Why DUL hit?

[Dan Barker <db...@visioncomm.net>]

My sister-in-law is using the appropriate outbound SMTP server. Why'd
SORBS_DUL misfire? (Oh, not misfire, but fire. The 65... Address is a
dial-up, but the 207... Is not. I wonder why SORBS has it listed?

Dan



HEADERS:

Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net [207.115.11.51] by
mail.visioncomm.net with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.15) id ACFE960008E; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:19:58 -0400
Received: from hubert382f6e2f
(adsl-065-012-175-061.sip.asm.bellsouth.net[65.12.175.61])
          by bellsouth.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP
          id <20070724211957H0100r3qbde>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:19:57 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [65.12.175.61]
From: "Linda Herreid" <lh...@bellsouth.net>
To: <pb...@visioncomm.com>
Subject: You gotta eat ya know ...
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:19:56 -0400
Message-ID: <00...@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C7CE16.DBD96B90"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcfOOGHWF0igQIbzQlq642w0zZ01Cw==
Content-Language: en-us

REPORT:

Content analysis details:   (6.1 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.1 HTML_90_100            BODY: Message is 90% to 100% HTML
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
                            [207.115.11.51 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
 1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS     RBL: Envelope sender in whois.rfc-ignorant.org
 1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
                            postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
-2.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list