You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> on 2015/10/27 22:17:29 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
0.10.0:
The commit to be voted on:
ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
Branch:
release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint C2909CBF:
http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
The staging repository for this release can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
-------------------------------------------------------------
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 PMC votes are cast.
The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
===================================
The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc1:
ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required configuration keys
in flink-conf of binary distribution
874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to dependency
management
04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address pattern
16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in start-*-streaming.sh
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
It is supposed to show some general statistics about a job but it is
currently just a place holder. The accumulators are shown in the
overview. This page should be removed before the release.
Thanks,
Max
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
<va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No matter
> what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, parallelism=2,
> subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>
> Thanks!
> -Vasia.
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>>
>> Here is the new document:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>>
>> I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the new RC.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous one?
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
>> version
>> > > 0.10.0:
>> > >
>> > > The commit to be voted on:
>> > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> > >
>> > > Branch:
>> > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
>> > >
>> > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> > >
>> > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
>> C2909CBF:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> > >
>> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> > least
>> > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > >
>> > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
>> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >
>> > > ===================================
>> > >
>> > > The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> > >
>> > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required configuration
>> > keys
>> > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
>> > dependency
>> > > management
>> > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
>> > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address pattern
>> > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in start-*-streaming.sh
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Thanks for reporting and providing a fix, Till! We have also fixed two
issues with the new job manager web frontend and pushed them to the
release-0.10 branch. Please review these changes in the new release
candidate.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> -1 from my side. I just found a serious issue with the KryoSerializer
> (FLINK-2800) which in some cases produced duplicated elements or corrupted
> data. I opened a PR to fix the issue (
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1308).
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the
> > normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather
> > wait for a proper fix.
> >
> > Now
> >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing
> > Afterwards
> >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome
> > this
> > > way.
> > > Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
> > >
> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
> > >> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
> > >> However, we don't have a better fix.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <
> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
> > >> >
> > >> > -- Sachin Goel
> > >> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> > m. +91-9871457685
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
> > >> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name.
> It's
> > >> just
> > >> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know
> if I
> > >> >> should.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox,
> > chrome
> > >> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild
> > flink-runtime-web
> > >> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >> m. +91-9871457685
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there,
> > yes.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job
> > view)
> > >> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> > >> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> > >> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are
> > displayed.
> > >> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that
> > these
> > >> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > >> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the
> > status
> > >> of
> > >> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however
> show
> > the
> > >> >>> > number
> > >> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> > >> >>> > consistency?
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying
> > the
> > >> >>> text
> > >> >>> > in
> > >> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being
> > used to
> > >> >>> > render
> > >> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered,
> > while
> > >> >>> for
> > >> >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it
> now.
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >>> > >> m. +91-9871457685
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> See
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> > >> >>> > >>> vs.
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <
> > mxm@apache.org>
> > >> >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a
> > long
> > >> >>> class
> > >> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your
> > job
> > >> >>> which
> > >> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting
> > wrapped
> > >> >>> > around
> > >> >>> > >>> to
> > >> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the
> > relevant
> > >> >>> place
> > >> >>> > in
> > >> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably
> > meant to
> > >> >>> > handle
> > >> >>> > >>> > this.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> >>> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring
> > to:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> .
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
> > >> >>> mxm@apache.org>
> > >> >>> > >>> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :)
> > The
> > >> >>> circles
> > >> >>> > >>> mark
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
> > >> squares
> > >> >>> > mark
> > >> >>> > >>> the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on
> > Firefox.
> > >> >>> Which
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make
> > any
> > >> >>> > >>> difference?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull
> them
> > in
> > >> for
> > >> >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> next
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web
> interface.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of
> > tasks in
> > >> >>> each
> > >> >>> > >>> status
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> show
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get
> > different
> > >> >>> values
> > >> >>> > >>> than
> > >> >>> > >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information
> > is
> > >> >>> hidden
> > >> >>> > >>> and I
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns
> for
> > >> each
> > >> >>> > >>> operator:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using
> > Firefox.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy
> > log
> > >> and
> > >> >>> > >>> stdout
> > >> >>> > >>> > tabs
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > for
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been
> finished
> > >> yet.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the
> > release
> > >> :)
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure
> > either.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web
> interface
> > :)
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
> > >> >>> supposed
> > >> >>> > to
> > >> >>> > >>> > show?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> No
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
> > >> (operator=1,
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian
> > Michels <
> > >> >>> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are
> > unaffected
> > >> by
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> > >>> > changes
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> of
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
> > >> >>> Kalavri <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or
> are
> > we
> > >> >>> using
> > >> >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
> > >> Michels
> > >> >>> <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
> > >> >>> candidate
> > >> >>> > as
> > >> >>> > >>> > Apache
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> > >> >>> )
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on
> > can be
> > >> >>> found
> > >> >>> > >>> at:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with
> > the
> > >> key
> > >> >>> > with
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this
> release
> > >> can be
> > >> >>> > found
> > >> >>> > >>> > at:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours
> > and
> > >> >>> passes
> > >> >>> > >>> if a
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30,
> > 2015.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache
> > Flink
> > >> >>> > 0.10.0
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package
> > because
> > >> ...
