Re: Antwort: Re: URGENT! HELP ME! Tree2 state problem

[Emmanuel Jay <em...@gmail.com>]

Any chance this has made it to the nightly builds?

Thanks,

Emmanuel

On 9/23/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Its a real PITA in JIRA (especially with all of the emails its
> generating) to mark things resovled and then later close them. There
> is also no bulk close in JIRA. Otherwise the ideal thing to do would
> be resovle everything and then close when we release.
>
> I'm working on the new emergency build right now but I will turn my
> attention to the latest tree2 stuff shortly.
>
> sean
>
> On 9/23/05, Jon Travis <jt...@p00p.org> wrote:
> > Can't vote on 564, as it's been closed.
> >
> > Isn't there some process by which bugs are verified as correctly
> > fixing the problem before they are closed?
> >
> > -- Jon
> >
> >
> > On Sep 23, 2005, at 8:07 AM, mathias.werlitz@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The issue is still open ... so the patch was not applied yet.
> > > By the way, the tree2 is corruped by patch MYFACES-564: command
> > > components for a node do not work anymore.
> > >
> > > I already commented the issue but no response so far. Vote for
> > > MYFACES-568 and MYFACES-564 maybe this speeds up a bit.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Mathias Werlitz
> > >
> > > emmanuelj@gmail.com schrieb am 23.09.2005 15:16:40:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Anybody know if this patch has made it to the nightly build?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > > > On 9/18/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I think that this is probable, Sean, out tree2 expert is now busy
> > > with
> > > > the release, but when this is over I am sure he will take a look to
> > > > the patch. To me that patch seems ok but I am not familiar with
> > > tree2.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/9/18, Emmanuel Jay <em...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > ok, but in any case do you know if the patch will make it into
> > > the nightly
> > > > > build next week?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Emmanuel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/17/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > You can always build the jars yourself using the source
> > > code. Just do
> > > > > > SVN checkout and apply the patch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Right now we are focused on the MyFaces 1.1 release on Monday.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/17/05, Emmanuel Jay < emmanuelj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have the same problem as my app involves changing the
> > > tree2 all the
> > > > > time,
> > > > > > > modifying node, changing the root...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I really hope the patch will make it in the build soon!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Emmanuel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/16/05, Enrico Nicola Mirco <atreeblu@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > Thank you very much for your answer. I hope the patch will
> > > > includes in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > nightly builds quickly.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/16/05, mathias.werlitz@daimlerchrysler.com <
> > > > > > > mathias.werlitz@daimlerchrysler.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You could set preserveToggle="false", but this is the
> > > general
> > > > > problem
> > > > > > > that the tree does not "like" dynamic changing tree
> > > structures, because
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > TreeState is not notified of the changes.
> > > > > > > > > I will propose a patch that will make the tree more
> > > tolerant to
> > > > > > > "incompatible" states, see MYFACES-568.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > atreeblu@gmail.com schrieb am 15.09.2005 14:56:15:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have a tree2 with showRootNode="true"
> > > preserveToggle="true"
> > > > > > > > > > clientSideToggle="true".
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I describe my problem:
> > > > > > > > > > 1) I open a JSP popup page with a tree2 (there are
> > > many nodes
> > > > > under
> > > > > > > the root);
> > > > > > > > > > 2) I expand some node;
> > > > > > > > > > 3) I close popup;
> > > > > > > > > > 4) I reopen the popup with another tree2 that, in
> > > this case, has
> > > > > > > > > > only the root because the datamodel is empty. When I
> > > > open the page
> > > > > > > > > > the following error occurs:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Encountered a node "0" with an illogical state. Node
> > > is expanded
> > > > > > > > > > but it is also considered a leaf (a leaf cannot be
> > > considered
> > > > > > > expanded.)"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > When I populate the TreeNode the new TreeNodeBase is
> > > create as
> > > > > Leaf,
> > > > > > > > > > and then, if it has at least a child, I set Leaf=false.
> > > > I tried to
> > > > > > > > > > set Leaf=false but the problem is not resolved.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I tried to use collapsePath("0") in the backbean but
> > > it doesn't
> > > > > work.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think the tree attempts to restore the previous
> > > tree node state.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please everyone help me!!!
> > > > > > > > > > Thank you
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> >
> >
>