You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/17 20:38:32 UTC
[GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Hi
As per my initial idea, I have been using jQuery to build JS viewer till
now and I am now in a point to move out of jQuery and start with something
that makes our viewer better. For the same, I need to choose a JS MV*
framework.
As you might know, there are lots of JS frameworks available. I was
wondering if someone has already weighed some criteria to decide on one
framework for any project. I am currently looking at Backbone.JS and
AngularJS. Out of these, AngularJS seems to have some better reviews. I was
wondering if I can get any other suggestions here so that I can decide on
using a framework.
Thanks
Bhargav Golla
Developer. Freelancer.
B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
BITS-Pilani
Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> |
LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
| Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
Re: FW: [GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Posted by Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan
Stef added localhost:8080 to the allowed hosts and it is working now. But,
I agree that I should rely on a server I set up for myself. Will take the
.NET implementation guidelines you shared and setup a local server to help
me.
Thanks
Bhargav Golla
Developer. Freelancer.
B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
BITS-Pilani
Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> |
LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
| Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dan Haywood
<da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>wrote:
>
>
>
> On 24 July 2013 21:31, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I use my viewer from Jetty server, origin URL is http://localhost:8080/
>>
>
> Bhargav...
> I'd be surprised if this works.. I suspect CORS would need the actual
> hostname, not just "localhost".
>
> But in any case, I'd rather you had a self-contained development
> environment, with your own server, rather than relying upon Richard and
> Stef's server up at http://mvc.nakedobjects.net:1081/RestDemo... not
> really good practice to rely on someone else's server (which might not
> always be available) when doing development.
>
> To that end, I just mailed you (and Dimuthu) details about how to run up
> RO.Net (and NO MVC) locally, with the AdventureWorks database, and shared a
> .zip file with you. Please take the time to work through that and get
> RO.Net running locally.
>
> Thx
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks for the help.
>>
>> Bhargav Golla
>> Developer. Freelancer.
>> B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
>> BITS-Pilani
>> Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> | LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
>> | Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Cascarini <
>> scascarini@nakedobjects.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Bhargav,
>>>
>>> if you let me know your origin url I'll set you up in the CORS config.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: FW: [GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Posted by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>.
On 24 July 2013 21:31, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I use my viewer from Jetty server, origin URL is http://localhost:8080/
>
Bhargav...
I'd be surprised if this works.. I suspect CORS would need the actual
hostname, not just "localhost".
But in any case, I'd rather you had a self-contained development
environment, with your own server, rather than relying upon Richard and
Stef's server up at http://mvc.nakedobjects.net:1081/RestDemo... not
really good practice to rely on someone else's server (which might not
always be available) when doing development.
To that end, I just mailed you (and Dimuthu) details about how to run up
RO.Net (and NO MVC) locally, with the AdventureWorks database, and shared a
.zip file with you. Please take the time to work through that and get
RO.Net running locally.
Thx
Dan
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Bhargav Golla
> Developer. Freelancer.
> B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
> BITS-Pilani
> Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> | LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
> | Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Cascarini <
> scascarini@nakedobjects.org> wrote:
>
>> Bhargav,
>>
>> if you let me know your origin url I'll set you up in the CORS config.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
Re: FW: [GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Posted by Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I use my viewer from Jetty server, origin URL is http://localhost:8080/
Thanks for the help.
Bhargav Golla
Developer. Freelancer.
B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
BITS-Pilani
Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> |
LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
| Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Cascarini <
scascarini@nakedobjects.org> wrote:
> Bhargav,
>
> if you let me know your origin url I'll set you up in the CORS config.
>
> cheers
>
> Stef
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> When I am trying to use the .NET implementation available at
>> http://mvc.nakedobjects.net:1081/RestDemo I am hitting a CORS issue. How
>> can I install a local copy of .NET implementation?
>>
>> Bhargav Golla
>> Developer. Freelancer.
>> B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
>> BITS-Pilani
>> Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> | LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
>> | Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Dan Haywood <
>> dan@haywood-associates.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 23 July 2013 17:36, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard Pawson <
>>>> rpawson@nakedobjects.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could I get any further pointers about RO for .NET server? How
>>>> different is it from the ROspec defined here[http://restfulobjects.org
>>>> ]?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bhargav... it's compatible. In fact, the .NET implementation is in
>>> better shape/better tested than the Isis one. So that's another workaround
>>> if you are blocked by an issue/defect with Isis' implementation - run
>>> against the .NET impl.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: FW: [GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Posted by Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com>.