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added
> on
> > >> top
> > >> >>> of
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
> > >> default
> > >> >>> > >>> required
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
> > >> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded
> version
> > >> >>> > artifacts
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
> > >> >>> unexpected
> > >> >>> > >>> leader
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > address
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces
> > in
> > >> >>> Path in
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
-1 from my side. I just found a serious issue with the KryoSerializer
(FLINK-2800) which in some cases produced duplicated elements or corrupted
data. I opened a PR to fix the issue (
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1308).
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the
> normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather
> wait for a proper fix.
>
> Now
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing
> Afterwards
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome
> this
> > way.
> > Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
> >
> > -- Sachin Goel
> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > m. +91-9871457685
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
> >> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
> >> However, we don't have a better fix.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
> >> >
> >> > -- Sachin Goel
> >> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> > m. +91-9871457685
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <
> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
> >> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's
> >> just
> >> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
> >> >> should.
> >> >>
> >> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox,
> chrome
> >> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild
> flink-runtime-web
> >> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -- Sachin Goel
> >> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >> m. +91-9871457685
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there,
> yes.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job
> view)
> >> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> >> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> >> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are
> displayed.
> >> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that
> these
> >> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the
> status
> >> of
> >> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show
> the
> >> >>> > number
> >> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> >> >>> > consistency?
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >> >>> > > wrote:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying
> the
> >> >>> text
> >> >>> > in
> >> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being
> used to
> >> >>> > render
> >> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered,
> while
> >> >>> for
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
> >> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >>> > >> m. +91-9871457685
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> See
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> >> >>> > >>> vs.
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <
> mxm@apache.org>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a
> long
> >> >>> class
> >> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your
> job
> >> >>> which
> >> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >> >>> > >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting
> wrapped
> >> >>> > around
> >> >>> > >>> to
> >> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the
> relevant
> >> >>> place
> >> >>> > in
> >> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably
> meant to
> >> >>> > handle
> >> >>> > >>> > this.
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> >>> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> >> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring
> to:
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> >> >>> > >>> > >> .
> >> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
> >> >>> mxm@apache.org>
> >> >>> > >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :)
> The
> >> >>> circles
> >> >>> > >>> mark
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
> >> squares
> >> >>> > mark
> >> >>> > >>> the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on
> Firefox.
> >> >>> Which
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make
> any
> >> >>> > >>> difference?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them
> in
> >> for
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > >>> next
> >> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of
> tasks in
> >> >>> each
> >> >>> > >>> status
> >> >>> > >>> > >> show
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get
> different
> >> >>> values
> >> >>> > >>> than
> >> >>> > >>> > the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information
> is
> >> >>> hidden
> >> >>> > >>> and I
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for
> >> each
> >> >>> > >>> operator:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using
> Firefox.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy
> log
> >> and
> >> >>> > >>> stdout
> >> >>> > >>> > tabs
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > for
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished
> >> yet.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the
> release
> >> :)
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure
> either.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface
> :)
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
> >> >>> supposed
> >> >>> > to
> >> >>> > >>> > show?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> No
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
> >> (operator=1,
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian
> Michels <
> >> >>> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are
> unaffected
> >> by
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> > >>> > changes
> >> >>> > >>> > >> of
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
> >> >>> Kalavri <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are
> we
> >> >>> using
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
> >> Michels
> >> >>> <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
> >> >>> candidate
> >> >>> > as
> >> >>> > >>> > Apache
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> >> >>> )
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on
> can be
> >> >>> found
> >> >>> > >>> at:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with
> the
> >> key
> >> >>> > with
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release
> >> can be
> >> >>> > found
> >> >>> > >>> > at:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours
> and
> >> >>> passes
> >> >>> > >>> if a
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30,
> 2015.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache
> Flink
> >> >>> > 0.10.0
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package
> because
> >> ...
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on
> >> top
> >> >>> of
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
> >> default
> >> >>> > >>> required
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
> >> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
> >> >>> > artifacts
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
> >> >>> unexpected
> >> >>> > >>> leader
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > address
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces
> in
> >> >>> Path in
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the
normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather
wait for a proper fix.
Now
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing
Afterwards
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome this
> way.
> Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. +91-9871457685
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
>> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
>> However, we don't have a better fix.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
>> >
>> > -- Sachin Goel
>> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > m. +91-9871457685
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
>> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's
>> just
>> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
>> >> should.
>> >>
>> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
>> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
>> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -- Sachin Goel
>> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >> m. +91-9871457685
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
>> >>>
>> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
>> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
>> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
>> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
>> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
>> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status
>> of
>> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
>> >>> > number
>> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
>> >>> > consistency?
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the
>> >>> text
>> >>> > in
>> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
>> >>> > render
>> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while
>> >>> for
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
>> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >>> > >> m. +91-9871457685
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> See
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>> >>> > >>> vs.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
>> >>> class
>> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
>> >>> which
>> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> >>> > >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
>> >>> > around
>> >>> > >>> to
>> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant
>> >>> place
>> >>> > in
>> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
>> >>> > handle
>> >>> > >>> > this.
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> >>> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>> >>> > >>> > >> .
>> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
>> >>> mxm@apache.org>
>> >>> > >>> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
>> >>> circles
>> >>> > >>> mark
>> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
>> squares
>> >>> > mark
>> >>> > >>> the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>> >>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
>> >>> Which
>> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
>> >>> > >>> difference?
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in
>> for
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > >>> next
>> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> >>> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
>> >>> each
>> >>> > >>> status
>> >>> > >>> > >> show
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
>> >>> values
>> >>> > >>> than
>> >>> > >>> > the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
>> >>> hidden
>> >>> > >>> and I
>> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for
>> each
>> >>> > >>> operator:
>> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log
>> and
>> >>> > >>> stdout
>> >>> > >>> > tabs
>> >>> > >>> > >> > for
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished
>> yet.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> >>> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release
>> :)
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> >>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
>> >>> supposed
>> >>> > to
>> >>> > >>> > show?
>> >>> > >>> > >> No
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
>> (operator=1,
>> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
>> >>> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected
>> by
>> >>> the
>> >>> > >>> > changes
>> >>> > >>> > >> of
>> >>> > >>> > >> > the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
>> >>> Kalavri <
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
>> >>> using
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
>> Michels
>> >>> <
>> >>> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
>> >>> candidate
>> >>> > as
>> >>> > >>> > Apache
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
>> >>> )
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
>> >>> found
>> >>> > >>> at:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the
>> key
>> >>> > with
>> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release
>> can be
>> >>> > found
>> >>> > >>> > at:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
>> >>> passes
>> >>> > >>> if a
>> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
>> >>> > 0.10.0
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
>> ...
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on
>> top
>> >>> of
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
>> default
>> >>> > >>> required
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
>> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
>> >>> > artifacts
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
>> >>> unexpected
>> >>> > >>> leader
>> >>> > >>> > >> > address
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in
>> >>> Path in
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome this
way.
Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. +91-9871457685
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
> However, we don't have a better fix.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
> >
> > -- Sachin Goel
> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > m. +91-9871457685
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's
> just
> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
> >> should.
> >>
> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Sachin Goel
> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> m. +91-9871457685
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
> >>>
> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status
> of
> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
> >>> > number
> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> >>> > consistency?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the
> >>> text
> >>> > in
> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
> >>> > render
> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while
> >>> for
> >>> > the
> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >>> > >> m. +91-9871457685
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> See
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> >>> > >>> vs.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
> >>> class
> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
> >>> which
> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
> >>> > around
> >>> > >>> to
> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant
> >>> place
> >>> > in
> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
> >>> > handle
> >>> > >>> > this.
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >>> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> >>> > >>> > >> .
> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
> >>> mxm@apache.org>
> >>> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
> >>> circles
> >>> > >>> mark
> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
> squares
> >>> > mark
> >>> > >>> the
> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> >>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
> >>> Which
> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
> >>> > >>> difference?
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in
> for
> >>> > the
> >>> > >>> next
> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >>> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
> >>> each
> >>> > >>> status
> >>> > >>> > >> show
> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
> >>> values
> >>> > >>> than
> >>> > >>> > the
> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
> >>> hidden
> >>> > >>> and I
> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for
> each
> >>> > >>> operator:
> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> >>> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log
> and
> >>> > >>> stdout
> >>> > >>> > tabs
> >>> > >>> > >> > for
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished
> yet.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >>> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release
> :)
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> >>> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
> >>> supposed
> >>> > to
> >>> > >>> > show?
