You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2000/11/09 22:17:56 UTC
ap_rputs (once again)
Someone,
from the current tree, please tell me if rputs is broken again,
or if I'm just imagining things.
Bill
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
> From: jlwpc1 [mailto:jlwpc1@mail.earthlink.net]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 4:13 PM
>
> From: "Bill Stoddard"
>
> > The reason you are not seeing any files is that apr_readdir is failing (on
> > windows) with error code 22003 (what ever that means. I cannot find it in
> > MSDN). The call failing inside apr_readdir is FindFirstFileW().
>
> 22003 [Microsoft] [ODBC SQL Server Driver] [SQL Server]Arithmetic overflow
> error converting numeric to type real
More meaningless than that... error 2003 (remember all OS errors are
canonicalized by an offset of 20000): ERROR_METAFILE_NOT_SUPPORTED.
Doesn't matter, was an allocation fault that is now fixed.
Re: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, jlwpc1 wrote:
>
> From: "Bill Stoddard"
>
>
> > The reason you are not seeing any files is that apr_readdir is failing (on
> > windows) with error code 22003 (what ever that means. I cannot find it in
> > MSDN). The call failing inside apr_readdir is FindFirstFileW().
> >
>
> 22003 [Microsoft] [ODBC SQL Server Driver] [SQL Server]Arithmetic overflow
> error converting numeric to type real
That is an APR error value, which is 2003 (the windows error) + 20000 (the
APR offset)
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by jlwpc1 <jl...@mail.earthlink.net>.
From: "Bill Stoddard"
> The reason you are not seeing any files is that apr_readdir is failing (on
> windows) with error code 22003 (what ever that means. I cannot find it in
> MSDN). The call failing inside apr_readdir is FindFirstFileW().
>
22003 [Microsoft] [ODBC SQL Server Driver] [SQL Server]Arithmetic overflow
error converting numeric to type real
????
JLW
Re: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 08:34:08PM -0800, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > 1. are filter names truly case sensitive? (Contradicts the general
> > style of httpd.conf, if they are.)
>
> Yes. That is easy to change though. I'll make that change tonight.
No, they are not case-sensitive. ap_add_*_filter() uses strcasecmp()
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 1. are filter names truly case sensitive? (Contradicts the general
> style of httpd.conf, if they are.)
Yes. That is easy to change though. I'll make that change tonight.
> 2. yup - broken :-( At least I breakpointed into the parsing code,
> and we really do get there, so my conf was correct (this time around.)
Hmmm... The last time I tested it, it was working. At this point we may
as well wait for Paul's re-write.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
1. are filter names truly case sensitive? (Contradicts the general
style of httpd.conf, if they are.)
2. yup - broken :-( At least I breakpointed into the parsing code,
and we really do get there, so my conf was correct (this time around.)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 10:11 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: RE: ap_rputs (once again)
>
>
>
> > > You do have AddFilter INCLUDES in your config, correct?
> >
> > Nope, just followed the docs in htdocs/manual/mod/mod_include.html
> >
> > right :-?
> >
> > Thanks for the hint.
>
> 2.0 doesn't use the same docs for assigning filters. I am
> going to work
> on this later this week.
>
> Ryan
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________________
> Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
>
>
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
> > You do have AddFilter INCLUDES in your config, correct?
>
> Nope, just followed the docs in htdocs/manual/mod/mod_include.html
>
> right :-?
>
> Thanks for the hint.
2.0 doesn't use the same docs for assigning filters. I am going to work
on this later this week.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 8:57 PM
>
> > OTOH, mod_include does seem broken ... with simply the Options Include
> > and testing our cvs htdocs, I'm getting no results for includes... is
> > that the expected behavior today?
>
> You do have AddFilter INCLUDES in your config, correct?
Nope, just followed the docs in htdocs/manual/mod/mod_include.html
right :-?
Thanks for the hint.
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
> OTOH, mod_include does seem broken ... with simply the Options Include
> and testing our cvs htdocs, I'm getting no results for includes... is
> that the expected behavior today?
You do have AddFilter INCLUDES in your config, correct?
