You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "Mickael Maison (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/04/14 14:02:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-10892) Add Topology#connectSourceStoreAndTopic as a public method
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mickael Maison updated KAFKA-10892:
-----------------------------------
Labels: kip (was: )
> Add Topology#connectSourceStoreAndTopic as a public method
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-10892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10892
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: streams
> Reporter: Tomohiro Hashidate
> Assignee: Daan Gerits
> Priority: Major
> Labels: kip
>
> I want Topology#connectSourceStoreAndTopic.
> Because I want to use a topic as a source topic directly without a redundant changelog topic for not only KeyValueStore but also WindowStore.
> This issue is similar to [KAFKA-6840], but is a suggestion for a more general approach
> {code:java}
> public synchronized Topology connectSourceStoreAndTopic(final String sourceStoreName,
> final String topic) {
> internalTopologyBuilder.connectSourceStoreAndTopic(sourceStoreName, topic);
> return this;
> }
> {code}
> h3. Background
> I want to use a topic as a source topic for WindowStore because using WindowStore is suitable for the feature that I'm implementing.
> The records stored in the topic are aggregated with a time window by another application. The size of the topic is over 10TB.
> I want to use the topic as a source topic for WindowStore directly.
> But, I cannot do so on the current interface.
> I need a redundant topic only for storing the records into WindowStore.
> If this API is public, I can use topics incoming from other applications (not only Kafka Streams applications) as source topics for any StateStore implementation without redundant changelog topics.
> Of course, I need to implement a processor for storing incoming records in such a case.
> But I think it's not difficult.
> Please consider this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)