> >>> > >>> > >> No
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
> (operator=1,
> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
> >>> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected
> by
> >>> the
> >>> > >>> > changes
> >>> > >>> > >> of
> >>> > >>> > >> > the
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
> >>> Kalavri <
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
> >>> using
> >>> > the
> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
> Michels
> >>> <
> >>> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
> >>> candidate
> >>> > as
> >>> > >>> > Apache
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> >>> )
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
> >>> found
> >>> > >>> at:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the
> key
> >>> > with
> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release
> can be
> >>> > found
> >>> > >>> > at:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
> >>> passes
> >>> > >>> if a
> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
> >>> > 0.10.0
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
> ...
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on
> top
> >>> of
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
> default
> >>> > >>> required
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
> >>> > artifacts
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
> >>> unexpected
> >>> > >>> leader
> >>> > >>> > >> > address
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in
> >>> Path in
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
@Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
However, we don't have a better fix.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. +91-9871457685
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
>> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's just
>> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
>> should.
>>
>> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
>> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
>> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Sachin Goel
>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> m. +91-9871457685
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
>>>
>>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
>>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
>>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
>>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
>>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
>>> > are operator-level numbers?
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of
>>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
>>> > number
>>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
>>> > consistency?
>>> > >
>>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the
>>> text
>>> > in
>>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
>>> > render
>>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while
>>> for
>>> > the
>>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
>>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>>> > >> m. +91-9871457685
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> See
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>>> > >>> vs.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> -Vasia.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
>>> class
>>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
>>> which
>>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
>>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>>> > >>> > wrote:
>>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
>>> > around
>>> > >>> to
>>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant
>>> place
>>> > in
>>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
>>> > handle
>>> > >>> > this.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>>> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>>> > >>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>>> > >>> > >> .
>>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
>>> mxm@apache.org>
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
>>> circles
>>> > >>> mark
>>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares
>>> > mark
>>> > >>> the
>>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
>>> Which
>>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
>>> > >>> difference?
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for
>>> > the
>>> > >>> next
>>> > >>> > >> RC.
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>>> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
>>> each
>>> > >>> status
>>> > >>> > >> show
>>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
>>> values
>>> > >>> than
>>> > >>> > the
>>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
>>> hidden
>>> > >>> and I
>>> > >>> > >> > cannot
>>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
>>> > >>> operator:
>>> > >>> > >> bytes
>>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>>> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and
>>> > >>> stdout
>>> > >>> > tabs
>>> > >>> > >> > for
>>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>>> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>>> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
>>> supposed
>>> > to
>>> > >>> > show?
>>> > >>> > >> No
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
>>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
>>> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by
>>> the
>>> > >>> > changes
>>> > >>> > >> of
>>> > >>> > >> > the
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
>>> Kalavri <
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
>>> using
>>> > the
>>> > >>> > >> > previous
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels
>>> <
>>> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
>>> candidate
>>> > as
>>> > >>> > Apache
>>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
>>> )
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
>>> found
>>> > >>> at:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key
>>> > with
>>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be
>>> > found
>>> > >>> > at:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
>>> passes
>>> > >>> if a
>>> > >>> > >> > majority
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
>>> > 0.10.0
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top
>>> of
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
>>> > >>> required
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
>>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
>>> > artifacts
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
>>> unexpected
>>> > >>> leader
>>> > >>> > >> > address
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in
>>> Path in
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. +91-9871457685
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's just
> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
> should.
>
> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
>
>
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. +91-9871457685
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
>>
>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
>> > are operator-level numbers?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of
>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
>> > number
>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
>> > consistency?
>> > >
>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the
>> text
>> > in
>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>> > >>
>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
>> > render
>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while
>> for
>> > the
>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
>> > >>
>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > >> m. +91-9871457685
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> See
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>> > >>> vs.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>> > >>>
>> > >>> -Vasia.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
>> class
>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
>> which
>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > wrote:
>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
>> > around
>> > >>> to
>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant
>> place
>> > in
>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
>> > handle
>> > >>> > this.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> > >>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>> > >>> > >> .
>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
>> mxm@apache.org>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
>> circles
>> > >>> mark
>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares
>> > mark
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
>> Which
>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
>> > >>> difference?
>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for
>> > the
>> > >>> next
>> > >>> > >> RC.
>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
>> each
>> > >>> status
>> > >>> > >> show
>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
>> values
>> > >>> than
>> > >>> > the
>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
>> hidden
>> > >>> and I
>> > >>> > >> > cannot
>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
>> > >>> operator:
>> > >>> > >> bytes
>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and
>> > >>> stdout
>> > >>> > tabs
>> > >>> > >> > for
>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
>> supposed
>> > to
>> > >>> > show?
