You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chukwa.apache.org by Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/19 21:41:49 UTC
Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
So let's see. We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
How are 444 and 442 going?
I can document the SocketTeeWriter.
I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.
Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
documentation accordingly.
--Ari
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi Ari,
>
> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>
> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
> added in 0.4 documentation.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>
>> --Ari
>
>
--
Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Posted by Jerome Boulon <jb...@netflix.com>.
Hi everyone,
I will not be able to release my stuff since I had to switch to something
else for the last month.
Could we have a sync on who/how chukwa is used today?
/Jerome.
On 1/19/10 12:41 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So let's see. We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
> How are 444 and 442 going?
>
> I can document the SocketTeeWriter.
>
> I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
> expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.
>
> Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
> documentation accordingly.
>
> --Ari
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ari,
>>
>> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
>> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>>
>> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
>> added in 0.4 documentation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
>>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
>>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>>
>>> --Ari
>>
>>
>
>
Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
Posted by Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com>.
440 is ready for commit, and 442 is already committed.
446 is proposed for review of the user command line interface, and needs to
be implemented to complete. I am taking on this one. Please vote before I
start to implement.
447, probably use junit or System.currentTImeMillis() to calculate where the
adaptor taking up most of the time. By eye examination, I don't see
anything that could be optimized to improve performance.
Regards,
Eric
On 1/19/10 12:41 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So let's see. We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
> How are 444 and 442 going?
>
> I can document the SocketTeeWriter.
>
> I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
> expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.
>
> Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
> documentation accordingly.
>
> --Ari
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ari,
>>
>> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to
>> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>>
>> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
>> added in 0.4 documentation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3
>>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been
>>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>>
>>> --Ari
>>
>>
>
>