SymbolConstants.SECURE_PAGE missing?

[Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>]

Hello,

I was trying to inject this symbol value into one of our pages, but it
appears to not be present in SymbolConstants.  Is this an oversight or is
this symbol not intended to be visible?

Thanks,

mrg

PS. If it matters, I'm on 5.4b26.

Re: SymbolConstants.SECURE_PAGE missing?

[Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>]

Hi Dimitris,

We have some previous code that was using BaseURLSource.getBaseURL() and
always passing true to it instead of if we were running secure or not.  I
thought I'd base the value on SECURE_PAGE instead of always being true.
 (Our apps are either non-SSL for local development or all-SSL for
testing/production.)

Thanks,

mrg


On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Dimitris Zenios <di...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> SECURE_PAGE is part of MetaDataConstants not SymbolConstants
>
> What exactly are you trying to achieve?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying to inject this symbol value into one of our pages, but it
> > appears to not be present in SymbolConstants.  Is this an oversight or is
> > this symbol not intended to be visible?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> > PS. If it matters, I'm on 5.4b26.
> >
>

Re: SymbolConstants.SECURE_PAGE missing?

[Dimitris Zenios <di...@gmail.com>]

Hi

SECURE_PAGE is part of MetaDataConstants not SymbolConstants

What exactly are you trying to achieve?

Thanks

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I was trying to inject this symbol value into one of our pages, but it
> appears to not be present in SymbolConstants.  Is this an oversight or is
> this symbol not intended to be visible?
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
> PS. If it matters, I'm on 5.4b26.
>