You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/08/03 22:55:04 UTC

[jira] [Created] (TS-3816) Should we replace ptr_len_cmp() with memcmp() consistently?

Leif Hedstrom created TS-3816:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Should we replace ptr_len_cmp() with memcmp() consistently?
                 Key: TS-3816
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3816
             Project: Traffic Server
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Core
            Reporter: Leif Hedstrom


In most places, we already use memcmp(), but we have our own implementation / wrapper named ptr_len_cmp(), which is used in a few places. This seems rather inconsistent, so either we use ptr_len_cmp() consistently, or just use memcmp() across the board.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)