You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by Bill Janssen <ja...@parc.com> on 2004/10/27 22:57:37 UTC
Re: new version of NewMultiFieldQueryParser
> I'm not sure this solution is very robust ....
Thanks, but I'm pretty sure it *is* robust. Can you please offer a
specific critique? Always happy to learn and improve :-).
> I think I already sent an email with a better code...
Pretty vague. Can you send a URL for that message in the archive?
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: new version of NewMultiFieldQueryParser
Posted by sergiu gordea <gs...@ifit.uni-klu.ac.at>.
Morus Walter wrote:
>Bill Janssen writes:
>
>
>>>Try to see the behavior if you want to have a single term query ....
>>>juat something like: "robust" .. and print out the query string ...
>>>
>>>
>>Sure, that works fine. For instance, if you have the three default
>>fields "title", "authors", and "contents", the one-word search
>>"robust" expands to
>>
>> title:foobar authors:foobar contents:foobar
>>
>>just as it should.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Try to see what is happening with Prefix, Wild, and Fuzzy searches ...
>>>
>>>
>>Good point. My older version (see below) found these, but the new one
>>doesn't. Oh, well, back to the working version. I knew there was some
>>reason getFieldQuery wasn't sufficient.
>>
>>
>>
>wouldn't it be better to go on and overwrite the methods creating these
>types of queries too?
>
>Morus
>
>
Yes that't what I wanted to suggest ...
The query parser work fine if you add all types of query parser ... but
it was not working correctly in the case of single tem.
Therefore I test this first and I create a Query by using the normal
MultifieldQueryParser.
Maybe is not the best solution but it works perfect ... and I had to
write just a few lines of code ....
Sergiu
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: new version of NewMultiFieldQueryParser
Posted by Morus Walter <mo...@tanto.de>.
Bill Janssen writes:
> > Try to see the behavior if you want to have a single term query ....
> > juat something like: "robust" .. and print out the query string ...
>
> Sure, that works fine. For instance, if you have the three default
> fields "title", "authors", and "contents", the one-word search
> "robust" expands to
>
> title:foobar authors:foobar contents:foobar
>
> just as it should.
>
> > Try to see what is happening with Prefix, Wild, and Fuzzy searches ...
>
> Good point. My older version (see below) found these, but the new one
> doesn't. Oh, well, back to the working version. I knew there was some
> reason getFieldQuery wasn't sufficient.
>
wouldn't it be better to go on and overwrite the methods creating these
types of queries too?
Morus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: new version of NewMultiFieldQueryParser
Posted by sergiu gordea <gs...@ifit.uni-klu.ac.at>.
Bill Janssen wrote:
>>I'm not sure this solution is very robust ....
>>
>>
>
>Thanks, but I'm pretty sure it *is* robust. Can you please offer a
>specific critique? Always happy to learn and improve :-).
>
>
Try to see the behavior if you want to have a single term query ....
juat something like: "robust" .. and print out the query string ...
Try to see what is happening with Prefix, Wild, and Fuzzy searches ...
:)
Sergiu
>
>
>>I think I already sent an email with a better code...
>>
>>
>
>Pretty vague. Can you send a URL for that message in the archive?
>
>Bill
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org