You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/02/16 03:14:10 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17106] New: -
File upload exceptions.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17106>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17106
File upload exceptions.
Summary: File upload exceptions.
Product: Commons
Version: 1.0 Alpha
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Other
Component: File Upload
AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: kevin@minshull.ca
I have been using the file upload for handling my requests and i quite like
what there is so far. The reason that i chose this over the servlets.com file
upload is because this is able to handle the file too large with an exception.
I am actively using it in the development of my website and in the testing and
development it works just as good as the servlets.com file upload so far. I
have not yet stressed it though.
However i would like to suggest to take one more step. I suggest you throw the
usual FileUploadException when "the request was rejected because it's size
exceeds the allowed range" and throwing something to the effect of a
FileUploadRequestException as "the request doesn't contain a multipart/form-
data..."
This is the reason that i chose the product, and am continuing to use it, but i
wish there was a more defined way to know about the size exception instead of
doing a string check on the exception message.
Thx for your time to read this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org