
>> > > meeting
>> > > >> ?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> >:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
>> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join
>> > the
>> > > >> right
>> > > >> > one this time.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > - Bobby
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
>> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Enrico
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>> > jujjuri@gmail.com
>> > > >:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's
>> > patch.
>> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore
>> > has
>> > > >> takes
>> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
>> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
>> > > >> different
>> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I
>> > want
>> > > to
>> > > >> > make
>> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > - Bobby
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
>> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give
>> > it a
>> > > >> try.
>> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back
>> anyways.
>> > > >> Our
>> > > >> > > code
>> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x
>> and
>> > > see
>> > > >> > what
>> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > - Bobby
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
>> > Olivelli <
>> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of
>> my
>> > > >> > projects
>> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
>> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
>> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can
>> > take
>> > > >> care
>> > > >> > of
>> > > >> > > > the first port ?
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Enrico
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
>> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> > > >> >:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then
>> later.
>> > > >> > Simply
>> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
>> > > >> production
>> > > >> > so
>> > > >> > > > we
>> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot
>> of
>> > > >> other
>> > > >> > > > patches
>> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of
>> > patches
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> > > push
>> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more
>> difficult
>> > if
>> > > >> not
>> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until
>> > 4.6.x
>> > > >> for
>> > > >> > > > netty4
>> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply
>> so
>> > we
>> > > >> can
>> > > >> > > start
>> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a
>> > change
>> > > >> this
>> > > >> > > big
>> > > >> > > > is
>> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
>> > > >> opinions.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
>> > > Olivelli <
>> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
>> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce
>> > > there
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> > > some
>> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances
>> > using
>> > > >> > native
>> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the
>> work
>> > > >> from
>> > > >> > it
>> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
>> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo
>> and
>> > now
>> > > >> from
>> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > --
>> > > >> > > Jvrao
>> > > >> > > ---
>> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
>> > you,
>> > > >> then
>> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Jvrao
>> > > > ---
>> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
>> > then
>> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jvrao
>> > > ---
>> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
>> then
>> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>> > >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jvrao
>> ---
>> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
>> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>>
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Thank you @Kishore for review the initial SSL patch.
I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current master.
See you at the meeting
-- Enrico
2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>:
> Ok see you tomorrow
>
> Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday. tomorrow
>> 8 AM PST.
>> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Bobby
>> >
>> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or
>> on
>> > Friday?
>> >
>> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>
>> ha
>> > scritto:
>> >
>> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
>> > > >
>> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
>> eolivelli@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> It depends on the "host".
>> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use
>> the
>> > > >> room
>> > > >> linked at
>> > > >>
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> > Community+Meetings
>> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
>> > > meeting
>> > > >> ?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> >:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
>> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join
>> > the
>> > > >> right
>> > > >> > one this time.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > - Bobby
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
>> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Enrico
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
>> > jujjuri@gmail.com
>> > > >:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's
>> > patch.
>> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore
>> > has
>> > > >> takes
>> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
>> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
>> > > >> different
>> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I
>> > want
>> > > to
>> > > >> > make
>> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > - Bobby
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
>> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give
>> > it a
>> > > >> try.
>> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back
>> anyways.
>> > > >> Our
>> > > >> > > code
>> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x
>> and
>> > > see
>> > > >> > what
>> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > - Bobby
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
>> > Olivelli <
>> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of
>> my
>> > > >> > projects
>> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
>> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
>> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can
>> > take
>> > > >> care
>> > > >> > of
>> > > >> > > > the first port ?
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Enrico
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
>> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> > > >> >:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then
>> later.
