You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2012/02/21 03:39:35 UTC
[Vote] Make JDBM a side project
Hi,
we forked JDBM a few years ago because we had some modification to
include into it in order to be able to use it in Apacheds, as the JDBM
comminuty wasn't responsive. We made it a sub-module of the apcheds project.
Now, with the heavy changes Selcuk made on JDBM to include a MVCC layer
into it, we may want to make JDBM a side project. I suggest here that we
vote to move JDBM in its own project, as shared, studio or apacheds.
ApacheDS will still heavily depend on it.
So :
[ ] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
[ ] +/- 0 : does not matter too much/No opinion
[ ] -1 : Keep JDBM inside Apacheds atm.
Thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [Vote] Make JDBM a side project
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
[X] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 21 févr. 2012, at 03:39, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we forked JDBM a few years ago because we had some modification to include into it in order to be able to use it in Apacheds, as the JDBM comminuty wasn't responsive. We made it a sub-module of the apcheds project.
>
> Now, with the heavy changes Selcuk made on JDBM to include a MVCC layer into it, we may want to make JDBM a side project. I suggest here that we vote to move JDBM in its own project, as shared, studio or apacheds. ApacheDS will still heavily depend on it.
>
> So :
>
> [ ] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
> [ ] +/- 0 : does not matter too much/No opinion
> [ ] -1 : Keep JDBM inside Apacheds atm.
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
Re: [Vote] Make JDBM a side project
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>.
[X] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we forked JDBM a few years ago because we had some modification to include
> into it in order to be able to use it in Apacheds, as the JDBM comminuty
> wasn't responsive. We made it a sub-module of the apcheds project.
>
> Now, with the heavy changes Selcuk made on JDBM to include a MVCC layer into
> it, we may want to make JDBM a side project. I suggest here that we vote to
> move JDBM in its own project, as shared, studio or apacheds. ApacheDS will
> still heavily depend on it.
>
> So :
>
> [ ] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
> [ ] +/- 0 : does not matter too much/No opinion
> [ ] -1 : Keep JDBM inside Apacheds atm.
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
--
Kiran Ayyagari
Result : [Vote] Make JDBM a side project
Posted by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>.
[X] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
5 +1, no -1.
I'll create the sub-project.
Thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: [Vote] Make JDBM a side project
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we forked JDBM a few years ago because we had some modification to include
> into it in order to be able to use it in Apacheds, as the JDBM comminuty
> wasn't responsive. We made it a sub-module of the apcheds project.
>
> Now, with the heavy changes Selcuk made on JDBM to include a MVCC layer
> into it, we may want to make JDBM a side project. I suggest here that we
> vote to move JDBM in its own project, as shared, studio or apacheds.
> ApacheDS will still heavily depend on it.
>
> So :
>
> [X] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
>
+1
--
Best Regards,
-- Alex
Re: [Vote] Make JDBM a side project
Posted by Felix Knecht <fe...@otego.com>.
> [X] +1 : Make JDBM a separate project
Regards
Felix