You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/09/06 00:47:07 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow] ryanyuan commented on issue #5999: [AIRFLOW-XXX] Fix incorrect GCP integration sections

ryanyuan commented on issue #5999: [AIRFLOW-XXX] Fix incorrect GCP integration sections
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5999#issuecomment-528661987
 
 
   I found this issue when I was browsing this airflow doc using my mobile. See screenshot below:
   ![IMG_3038](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7124535/64392683-2e789300-d091-11e9-8b5b-3c999ff85c87.png)
   
   I don't use this page quite often now because I would just jump into the code to see the usages of operators and hooks. But I remember when I just started using Airflow, I always looked at the docs to find what parameters should I parse to the operators and hook.
   
   It's true that we don't maintain this page well enough and up-to-date. But I like your idea that replacing the operators' links with the package link. 
   
   And it is also important that make the integration doc more consistent across every module. For example, some AWS and Azure integration docs provide a link to the specific hook while GCP integration docs only give links to operators.
   
   @mik-laj 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services