>> > > >> > Simply
>> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
>> > > >> production
>> > > >> > so
>> > > >> > > > we
>> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot
>> of
>> > > >> other
>> > > >> > > > patches
>> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of
>> > patches
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> > > push
>> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more
>> difficult
>> > if
>> > > >> not
>> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until
>> > 4.6.x
>> > > >> for
>> > > >> > > > netty4
>> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply
>> so
>> > we
>> > > >> can
>> > > >> > > start
>> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a
>> > change
>> > > >> this
>> > > >> > > big
>> > > >> > > > is
>> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
>> > > >> opinions.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
>> > > Olivelli <
>> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
>> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce
>> > > there
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> > > some
>> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances
>> > using
>> > > >> > native
>> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the
>> work
>> > > >> from
>> > > >> > it
>> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
>> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo
>> and
>> > now
>> > > >> from
>> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > --
>> > > >> > > Jvrao
>> > > >> > > ---
>> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
>> > you,
>> > > >> then
>> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Jvrao
>> > > > ---
>> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
>> > then
>> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jvrao
>> > > ---
>> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
>> then
>> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>> > >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jvrao
>> ---
>> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
>> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>>
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Ok see you tomorrow
Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:
> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday. tomorrow
> 8 AM PST.
> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
> >
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or on
> > Friday?
> >
> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>
> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> > > >
> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It depends on the "host".
> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use
> the
> > > >> room
> > > >> linked at
> > > >>
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > Community+Meetings
> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> > > >>
> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
> > > meeting
> > > >> ?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >:
> > > >>
> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join
> > the
> > > >> right
> > > >> > one this time.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - Bobby
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Enrico
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's
> > patch.
> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore
> > has
> > > >> takes
> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> > > >> different
> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I
> > want
> > > to
> > > >> > make
> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give
> > it a
> > > >> try.
> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back
> anyways.
> > > >> Our
> > > >> > > code
> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x
> and
> > > see
> > > >> > what
> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > - Bobby
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
> > Olivelli <
> > > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of
> my
> > > >> > projects
> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > > >> > > > to Netty 4
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can
> > take
> > > >> care
> > > >> > of
> > > >> > > > the first port ?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Enrico
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > > >> >:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then
> later.
> > > >> > Simply
> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
> > > >> production
> > > >> > so
> > > >> > > > we
> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot
> of
> > > >> other
> > > >> > > > patches
> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of
> > patches
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > push
> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult
> > if
> > > >> not
> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until
> > 4.6.x
> > > >> for
> > > >> > > > netty4
> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so
> > we
> > > >> can
> > > >> > > start
> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a
> > change
> > > >> this
> > > >> > > big
> > > >> > > > is
> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
> > > >> opinions.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > - Bobby
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
> > > Olivelli <
> > > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce
> > > there
> > > >> is
> > > >> > > some
> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances
> > using
> > > >> > native
> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the
> work
> > > >> from
> > > >> > it
> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and
> > now
> > > >> from
> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > Jvrao
> > > >> > > ---
> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> > you,
> > > >> then
> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jvrao
> > > > ---
> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> > then
> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jvrao
> > > ---
> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then
> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
--
-- Enrico Olivelli
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday. tomorrow
8 AM PST.
Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or on
> Friday?
>
> Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > jujjuri@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> > >
> > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> It depends on the "host".
> > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the
> > >> room
> > >> linked at
> > >>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> Community+Meetings
> > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> > >>
> > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> > >>
> > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
> > meeting
> > >> ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> > >>
> > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
> > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join
> the
> > >> right
> > >> > one this time.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > - Bobby
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> > >> >
> > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Enrico
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> jujjuri@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's
> patch.
> > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore
> has
> > >> takes
> > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> > >> different
> > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I
> want
> > to
> > >> > make
> > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give
> it a
> > >> try.
> > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways.
> > >> Our
> > >> > > code
> > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and
> > see
> > >> > what
> > >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico
> Olivelli <
> > >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my
> > >> > projects
> > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > >> > > > to Netty 4
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can
> take
> > >> care
> > >> > of
> > >> > > > the first port ?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Enrico
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> > <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >> >:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.
