You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2008/04/03 18:36:35 UTC
More manifest entries?
I just noticed some other projects include more info in the jar
manifests about their provenance using something like this:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<archive>
<index>true</index>
<compress>true</compress>
<manifestEntries>
<Implementation-Vendor>Apache Software Foundation</
Implementation-Vendor>
<Implementation-Vendor-Id>org.apache</Implementation-
Vendor-Id>
<Package>org.apache.activeio</Package>
<Extension-Name>${project.artifactId}</Extension-Name>
<Implementation-Version>${project.version}</
Implementation-Version>
</manifestEntries>
</archive>
</configuration>
</plugin>
Would this be a good idea? I guess we could pop something like this
in the project pom.
Not sure whether or not I'll have time to play with this.
thanks
david jencks
Re: More manifest entries?
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Sounds good.
Alex
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:36 PM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> I just noticed some other projects include more info in the jar manifests
> about their provenance using something like this:
>
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> <artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
> <configuration>
> <archive>
> <index>true</index>
> <compress>true</compress>
> <manifestEntries>
> <Implementation-Vendor>Apache Software
> Foundation</Implementation-Vendor>
>
> <Implementation-Vendor-Id>org.apache</Implementation-Vendor-Id>
>
> <Package>org.apache.activeio</Package>
> <Extension-Name>${project.artifactId}</Extension-Name>
>
> <Implementation-Version>${project.version}</Implementation-Version>
>
> </manifestEntries>
> </archive>
> </configuration>
> </plugin>
>
>
> Would this be a good idea? I guess we could pop something like this in
> the project pom.
>
> Not sure whether or not I'll have time to play with this.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>