You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com> on 2015/11/16 21:29:16 UTC
[DISCUSS] Further development of ServiceMix 5
Hi
We have currently 2 active branches for ServiceMix 5 (K24x)
* 5.4.x - based on Camel 2.14.x
* 5.5.x - based on Camel 2.15.x
Do you think we should provide the next line 5.6.x based on Camel 2.16.x (like ServiceMix 6.1.x) or should we stop further development of ServiceMix 5 with line based on Camel 2.15.x? Wdyt?
Regards
Krzysztof
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/)
Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/)
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC (http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/)
33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/)
Re: [DISCUSS] Further development of ServiceMix 5
Posted by Sobkowiak Krzysztof <kr...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I think, it should be no problem with 5.6.x. I wanted to know whether someone expects this to be released.
Regards
Krzysztof
On 17.11.2015 07:47, Cristiano Costantini wrote:
> Hi,
> Having a 5.6.x based on Camel 2.16.x would be appreciated,
> anyway we plan to migrate to ServiceMix 6.x so even if a 5.6.x is released,
> we will adopt it only for a short period of time.
>
> But this is just one voice :-)
>
> Bye
> Cristiano
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Il giorno lun 16 nov 2015 alle ore 21:29 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
> krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> We have currently 2 active branches for ServiceMix 5 (K24x)
>>
>> * 5.4.x - based on Camel 2.14.x
>> * 5.5.x - based on Camel 2.15.x
>>
>> Do you think we should provide the next line 5.6.x based on Camel 2.16.x
>> (like ServiceMix 6.1.x) or should we stop further development of ServiceMix
>> 5 with line based on Camel 2.15.x? Wdyt?
>>
>> Regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect
>> Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/)
>> Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/)
>> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC (
>> http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/)
>>
>>
>> 33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/)
>>
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/)
Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/)
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC (http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/)
33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/)
Re: [DISCUSS] Further development of ServiceMix 5
Posted by Cristiano Costantini <cr...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Having a 5.6.x based on Camel 2.16.x would be appreciated,
anyway we plan to migrate to ServiceMix 6.x so even if a 5.6.x is released,
we will adopt it only for a short period of time.
But this is just one voice :-)
Bye
Cristiano
Il giorno lun 16 nov 2015 alle ore 21:29 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> We have currently 2 active branches for ServiceMix 5 (K24x)
>
> * 5.4.x - based on Camel 2.14.x
> * 5.5.x - based on Camel 2.15.x
>
> Do you think we should provide the next line 5.6.x based on Camel 2.16.x
> (like ServiceMix 6.1.x) or should we stop further development of ServiceMix
> 5 with line based on Camel 2.15.x? Wdyt?
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect
> Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/)
> Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/)
> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC (
> http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/)
>
>
> 33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/)
>