You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by David Spencer <da...@tropo.com> on 2005/02/01 20:40:08 UTC
competition - Re: rackmount lucene/nutch - Re: google mini? who needs
it when Lucene is there
I wasn't sure where in this thread to reply so I'm replying to myself :)
What search appliances exist now?
I only found 3:
[1] Google
[2] Thunderstone
http://www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pages/Appliance.html
[3] IndexEngines (not out yet)
http://www.indexengines.com/
------
Also, out of curiosity, do people have appliance h/w vendors they like?
These guys seem like they have nice options for pretty colors:
http://www.mbx.com/oem/index.cfm
http://www.mbx.com/oem/options/
David Spencer wrote:
> This reminds me, has anyone every discussed something similar:
>
> - rackmount server ( or for coolness factor, that mini mac)
> - web i/f for config/control
>
> - of course the server would have the following s/w:
> -- web server
> -- lucene / nutch
>
> Part of the work here I think is having a decent web i/f to configure
> the thing and to customize the L&F of the search results.
>
>
>
> jian chen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was searching using google and just found that there was a new
>> feature called "google mini". Initially I thought it was another free
>> service for small companies. Then I realized that it costs quite some
>> money ($4,995) for the hardware and software. (I guess the proprietary
>> software costs a whole lot more than actual hardware.)
>>
>> The "nice" feature is that, you can only index up to 50,000 documents
>> with this price. If you need to index more, sorry, send in the
>> check...
>>
>> It seems to me that any small biz will be ripped off if they install
>> this google mini thing, compared to using Lucene to implement a easy
>> to use search software, which could search up to whatever number of
>> documents you could image.
>>
>> I hope the lucene project could get exposed more to the enterprise so
>> that people know that they have not only cheaper but more importantly,
>> BETTER alternatives.
>>
>> Jian
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org