When I am trying to use the .NET implementation available at
http://mvc.nakedobjects.net:1081/RestDemo I am hitting a CORS issue. How
can I install a local copy of .NET implementation?
Bhargav Golla
Developer. Freelancer.
B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
BITS-Pilani
Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> |
LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
| Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Dan Haywood
<da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>wrote:
>
> On 23 July 2013 17:36, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard Pawson <rpawson@nakedobjects.net
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Could I get any further pointers about RO for .NET server? How different
>> is it from the ROspec defined here[http://restfulobjects.org]?
>>
>
> Bhargav... it's compatible. In fact, the .NET implementation is in better
> shape/better tested than the Isis one. So that's another workaround if you
> are blocked by an issue/defect with Isis' implementation - run against the
> .NET impl.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
Re: FW: [GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Posted by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>.
On 23 July 2013 17:36, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard Pawson <rp...@nakedobjects.net>wrote:
>
>>
>> Could I get any further pointers about RO for .NET server? How different
> is it from the ROspec defined here[http://restfulobjects.org]?
>
Bhargav... it's compatible. In fact, the .NET implementation is in better
shape/better tested than the Isis one. So that's another workaround if you
are blocked by an issue/defect with Isis' implementation - run against the
.NET impl.
Dan
Re: [GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Posted by Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Stef,
I was wondering if you can share your thoughts on this.
Regards
Bhargav Golla
Developer. Freelancer.
B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
BITS-Pilani
Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> |
LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
| Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Dan Haywood
<da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>wrote:
> Bhargav,
>
> Did you take a look at Spiro yet? [1]
>
> v0.81 builds on Backbone.js. However, I know that Stef has been working to
> make it support AngularJS too; like you my feeling is that AngularJS is
> probably the better framework to work from.
>
> Looking at the recent commits, there's a lot of activity going on in this
> space. It might be worth checking in with Stef to see how stable things
> are there.
>
> Dan
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/NakedObjectsGroup/spiro/wiki/Introduction-to-Spiro
> [2] https://github.com/NakedObjectsGroup/spiro/commits/master?page=1
>
>
> On 17 July 2013 19:38, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > As per my initial idea, I have been using jQuery to build JS viewer till
> > now and I am now in a point to move out of jQuery and start with
> something
> > that makes our viewer better. For the same, I need to choose a JS MV*
> > framework.
> >
> > As you might know, there are lots of JS frameworks available. I was
> > wondering if someone has already weighed some criteria to decide on one
> > framework for any project. I am currently looking at Backbone.JS and
> > AngularJS. Out of these, AngularJS seems to have some better reviews. I
> was
> > wondering if I can get any other suggestions here so that I can decide on
> > using a framework.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Bhargav Golla
> > Developer. Freelancer.
> > B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
> > BITS-Pilani
> > Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> |
> > LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
> > | Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
> >
>
Re: [GSoC JS Viewer] Any suggestions on JS framework?
Posted by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>.
Bhargav,
Did you take a look at Spiro yet? [1]
v0.81 builds on Backbone.js. However, I know that Stef has been working to
make it support AngularJS too; like you my feeling is that AngularJS is
probably the better framework to work from.
Looking at the recent commits, there's a lot of activity going on in this
space. It might be worth checking in with Stef to see how stable things
are there.
Dan
[1] https://github.com/NakedObjectsGroup/spiro/wiki/Introduction-to-Spiro
[2] https://github.com/NakedObjectsGroup/spiro/commits/master?page=1
On 17 July 2013 19:38, Bhargav Golla <bh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> As per my initial idea, I have been using jQuery to build JS viewer till
> now and I am now in a point to move out of jQuery and start with something
> that makes our viewer better. For the same, I need to choose a JS MV*
> framework.
>
> As you might know, there are lots of JS frameworks available. I was
> wondering if someone has already weighed some criteria to decide on one
> framework for any project. I am currently looking at Backbone.JS and
> AngularJS. Out of these, AngularJS seems to have some better reviews. I was
> wondering if I can get any other suggestions here so that I can decide on
> using a framework.
>
> Thanks
> Bhargav Golla
> Developer. Freelancer.
> B.E (Hons.) Computer Science
> BITS-Pilani
> Github <http://www.github.com/bhargavgolla> |
> LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bhargavgolla>
> | Website <http://www.bhargavgolla.com/>
>