>> > >>> > >> No
>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
>> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by
>> the
>> > >>> > changes
>> > >>> > >> of
>> > >>> > >> > the
>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
>> Kalavri <
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
>> using
>> > the
>> > >>> > >> > previous
>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels
>> <
>> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
>> candidate
>> > as
>> > >>> > Apache
>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
>> )
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
>> found
>> > >>> at:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key
>> > with
>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be
>> > found
>> > >>> > at:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
>> passes
>> > >>> if a
>> > >>> > >> > majority
>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
>> > 0.10.0
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top
>> of
>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
>> > >>> required
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
>> > artifacts
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
>> unexpected
>> > >>> leader
>> > >>> > >> > address
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in
>> Path in
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
@Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's just
two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
should.
@Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
followed by flink-dist first. :)]
-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. +91-9871457685
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
> > are operator-level numbers?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of
> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
> > number
> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> > consistency?
> > >
> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0101@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the text
> > in
> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> > >>
> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
> > render
> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while for
> > the
> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
> > >>
> > >> -- Sachin Goel
> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> m. +91-9871457685
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> > >>>
> > >>> See
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> > >>> vs.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> > >>>
> > >>> -Vasia.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
> class
> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
> which
> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
> > around
> > >>> to
> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place
> > in
> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
> > handle
> > >>> > this.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> > >>> > >> .
> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
> circles
> > >>> mark
> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares
> > mark
> > >>> the
> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
> Which
> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
> > >>> difference?
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for
> > the
> > >>> next
> > >>> > >> RC.
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
> each
> > >>> status
> > >>> > >> show
> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
> values
> > >>> than
> > >>> > the
> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
> hidden
> > >>> and I
> > >>> > >> > cannot
> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
> > >>> operator:
> > >>> > >> bytes
> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and
> > >>> stdout
> > >>> > tabs
> > >>> > >> > for
> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed
> > to
> > >>> > show?
> > >>> > >> No
> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by
> the
> > >>> > changes
> > >>> > >> of
> > >>> > >> > the
> > >>> > >> > >> > new
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> <
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
> using
> > the
> > >>> > >> > previous
> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
> candidate
> > as
> > >>> > Apache
> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
> found
> > >>> at:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key
> > with
> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be
> > found
> > >>> > at:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
> passes
> > >>> if a
> > >>> > >> > majority
> > >>> > >> > >> > of
> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
> > 0.10.0
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
> > >>> required
> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
> > artifacts
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
> unexpected
> > >>> leader
> > >>> > >> > address
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path
> in
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
> while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
> Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
> are operator-level numbers?
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of
> > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
> number
> > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> consistency?
> >
> > -- Sachin Goel
> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > m. +91-9871457685
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the text
> in
> >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> >>
> >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
> render
> >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while for
> the
> >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
> >>
> >> -- Sachin Goel
> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> m. +91-9871457685
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> >>>
> >>> See
> >>>
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> >>> vs.
> >>>
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> >>>
> >>> -Vasia.
> >>>
> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class
> >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which
> >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> >>> >
> >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
> around
> >>> to
> >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place
> in
> >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
> handle
> >>> > this.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> >>> > >> .
> >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles
> >>> mark
> >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares
> mark
> >>> the
> >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
> >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
> >>> difference?
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for
> the
> >>> next
> >>> > >> RC.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each
> >>> status
> >>> > >> show
> >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values
> >>> than
> >>> > the
> >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden
> >>> and I
> >>> > >> > cannot
> >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
> >>> operator:
> >>> > >> bytes
> >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > >> > wrote:
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and
> >>> stdout
> >>> > tabs
> >>> > >> > for
> >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
> >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
> >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed
> to
> >>> > show?
> >>> > >> No
> >>> > >> > >> > matter
> >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
> >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
> >>> > mxm@apache.org
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the
> >>> > changes
> >>> > >> of
> >>> > >> > the
> >>> > >> > >> > new
> >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using
> the
> >>> > >> > previous
> >>> > >> > >> > one?
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
> >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
> >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate
> as
> >>> > Apache
> >>> > >> > >> Flink
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found
> >>> at:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key
> with
> >>> > >> > fingerprint
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be
> found
> >>> > at:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes
> >>> if a
> >>> > >> > majority
> >>> > >> > >> > of
> >>> > >> > >> > > at
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
> 0.10.0
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
> >>> required
> >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
> artifacts
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected
> >>> leader
> >>> > >> > address
> >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
are operator-level numbers?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of
> vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the number
> of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for consistency?
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. +91-9871457685
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the text in
>> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>>
>> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to render
>> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while for the
>> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
>>
>> -- Sachin Goel
>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> m. +91-9871457685
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>>>
>>> See
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>>> vs.
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> -Vasia.
>>>
>>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class
>>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which
>>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>>> >
>>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped around
>>> to
>>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place in
>>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to handle
>>> > this.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>>> > >> .