> > >> > Simply
> > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
> > >> production
> > >> > so
> > >> > > > we
> > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of
> > >> other
> > >> > > > patches
> > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of
> patches
> > >> to
> > >> > > push
> > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult
> if
> > >> not
> > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until
> 4.6.x
> > >> for
> > >> > > > netty4
> > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so
> we
> > >> can
> > >> > > start
> > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a
> change
> > >> this
> > >> > > big
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
> > >> opinions.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > - Bobby
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
> > Olivelli <
> > >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce
> > there
> > >> is
> > >> > > some
> > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances
> using
> > >> > native
> > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Open questions are:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work
> > >> from
> > >> > it
> > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and
> now
> > >> from
> > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > -- Enrico
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Jvrao
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight
> you,
> > >> then
> > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jvrao
> > > ---
> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then
> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jvrao
> > ---
> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>
--
Jvrao
---
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
- Bobby
On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or on Friday?
Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:
> Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> jujjuri@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> >
> > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It depends on the "host".
> >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the
> >> room
> >> linked at
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings
> >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> >>
> >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> >>
> >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
> meeting
> >> ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> >>
> >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
> >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the
> >> right
> >> > one this time.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - Bobby
> >> >
> >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> >> >
> >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Enrico
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujjuri@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >
> >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
> >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has
> >> takes
> >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> > >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> >> different
> >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want
> to
> >> > make
> >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a
> >> try.
> >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways.
> >> Our
> >> > > code
> >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and
> see
> >> > what
> >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my
> >> > projects
> >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> >> > > > to Netty 4
> >> > > >
> >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take
> >> care
> >> > of
> >> > > > the first port ?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Enrico
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> >:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.
> >> > Simply
> >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
> >> production
> >> > so
> >> > > > we
> >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of
> >> other
> >> > > > patches
> >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches
> >> to
> >> > > push
> >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if
> >> not
> >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x
> >> for
> >> > > > netty4
> >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we
> >> can
> >> > > start
> >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change
> >> this
> >> > > big
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
> >> opinions.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - Bobby
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
> Olivelli <
> >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce
> there
> >> is
> >> > > some
> >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using
> >> > native
> >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Open questions are:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work
> >> from
> >> > it
> >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now
> >> from
> >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > -- Enrico
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Jvrao
> >> > > ---
> >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> >> then
> >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jvrao
> > ---
> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
--
-- Enrico Olivelli
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or on Friday?
Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:
> Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> jujjuri@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
> >
> > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It depends on the "host".
> >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the
> >> room
> >> linked at
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings
> >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
> >>
> >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
> >>
> >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the
> meeting
> >> ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> >>
> >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
> >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the
> >> right
> >> > one this time.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - Bobby
> >> >
> >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> >> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> >> >
> >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Enrico
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujjuri@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >
> >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
> >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has
> >> takes
> >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> >> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> > >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> >> different
> >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want
> to
> >> > make
> >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a
> >> try.
> >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways.
> >> Our
> >> > > code
> >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and
> see
> >> > what
> >> > > > differences there are with the API.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> >> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my
> >> > projects
> >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> >> > > > to Netty 4
> >> > > >
> >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take
> >> care
> >> > of
> >> > > > the first port ?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Enrico
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans
> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >> >:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.
> >> > Simply
> >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
> >> production
> >> > so
> >> > > > we
> >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of
> >> other
> >> > > > patches
> >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches
> >> to
> >> > > push
> >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if
> >> not
> >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x
> >> for
> >> > > > netty4
> >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we
> >> can
> >> > > start
> >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change
> >> this
> >> > > big
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
> >> opinions.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - Bobby
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico
> Olivelli <
> >> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce
> there
> >> is
> >> > > some
> >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using
> >> > native
> >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > How the work is going ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Open questions are:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work
> >> from
> >> > it
> >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now
> >> from
> >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > -- Enrico
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Jvrao
> >> > > ---
> >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> >> then
> >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jvrao
> > ---
> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
--
-- Enrico Olivelli
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>.
Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujjuri@gmail.com
> wrote:
> If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
>
> https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It depends on the "host".
>> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the
>> room
>> linked at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings
>> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
>>
>> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
>>
>> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the meeting
>> ?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
>>
>> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
>> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the
>> right
>> > one this time.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Bobby
>> >
>> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
>> >
>> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
>> >
>> >
>> > Enrico
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
>> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has
>> takes
>> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
>> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
>> different
>> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to
>> > make
>> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > - Bobby
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
>> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a
>> try.
>> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways.
>> Our
>> > > code
>> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see
>> > what
>> > > > differences there are with the API.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Bobby
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my
>> > projects
>> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
>> > > > to Netty 4
>> > > >
>> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
>> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take
>> care
>> > of
>> > > > the first port ?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Enrico
>> > > >
>> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>> >:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.
>> > Simply
>> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
>> production
>> > so
>> > > > we
>> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of
>> other
>> > > > patches
>> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches
>> to
>> > > push
>> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if
>> not
>> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x
>> for
>> > > > netty4
>> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we
>> can
>> > > start
>> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change
>> this
>> > > big
>> > > > is
>> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
>> opinions.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Bobby
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
>> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there
>> is
>> > > some
>> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using
>> > native
>> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > How the work is going ?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Open questions are:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>> > > > >
>> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work
>> from
>> > it
>> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
>> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now
>> from
>> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -- Enrico
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jvrao
>> > > ---
>> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
>> then
>> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
>
>
--
Jvrao
---
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>.
If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond?
https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It depends on the "host".
> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the room
> linked at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings
> (hosted by Siji @Twitter)
>
> I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
>
> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the meeting ?
>
>
>
> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
>
> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the
> right
> > one this time.
> >
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
> >
> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> >
> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has
> takes
> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> different
> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to
> > make
> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Bobby
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a
> try.
> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our
> > > code
> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see
> > what
> > > > differences there are with the API.
> > > >
> > > > - Bobby
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my
> > projects
> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > > > to Netty 4
> > > >
> > > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take
> care
> > of
> > > > the first port ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Enrico
> > > >
> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >:
> > > >
> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.
> > Simply
> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in
> production
> > so
> > > > we
> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other
> > > > patches
> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to
> > > push
> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x
> for
> > > > netty4
> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can
> > > start
> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change
> this
> > > big
> > > > is
> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other
> opinions.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Bobby
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there
> is
> > > some
> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using
> > native
> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > > > >
> > > > > How the work is going ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Open questions are:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > > > >
> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from
> > it
> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now
> from
> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > > > >
> > > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Enrico
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jvrao
> > > ---
> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then
> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >
> >
>
--
Jvrao
---
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
It depends on the "host".
Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the room
linked at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings
(hosted by Siji @Twitter)
I don't know whether Sijie will attend.
If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the meeting ?
2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was
> confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the right
> one this time.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
>
> I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
>
>
> Enrico
>
>
> 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
> > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has takes
> > to Netty 4.1.7.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a different
> > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to
> make
> > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Bobby
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a try.
> > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our
> > code
> > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see
> what
> > > differences there are with the API.
> > >
> > > - Bobby
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my
> projects
> > > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > > to Netty 4
> > >
> > > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care
> of
> > > the first port ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> > >
> > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.
> Simply
> > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in production
> so
> > > we
> > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other
> > > patches
> > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to
> > push
> > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for
> > > netty4
> > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can
> > start
> > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this
> > big
> > > is
> > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Bobby
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is
> > some
> > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using
> native
> > > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > > >
> > > > How the work is going ?
> > > >
> > > > Open questions are:
> > > >
> > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > > >
> > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from
> it
> > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > > >
> > > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > > >
> > > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > > >
> > > > -- Enrico
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jvrao
> > ---
> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the right one this time.
- Bobby
On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:Great!
I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
Enrico
2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>:
> Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
> I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has takes
> to Netty 4.1.7.
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a different
> > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to make
> > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> >
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a try.
> > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our
> code
> > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what
> > differences there are with the API.
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects
> > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > to Netty 4
> >
> > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
> > the first port ?
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply
> > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so
> > we
> > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other
> > patches
> > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to
> push
> > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for
> > netty4
> > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can
> start
> > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this
> big
> > is
> > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Bobby
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is
> some
> > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
> > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > >
> > > How the work is going ?
