You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/08/15 07:01:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-22810) Initialize an separate ThreadPoolExecutor for taking/restoring snapshot

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16907867#comment-16907867 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22810:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.3-IT #618 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3-IT/618/])
HBASE-22810 Initialize an separate ThreadPoolExecutor for (openinx: rev b97621b30216dc39ad605e06738a070a69a47da3)
* (edit) hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/executor/ExecutorType.java
* (edit) hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/executor/EventType.java
* (edit) hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/executor/TestExecutorService.java
* (edit) hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java
* (edit) hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/HMaster.java


> Initialize an separate ThreadPoolExecutor for taking/restoring snapshot 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-22810
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22810
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Zheng Hu
>            Assignee: Zheng Hu
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 1.5.0, 2.3.0, 2.0.6, 2.2.1, 2.1.6, 1.3.6, 1.4.11
>
>
> In EventType class, we have the following definition, means  taking snapshot & restoring snapshot are use the MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS  Executor now. 
> {code}
>   /**
>    * Messages originating from Client to Master.<br>
>    * C_M_SNAPSHOT_TABLE<br>
>    * Client asking Master to snapshot an offline table.
>    */
>   C_M_SNAPSHOT_TABLE        (48, ExecutorType.MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS),
>   /**
>    * Messages originating from Client to Master.<br>
>    * C_M_RESTORE_SNAPSHOT<br>
>    * Client asking Master to restore a snapshot.
>    */
>   C_M_RESTORE_SNAPSHOT      (49, ExecutorType.MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS),
> {code}
> But when I checked the MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS thread pool initialization, I see : 
> {code}
>   private void startServiceThreads() throws IOException{
>    // ...  some other code initializing .... 
>    // We depend on there being only one instance of this executor running
>    // at a time.  To do concurrency, would need fencing of enable/disable of
>    // tables.
>    // Any time changing this maxThreads to > 1, pls see the comment at
>    // AccessController#postCompletedCreateTableAction
>    this.executorService.startExecutorService(ExecutorType.MASTER_TABLE_OPERATIONS, 1);
>    startProcedureExecutor();
> {code}
> That's to say,  for CPs  enable or disable table sequencely,  we will create a ThreadPoolExecutor with threadPoolSize=1.   Then we actually cann't accomplish the snapshoting  concurrence even if they are total difference tables, says if there are two table snapshoting request, and the Table A cost  5min for snapshoting, then the Table B need to wait 5min and once Table A finish its snapshot , then Table B will start the snapshot.
> While we've setting the snapshot timeout, so it will be easy to timeout for table B snapshoting .   Actually,  we can create a separate thead pool for snapshot operations only.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)