You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by Kevin Monroe <ke...@canonical.com> on 2017/10/18 16:37:30 UTC
kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Hey folks,
In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were back in
the repo:
$ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb
http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop
contrib'
$ apt-cache policy kafka
kafka:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
Version table:
*** 0.10.1.1-1 500
500
http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64
bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
$ sudo apt-get install kafka
...
$ dpkg -l | grep kafka
ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came up for
1.2.0?:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.gmail.com%3E
Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an oversight
that would require removing the binaries later.
Thanks,
-Kevin
Re: kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Posted by Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>.
Oh..that's definitely my bad...
I only remember I've done that but didn't conduct a verification.
Might be introduced in RC2.
Let me regenerate repo files and make sure it's in good shape.
Thank you for watching my back, Kevin!
2017-10-30 12:36 GMT+08:00 Kevin Monroe <ke...@canonical.com>:
> Evans, I'm not following you. Kafka is here in the 1.2.1 repo:
>
> http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
> 04/x86_64/pool/contrib/k/kafka/kafka_0.10.1.1-1_all.deb
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I already exclude kafka on S3 when building repos.
> >
> > Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>於 2017年10月28日 週六，上午12:47寫道：
> >
> > > Then we need to delete the packages before the release.
> > > --
> > > With regards,
> > > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> > > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> > > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > This changed to green only if:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Kafka released new version that bump rocksdb dep up to 5.5.5+. As
> of
> > > now
> > > > I see 5.0.1 in 0.11 release
> > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.11.0/gradle/
> > dependencies.gradle#L65
> > > >
> > > > 2. Bigtop bump the kafka version
> > > >
> > > > 2017-10-27 3:11 GMT+08:00 Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> That is not o.k, for the same reason we removed it from 1.2.0
> > > >>
> > > >> Olaf
> > > >>
> > > >> > Am 26.10.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Kevin Monroe <
> > > kevin.monroe@canonical.com
> > > >> >:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Evans, are we ok to provide kafka 0.10.1.1 in the repos?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Monroe <
> > > >> kevin.monroe@canonical.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Hey folks,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were
> > > back
> > > >> in
> > > >> >> the repo:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> $ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb http://repos.bigtop.apache.
> > > >> >> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop contrib'
> > > >> >> $ apt-cache policy kafka
> > > >> >> kafka:
> > > >> >> Installed: (none)
> > > >> >> Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
> > > >> >> Version table:
> > > >> >> *** 0.10.1.1-1 500
> > > >> >> 500 http://repos.bigtop.apache.
> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16
> > .
> > > >> >> 04/x86_64 bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
> > > >> >> $ sudo apt-get install kafka
> > > >> >> ...
> > > >> >> $ dpkg -l | grep kafka
> > > >> >> ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came
> up
> > > for
> > > >> >> 1.2.0?:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%
> > > >> >> 3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.
> > gmail.com
> > > %3E
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an
> > > >> oversight
> > > >> >> that would require removing the binaries later.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Thanks,
> > > >> >> -Kevin
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Posted by Kevin Monroe <ke...@canonical.com>.
Evans, I'm not following you. Kafka is here in the 1.2.1 repo:
http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64/pool/contrib/k/kafka/kafka_0.10.1.1-1_all.deb
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org> wrote:
> I already exclude kafka on S3 when building repos.
>
> Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>於 2017年10月28日 週六，上午12:47寫道：
>
> > Then we need to delete the packages before the release.
> > --
> > With regards,
> > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> >
> > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > This changed to green only if:
> > >
> > > 1. Kafka released new version that bump rocksdb dep up to 5.5.5+. As of
> > now
> > > I see 5.0.1 in 0.11 release
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.11.0/gradle/
> dependencies.gradle#L65
> > >
> > > 2. Bigtop bump the kafka version
> > >
> > > 2017-10-27 3:11 GMT+08:00 Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> That is not o.k, for the same reason we removed it from 1.2.0
> > >>
> > >> Olaf
> > >>
> > >> > Am 26.10.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Kevin Monroe <
> > kevin.monroe@canonical.com
> > >> >:
> > >> >
> > >> > Evans, are we ok to provide kafka 0.10.1.1 in the repos?
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Monroe <
> > >> kevin.monroe@canonical.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hey folks,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were
> > back
> > >> in
> > >> >> the repo:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> $ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb http://repos.bigtop.apache.
> > >> >> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop contrib'
> > >> >> $ apt-cache policy kafka
> > >> >> kafka:
> > >> >> Installed: (none)
> > >> >> Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
> > >> >> Version table:
> > >> >> *** 0.10.1.1-1 500
> > >> >> 500 http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16
> .