> > >
> > > Open questions are:
> > >
> > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > >
> > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
> > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > >
> > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > >
> > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > >
> > > -- Enrico
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Great!
I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-2-24+Meeting+notes
Enrico
2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>:
> Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
> I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has takes
> to Netty 4.1.7.
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a different
> > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to make
> > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> >
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a try.
> > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our
> code
> > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what
> > differences there are with the API.
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects
> > and I am very +1 on the switch
> > to Netty 4
> >
> > @Sijie what do you think ?
> > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
> > the first port ?
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply
> > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so
> > we
> > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other
> > patches
> > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to
> push
> > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for
> > netty4
> > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can
> start
> > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this
> big
> > is
> > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Bobby
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is
> some
> > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
> > > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> > >
> > > How the work is going ?
> > >
> > > Open questions are:
> > >
> > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> > >
> > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
> > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> > >
> > > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> > >
> > > What are your current thoughts ?
> > >
> > > -- Enrico
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <ju...@gmail.com>.
Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch.
I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has takes
to Netty 4.1.7.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a different
> opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to make
> sure we have the backing of the community on this.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a try.
> Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our code
> is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what
> differences there are with the API.
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects
> and I am very +1 on the switch
> to Netty 4
>
> @Sijie what do you think ?
> If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
> the first port ?
>
>
> Enrico
>
> 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
>
> > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply
> > because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so
> we
> > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other
> patches
> > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to push
> > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for
> netty4
> > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can start
> > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this big
> is
> > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
> >
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
> > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
> > OpenSSL + netty 4.
> >
> > How the work is going ?
> >
> > Open questions are:
> >
> > 1) status of my current patch on SSL
> >
> > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
> > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
> >
> > 2) switch to Netty 4:
> > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
> >
> > What are your current thoughts ?
> >
> > -- Enrico
> >
>
--
Jvrao
---
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a different opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to make sure we have the backing of the community on this.
- Bobby
On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a try. Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our code is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what differences there are with the API.
- Bobby
On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects and I am very +1 on the switch
to Netty 4
@Sijie what do you think ?
If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
the first port ?
Enrico
2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply
> because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so we
> know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other patches
> we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to push
> back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for netty4
> then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can start
> to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this big is
> going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
> work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
> OpenSSL + netty 4.
>
> How the work is going ?
>
> Open questions are:
>
> 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>
> should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
> or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
>
> 2) switch to Netty 4:
> Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
>
> What are your current thoughts ?
>
> -- Enrico
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
I would be happy to give it a try. Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our code is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what differences there are with the API.
- Bobby
On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects and I am very +1 on the switch
to Netty 4
@Sijie what do you think ?
If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
the first port ?
Enrico
2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply
> because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so we
> know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other patches
> we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to push
> back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for netty4
> then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can start
> to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this big is
> going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
> work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
> OpenSSL + netty 4.
>
> How the work is going ?
>
> Open questions are:
>
> 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>
> should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
> or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
>
> 2) switch to Netty 4:
> Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
>
> What are your current thoughts ?
>
> -- Enrico
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects and I am very +1 on the switch
to Netty 4
@Sijie what do you think ?
If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
the first port ?
Enrico
2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply
> because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so we
> know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other patches
> we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to push
> back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for netty4
> then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can start
> to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this big is
> going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
> work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
> OpenSSL + netty 4.
>
> How the work is going ?
>
> Open questions are:
>
> 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>
> should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
> or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
>
> 2) switch to Netty 4:
> Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
>
> What are your current thoughts ?
>
> -- Enrico
>
Re: SSL and Netty 4/OpenSSL news
Posted by Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>.
I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so we know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other patches we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to push back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for netty4 then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can start to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this big is going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
- Bobby
On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
OpenSSL + netty 4.
How the work is going ?
Open questions are:
1) status of my current patch on SSL
should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
2) switch to Netty 4:
Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
What are your current thoughts ?
-- Enrico