You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "thisisnic (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2025/10/21 10:06:41 UTC
[PR] GH-47000: [R] concat_tables on a record_batch causes segfault [arrow]
thisisnic opened a new pull request, #47885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47885
### Rationale for this change
Segfault due to combining recordbatches in concat_tables
### What changes are included in this PR?
Convert to tables before combining
### Are these changes tested?
Yes
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] GH-47000: [R] concat_tables on a record_batch causes segfault [arrow]
Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47885#issuecomment-3425764891
:warning: GitHub issue #47000 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] GH-47000: [R] concat_tables on a record_batch causes segfault [arrow]
Posted by "conbench-apache-arrow[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #47885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47885#issuecomment-3447890020
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 065203dc8491c1aa2d9156f562ad5e30f2354ca3.
There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉
The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/53670666324) has more details. It also includes information about 7 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] GH-47000: [R] concat_tables on a record_batch causes segfault [arrow]
Posted by "thisisnic (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
thisisnic merged PR #47885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47885
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] GH-47000: [R] concat_tables on a record_batch causes segfault [arrow]
Posted by "thisisnic (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
thisisnic commented on PR #47885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47885#issuecomment-3446874224
> Thanks for this. I'm not sure the answer is yes (or no!), but do we need to mention this in the docs for `concat_tables()`?
I think we should, so I have, thanks for flagging!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org