>>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > @Vasia:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles
>>> mark
>>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark
>>> the
>>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
>>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
>>> difference?
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the
>>> next
>>> > >> RC.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each
>>> status
>>> > >> show
>>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values
>>> than
>>> > the
>>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden
>>> and I
>>> > >> > cannot
>>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
>>> operator:
>>> > >> bytes
>>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and
>>> stdout
>>> > tabs
>>> > >> > for
>>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
>>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to
>>> > show?
>>> > >> No
>>> > >> > >> > matter
>>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
>>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
>>> > mxm@apache.org
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the
>>> > changes
>>> > >> of
>>> > >> > the
>>> > >> > >> > new
>>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the
>>> > >> > previous
>>> > >> > >> > one?
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
>>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
>>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
>>> > Apache
>>> > >> > >> Flink
>>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found
>>> at:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with
>>> > >> > fingerprint
>>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found
>>> > at:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes
>>> if a
>>> > >> > majority
>>> > >> > >> > of
>>> > >> > >> > > at
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
>>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
>>> required
>>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>>> > >> > httpclient) to
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected
>>> leader
>>> > >> > address
>>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
>>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of
vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the number
of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for consistency?
-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. +91-9871457685
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the text in
> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>
> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to render
> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while for the
> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. +91-9871457685
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>>
>> See
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>> vs.
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>>
>> -Vasia.
>>
>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class
>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which
>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>> >
>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped around
>> to
>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place in
>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to handle
>> > this.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>> > >> .
>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>> > >>
>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > @Vasia:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles
>> mark
>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark
>> the
>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>> > >> >
>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
>> difference?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the
>> next
>> > >> RC.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each
>> status
>> > >> show
>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values
>> than
>> > the
>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden
>> and I
>> > >> > cannot
>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
>> operator:
>> > >> bytes
>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and
>> stdout
>> > tabs
>> > >> > for
>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to
>> > show?
>> > >> No
>> > >> > >> > matter
>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
>> > mxm@apache.org
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the
>> > changes
>> > >> of
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > >> > new
>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the
>> > >> > previous
>> > >> > >> > one?
>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
>> > Apache
>> > >> > >> Flink
>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found
>> at:
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with
>> > >> > fingerprint
>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found
>> > at:
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >>
>> > >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes
>> if a
>> > >> > majority
>> > >> > >> > of
>> > >> > >> > > at
>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
>> required
>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>> > >> > httpclient) to
>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected
>> leader
>> > >> > address
>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
@Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the text in
this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
@Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to render
those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while for the
job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. +91-9871457685
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> wrote:
> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>
> See
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> vs.
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>
> -Vasia.
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class
> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which
> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> >
> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped around to
> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place in
> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to handle
> > this.
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> > >> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> > >> .
> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> > >>
> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > @Vasia:
> > >> >
> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles
> mark
> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark
> the
> > >> > status of a task within a job
> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> > >> >
> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any difference?
> > >> >
> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the
> next
> > >> RC.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each
> status
> > >> show
> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values
> than
> > the
> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden and
> I
> > >> > cannot
> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
> operator:
> > >> bytes
> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Vasia.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout
> > tabs
> > >> > for
> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to
> > show?
> > >> No
> > >> > >> > matter
> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
> > >> > parallelism=2,
> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
> > mxm@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the
> > changes
> > >> of
> > >> > the
> > >> > >> > new
> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the
> > >> > previous
> > >> > >> > one?
> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
> > Apache
> > >> > >> Flink
> > >> > >> > > > > version
> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with
> > >> > fingerprint
> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found
> > at:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if
> a
> > >> > majority
> > >> > >> > of
> > >> > >> > > at
> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
> required
> > >> > >> > > configuration
> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> > >> > httpclient) to
> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected
> leader
> > >> > address
> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
The numbers I see in the overview are different.
See
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
vs.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
-Vasia.
On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class
> name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which
> you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>
> @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped around to
> > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place in
> > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to handle
> this.
> >
> >
> > -- Sachin Goel
> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > m. +91-9871457685
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
> >>
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> >> .
> >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> >>
> >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > @Vasia:
> >> >
> >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles mark
> >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark the
> >> > status of a task within a job
> >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> >> >
> >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
> >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any difference?
> >> >
> >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the next
> >> RC.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> >> > >
> >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each status
> >> show
> >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values than
> the
> >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden and I
> >> > cannot
> >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each operator:
> >> bytes
> >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> >> > >
> >> > > -Vasia.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout
> tabs
> >> > for
> >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
> >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to
> show?
> >> No
> >> > >> > matter
> >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
> >> > parallelism=2,
> >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
> mxm@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the
> changes
> >> of
> >> > the
> >> > >> > new
> >> > >> > > > RC.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the
> >> > previous
> >> > >> > one?
