You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pdfbox.apache.org by Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de> on 2015/07/07 09:34:08 UTC

2.0.0. RC was Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi,

> Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de> hat am 6. Juli 2015 um 11:55
> geschrieben:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not
> the
> only one ;-)
> 
> We are down to 24 issues marked with "Fix Version 2.0.0".
> 
> @Assignees: please have a look at "your" issues and verify if we really should
> wait for them to be resolved first or if those could be moved to a later
> release
> (2.1.0 or 3.0.0)
> 
> To start with a release candidate would be another option, but I'd prefer to
> release 2.0.0.
> 
> WDYT?

As there seems to be a majority supporting a release candidate I'd like to find
out what exactly a possible RC would be so that we are all on the same page:

- is it feature complete? IMHO, yes
- is the api stable? IMHO, yes
- do we create a branch or just release from a tag? IMHO, we should branch,
especially if the api is meant to be stable
- we won't push the RC to maven central but would provide a possibility to
download the RC. This is a common approach in other apache projects


How long do we wait until releasing the final 2.0? We might define some
rule/goal for that.

What exactly will be the difference between the RC and the final release? (there
are not that much open tickets left, so that I presume it won't be that big)

I'm in favour of a final release without an RC. Our release process is quite
lean so that it wouldn't hurt to much to release a 2.0.x bugfix release.

BR
Andreas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org


Re: 2.0.0. RC was Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
Hi,

> Am 07.07.2015 um 09:34 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de> hat am 6. Juli 2015 um 11:55
>> geschrieben:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not
>> the
>> only one ;-)
>> 
>> We are down to 24 issues marked with "Fix Version 2.0.0".
>> 
>> @Assignees: please have a look at "your" issues and verify if we really should
>> wait for them to be resolved first or if those could be moved to a later
>> release
>> (2.1.0 or 3.0.0)
>> 
>> To start with a release candidate would be another option, but I'd prefer to
>> release 2.0.0.
>> 
>> WDYT?
> 
> As there seems to be a majority supporting a release candidate I'd like to find
> out what exactly a possible RC would be so that we are all on the same page:
> 
> - is it feature complete? IMHO, yes

Yes

> - is the api stable? IMHO, yes

A RC should give us the ability to do minor tweaks - if we can't then there is no need for a RC

> - do we create a branch or just release from a tag? IMHO, we should branch,
> especially if the api is meant to be stable
> - we won't push the RC to maven central but would provide a possibility to
> download the RC. This is a common approach in other apache projects
> 
> 
> How long do we wait until releasing the final 2.0? We might define some
> rule/goal for that.

dependent on issues coming up, which are due to the RC and not because of new issues, a month or two should be fine

> 
> What exactly will be the difference between the RC and the final release? (there
> are not that much open tickets left, so that I presume it won't be that big)

changes to the API because of feedback. If we declare the API to be final we don't need a RC IMHO but could follow up with a bug fix release shortly.

> 
> I'm in favour of a final release without an RC. Our release process is quite
> lean so that it wouldn't hurt to much to release a 2.0.x bugfix release.
> 
> BR
> Andreas
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org