You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Ugo Cei <ug...@apache.org> on 2004/11/04 14:24:45 UTC
FirstFriday
Tomorrow is FirstFiday ([1]), isn't it? Regardless of what you're doing
tomorrow, I would like to invite all committers and interested users to
hang around on the IRC channel <irc://irc.freenode.net/#cocoon>, which
should be more popular, IMHO. One of the nice things about IRC is that
you can join and just lurk without being too distracted. Personally,
I'll be there even if I won't probably be very active until late in the
evening (CET).
Ugo
[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/FirstFriday
--
Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
Re: FirstFriday
Posted by Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Le 4 nov. 04, à 14:24, Ugo Cei a écrit :
>
>> Tomorrow is FirstFiday ([1]), isn't it? ...
>
> Thanks Ugo - I'll be teaching in the morning and I'm not supposed to be
> on IRC simultaneously...
Me neither. Maybe somebody could summarize the issues that you have discussed :-)
--
Reinhard
Re: FirstFriday
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Le 4 nov. 04, à 14:24, Ugo Cei a écrit :
> Tomorrow is FirstFiday ([1]), isn't it? Regardless of what you're
> doing tomorrow, I would like to invite all committers and interested
> users to hang around on the IRC channel
> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#cocoon>, which should be more popular, IMHO.
> One of the nice things about IRC is that you can join and just lurk
> without being too distracted. Personally, I'll be there even if I
> won't probably be very active until late in the evening (CET).
Thanks Ugo - I'll be teaching in the morning and I'm not supposed to be
on IRC simultaneously...
But you're right, hanging around and participating in the occasional
discussion allows often interesting discussions to happen (and fun ones
sometimes, it'll be Friday after all ;-)
-Bertrand
Re: Patches for 2.1.6
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>.
Luigi Bai wrote:
>
> Please consdier the following patches for 3.1.6:
>
> [PATCH] namespace issues with XMLDBTransformer
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28723
Can this be marked as duplicate of 30924? Seems to me patch in 30924 also uses
xml serializer.
> [Patch] XMLDBSource cannot handle BinaryResources
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30924
>
> [Patch] XMLDBSource should accept scheme://user:pass@host:port/path URIs
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30928
>
> [PATCH] XMLDBTransformer can use username/password to access XMLDB
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31064
Can you create patches against sources in the subversion, using "svn diff"?
PS Generally speaking, patches should be created in "unified diff" format (this
is the format of choice here), using "diff -u" command. And "svn diff" generates
patches exactly in this format.
Thanks,
Vadim
Patches for 2.1.6
Posted by Luigi Bai <lp...@focalpoint.com>.
Please consdier the following patches for 3.1.6:
[PATCH] namespace issues with XMLDBTransformer
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28723
[Patch] XMLDBSource cannot handle BinaryResources
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30924
[Patch] XMLDBSource should accept scheme://user:pass@host:port/path
URIs
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30928
[PATCH] XMLDBTransformer can use username/password to access XMLDB
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31064
The rewrite to incorporate commons-fileupload is not likely to be done for
3.1.6? If not, please consider the following patch:
[PATCH] MultipartParser can now handle multipart/mixed
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067