> >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
> >> > mxm@apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache
> >> > >> Flink
> >> > >> > > > > version
> >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> >> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with
> >> > fingerprint
> >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found
> at:
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> >> > majority
> >> > >> > of
> >> > >> > > at
> >> > >> > > > > > least
> >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
> >> > >> > > configuration
> >> > >> > > > > > keys
> >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> >> > httpclient) to
> >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> >> > >> > > > > > > management
> >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader
> >> > address
> >> > >> > > > pattern
> >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
@Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long class
name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job which
you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
@Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped around to
> accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place in
> app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to handle this.
>
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. +91-9871457685
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>> .
>> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>>
>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > @Vasia:
>> >
>> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles mark
>> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark the
>> > status of a task within a job
>> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>> >
>> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
>> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any difference?
>> >
>> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the next
>> RC.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>> > >
>> > > When inside a running job's view:
>> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each status
>> show
>> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values than the
>> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden and I
>> > cannot
>> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each operator:
>> bytes
>> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>> > >
>> > > -Vasia.
>> > >
>> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout tabs
>> > for
>> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
>> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show?
>> No
>> > >> > matter
>> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
>> > parallelism=2,
>> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Thanks!
>> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org
>> >
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes
>> of
>> > the
>> > >> > new
>> > >> > > > RC.
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the
>> > previous
>> > >> > one?
>> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
>> > mxm@apache.org>
>> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> > >> Flink
>> > >> > > > > version
>> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with
>> > fingerprint
>> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
>> > majority
>> > >> > of
>> > >> > > at
>> > >> > > > > > least
>> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
>> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
>> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
>> > >> > > configuration
>> > >> > > > > > keys
>> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>> > httpclient) to
>> > >> > > > > > dependency
>> > >> > > > > > > management
>> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
>> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader
>> > address
>> > >> > > > pattern
>> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
>> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped around to
accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant place in
app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to handle this.
-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. +91-9871457685
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> wrote:
> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> .
> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > @Vasia:
> >
> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles mark
> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark the
> > status of a task within a job
> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> >
> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any difference?
> >
> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the next
> RC.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> > >
> > > When inside a running job's view:
> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each status
> show
> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values than the
> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden and I
> > cannot
> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each operator:
> bytes
> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> > >
> > > -Vasia.
> > >
> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout tabs
> > for
> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
> > >> >
> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show?
> No
> > >> > matter
> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
> > parallelism=2,
> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes
> of
> > the
> > >> > new
> > >> > > > RC.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the
> > previous
> > >> > one?
> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
> > mxm@apache.org>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> > >> Flink
> > >> > > > > version
> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > >> > > > > > >
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with
> > fingerprint
> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> > majority
> > >> > of
> > >> > > at
> > >> > > > > > least
> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
> > >> > > configuration
> > >> > > > > > keys
> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> > httpclient) to
> > >> > > > > > dependency
> > >> > > > > > > management
> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader
> > address
> > >> > > > pattern
> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing.
Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Vasia:
>
> - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles mark
> the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark the
> status of a task within a job
> (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>
> - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
> version are you using? Does resizing the window make any difference?
>
> @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the next RC.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> >
> > When inside a running job's view:
> > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each status show
> > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values than the
> > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden and I
> cannot
> > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each operator: bytes
> > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> >
> > -Vasia.
> >
> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout tabs
> for
> >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
> >> I'll file a jira for both.
> >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <va...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
> >> >
> >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No
> >> > matter
> >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
> parallelism=2,
> >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks!
> >> > > > -Vasia.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of
> the
> >> > new
> >> > > > RC.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the
> previous
> >> > one?
> >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <
> mxm@apache.org>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> >> Flink
> >> > > > > version
> >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Branch:
> >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> >> > > > > > >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with
> fingerprint
> >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> majority
> >> > of
> >> > > at
> >> > > > > > least
> >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > ===================================
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
> >> > > configuration
> >> > > > > > keys
> >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> httpclient) to
> >> > > > > > dependency
> >> > > > > > > management
> >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader
> address
> >> > > > pattern
> >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
@Vasia:
- There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The circles mark
the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares mark the
status of a task within a job
(cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
- I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox. Which
version are you using? Does resizing the window make any difference?
@Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for the next RC.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
<va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>
> When inside a running job's view:
> - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each status show
> wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values than the
> ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden and I cannot
> scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each operator: bytes
> read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>
> -Vasia.
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout tabs for
>> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
>> I'll file a jira for both.
>> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <va...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>> >
>> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Those are hard coded values.
>> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No
>> > matter
>> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, parallelism=2,
>> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > > > -Vasia.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Here is the new document:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the
>> > new
>> > > > RC.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous
>> > one?
>> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> Flink
>> > > > > version
>> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Branch:
>> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> > > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
>> > > > > C2909CBF:
>> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority
>> > of
>> > > at
>> > > > > > least
>> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
>> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ===================================
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
>> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
>> > > configuration
>> > > > > > keys
>> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
>> > > > > > dependency
>> > > > > > > management
>> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
>> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address
>> > > > pattern
>> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
>> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
When inside a running job's view:
- I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in each status show
wrong values (or show something else?). I get different values than the
ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
- In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is hidden and I cannot
scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each operator: bytes
read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
-Vasia.
On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout tabs for
> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
> I'll file a jira for both.
> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <va...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
> >
> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Those are hard coded values.
> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No
> > matter
> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, parallelism=2,
> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > -Vasia.
> > > >
> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the new document:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > > > >
> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the
> > new
> > > > RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous
> > one?
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Flink
> > > > > version
> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Branch:
> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > > > > C2909CBF:
> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority
> > of
> > > at
> > > > > > least
> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ===================================
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
> > > configuration
> > > > > > keys
> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
> > > > > > dependency
> > > > > > > management
> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address
> > > > pattern
> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and stdout tabs for
task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
I'll file a jira for both.
On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <va...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Those are hard coded values.
> > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <va...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No
> matter
> > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, parallelism=2,
> > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > -Vasia.
> > >
> > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > > >
> > > > Here is the new document:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > > >
> > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the
> new
> > > RC.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous
> one?
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> > > > version
> > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Branch:
> > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > > > C2909CBF:
> > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority
> of
> > at
> > > > > least
> > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ===================================
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following commits have been added on top of
> release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
> > configuration
> > > > > keys
> > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
> > > > > dependency
> > > > > > management
> > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address
> > > pattern
> > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> > > start-*-streaming.sh
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Those are hard coded values.
> What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <va...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No matter
> > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, parallelism=2,
> > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Vasia.
> >
> > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > >
> > > Here is the new document:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > >
> > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the new
> > RC.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous one?
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> > > version
> > > > > 0.10.0:
> > > > >
> > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > > > >
> > > > > Branch:
> > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > > > >
> > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > > > >
> > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > > C2909CBF:
> > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > > > >
> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
> at
> > > > least
> > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > >
> > > > > ===================================
> > > > >
> > > > > The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > > > >
> > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required
> configuration
> > > > keys
> > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
> > > > dependency
> > > > > management
> > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address
> > pattern
> > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> > start-*-streaming.sh
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>.
Those are hard coded values.
What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <va...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No matter
> what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, parallelism=2,
> subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>
> Thanks!
> -Vasia.
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >
> > Here is the new document:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >
> > I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the new
> RC.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous one?
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> > version
> > > > 0.10.0:
> > > >
> > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > > >
> > > > Branch:
> > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > > >
> > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > > >
> > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > C2909CBF:
> > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > > least
> > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > >
> > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >
> > > > ===================================
> > > >
> > > > The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > > >
> > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required configuration
> > > keys
> > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
> > > dependency
> > > > management
> > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address
> pattern
> > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in
> start-*-streaming.sh
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
I have a question regarding the web interface :)
What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab supposed to show? No matter
what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1, parallelism=2,
subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
Thanks!
-Vasia.
On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>
> Here is the new document:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>
> I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the new RC.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous one?
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> version
> > > 0.10.0:
> > >
> > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > >
> > > Branch:
> > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > >
> > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > >
> > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> C2909CBF:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >
> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least
> > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >
> > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > > ===================================
> > >
> > > The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > >
> > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required configuration
> > keys
> > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
> > dependency
> > > management
> > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address pattern
> > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in start-*-streaming.sh
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
Here is the new document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
I've transferred results which are unaffected by the changes of the new RC.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous one?
> Thanks!
>
> On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> > 0.10.0:
> >
> > The commit to be voted on:
> > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >
> > Branch:
> > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> >
> > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint C2909CBF:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >
> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > ===================================
> >
> > The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >
> > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required configuration
> keys
> > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to
> dependency
> > management
> > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address pattern
> > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in start-*-streaming.sh
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we using the previous one? Thanks!
On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> 0.10.0:
>
> The commit to be voted on:
> ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>
> Branch:
> release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
>
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint C2909CBF:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> ===================================
>
> The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc1:
>
> ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default required configuration keys
> in flink-conf of binary distribution
> 874c500 Add org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore, httpclient) to dependency
> management
> 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version artifacts
> b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix unexpected leader address pattern
> 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in Path in start-*-streaming.sh
>