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Thanks Ryan and FirstBill,
The patch at 3pm did fix this, at least on NT 4.0 - and odds on that
this ap_r* problem on the W2k box seems no problem at all (!?!).
Perhaps I had a hidden child deamon that was never killed properly,
just trying to baffle me.
OTOH, mod_include does seem broken ... with simply the Options Include
and testing our cvs htdocs, I'm getting no results for includes... is
that the expected behavior today?
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:58 PM
>
> > From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:bill@wstoddard.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:50 PM
> >
> > >
> > > look at the mod_autoindex output - I'm not getting any files
> > > whatsoever (head and foot - that's it). Could be my filename
> > > patches - but I've walked the code and it is trying to spit
> > > stuff to ap_rputxx.
> >
> > The reason you are not seeing any files is that apr_readdir
> > is failing (on
> > windows) with error code 22003 (what ever that means. I
> > cannot find it in
> > MSDN). The call failing inside apr_readdir is FindFirstFileW().
>
> My last patch to dir.c at 3:05pm cst should have fixed that. It
> was a nonsense error (acutally os error 2003).
>
> > I debugged it this far and am out of time for the week.
>
> I'll lick it, I hope :-/
>
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:bill@wstoddard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:50 PM
>
> >
> > look at the mod_autoindex output - I'm not getting any files
> > whatsoever (head and foot - that's it). Could be my filename
> > patches - but I've walked the code and it is trying to spit
> > stuff to ap_rputxx.
>
> The reason you are not seeing any files is that apr_readdir
> is failing (on
> windows) with error code 22003 (what ever that means. I
> cannot find it in
> MSDN). The call failing inside apr_readdir is FindFirstFileW().
My last patch to dir.c at 3:05pm cst should have fixed that. It
was a nonsense error (acutally os error 2003).
> I debugged it this far and am out of time for the week.
I'll lick it, I hope :-/
Re: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
>
> look at the mod_autoindex output - I'm not getting any files
> whatsoever (head and foot - that's it). Could be my filename
> patches - but I've walked the code and it is trying to spit
> stuff to ap_rputxx.
The reason you are not seeing any files is that apr_readdir is failing (on
windows) with error code 22003 (what ever that means. I cannot find it in
MSDN). The call failing inside apr_readdir is FindFirstFileW().
I debugged it this far and am out of time for the week.
Bill
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
I'd be rather surprized... but I'll take a close look
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:49 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: RE: ap_rputs (once again)
>
>
>
> I'm getting valid output from mod_autoindex right now. Is something
> happening with the buckets on Windows perhaps?
>
> Ryan
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > > From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:25 PM
> > >
> > > What are you seeing?
> >
> > look at the mod_autoindex output - I'm not getting any files
> > whatsoever (head and foot - that's it). Could be my filename
> > patches - but I've walked the code and it is trying to spit
> > stuff to ap_rputxx.
> >
> > I'm starting the conversion to buckets. In the interim,
> > please let me know if I'm seeing things. Look for the new
> > autoindex late tonight or tommorow am.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________________
> Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
>
>
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
I'm getting valid output from mod_autoindex right now. Is something
happening with the buckets on Windows perhaps?
Ryan
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:25 PM
> >
> > What are you seeing?
>
> look at the mod_autoindex output - I'm not getting any files
> whatsoever (head and foot - that's it). Could be my filename
> patches - but I've walked the code and it is trying to spit
> stuff to ap_rputxx.
>
> I'm starting the conversion to buckets. In the interim,
> please let me know if I'm seeing things. Look for the new
> autoindex late tonight or tommorow am.
>
> Bill
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RE: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:25 PM
>
> What are you seeing?
look at the mod_autoindex output - I'm not getting any files
whatsoever (head and foot - that's it). Could be my filename
patches - but I've walked the code and it is trying to spit
stuff to ap_rputxx.
I'm starting the conversion to buckets. In the interim,
please let me know if I'm seeing things. Look for the new
autoindex late tonight or tommorow am.
Bill
Re: ap_rputs (once again)
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
What are you seeing?
Ryan
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Someone,
>
> from the current tree, please tell me if rputs is broken again,
> or if I'm just imagining things.
>
> Bill
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------