> > >> >> 04/x86_64 bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
> > >> >> $ sudo apt-get install kafka
> > >> >> ...
> > >> >> $ dpkg -l | grep kafka
> > >> >> ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came up
> > for
> > >> >> 1.2.0?:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%
> > >> >> 3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.
> gmail.com
> > %3E
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an
> > >> oversight
> > >> >> that would require removing the binaries later.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >> -Kevin
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Posted by Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>.
I already exclude kafka on S3 when building repos.
Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>於 2017年10月28日 週六，上午12:47寫道：
> Then we need to delete the packages before the release.
> --
> With regards,
> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>
> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org> wrote:
> > This changed to green only if:
> >
> > 1. Kafka released new version that bump rocksdb dep up to 5.5.5+. As of
> now
> > I see 5.0.1 in 0.11 release
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.11.0/gradle/dependencies.gradle#L65
> >
> > 2. Bigtop bump the kafka version
> >
> > 2017-10-27 3:11 GMT+08:00 Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> That is not o.k, for the same reason we removed it from 1.2.0
> >>
> >> Olaf
> >>
> >> > Am 26.10.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Kevin Monroe <
> kevin.monroe@canonical.com
> >> >:
> >> >
> >> > Evans, are we ok to provide kafka 0.10.1.1 in the repos?
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Monroe <
> >> kevin.monroe@canonical.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hey folks,
> >> >>
> >> >> In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were
> back
> >> in
> >> >> the repo:
> >> >>
> >> >> $ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb http://repos.bigtop.apache.
> >> >> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop contrib'
> >> >> $ apt-cache policy kafka
> >> >> kafka:
> >> >> Installed: (none)
> >> >> Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
> >> >> Version table:
> >> >> *** 0.10.1.1-1 500
> >> >> 500 http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
> >> >> 04/x86_64 bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
> >> >> $ sudo apt-get install kafka
> >> >> ...
> >> >> $ dpkg -l | grep kafka
> >> >> ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
> >> >>
> >> >> Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came up
> for
> >> >> 1.2.0?:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%
> >> >> 3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.gmail.com
> %3E
> >> >>
> >> >> Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an
> >> oversight
> >> >> that would require removing the binaries later.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> -Kevin
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Then we need to delete the packages before the release.
--
With regards,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org> wrote:
> This changed to green only if:
>
> 1. Kafka released new version that bump rocksdb dep up to 5.5.5+. As of now
> I see 5.0.1 in 0.11 release
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.11.0/gradle/dependencies.gradle#L65
>
> 2. Bigtop bump the kafka version
>
> 2017-10-27 3:11 GMT+08:00 Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> That is not o.k, for the same reason we removed it from 1.2.0
>>
>> Olaf
>>
>> > Am 26.10.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Kevin Monroe <kevin.monroe@canonical.com
>> >:
>> >
>> > Evans, are we ok to provide kafka 0.10.1.1 in the repos?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Monroe <
>> kevin.monroe@canonical.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey folks,
>> >>
>> >> In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were back
>> in
>> >> the repo:
>> >>
>> >> $ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb http://repos.bigtop.apache.
>> >> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop contrib'
>> >> $ apt-cache policy kafka
>> >> kafka:
>> >> Installed: (none)
>> >> Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
>> >> Version table:
>> >> *** 0.10.1.1-1 500
>> >> 500 http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
>> >> 04/x86_64 bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
>> >> $ sudo apt-get install kafka
>> >> ...
>> >> $ dpkg -l | grep kafka
>> >> ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
>> >>
>> >> Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came up for
>> >> 1.2.0?:
>> >>
>> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%
>> >> 3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >>
>> >> Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an
>> oversight
>> >> that would require removing the binaries later.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Kevin
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Posted by Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>.
This changed to green only if:
1. Kafka released new version that bump rocksdb dep up to 5.5.5+. As of now
I see 5.0.1 in 0.11 release
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.11.0/gradle/dependencies.gradle#L65
2. Bigtop bump the kafka version
2017-10-27 3:11 GMT+08:00 Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>:
> Hi,
>
> That is not o.k, for the same reason we removed it from 1.2.0
>
> Olaf
>
> > Am 26.10.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Kevin Monroe <kevin.monroe@canonical.com
> >:
> >
> > Evans, are we ok to provide kafka 0.10.1.1 in the repos?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Monroe <
> kevin.monroe@canonical.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were back
> in
> >> the repo:
> >>
> >> $ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb http://repos.bigtop.apache.
> >> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop contrib'
> >> $ apt-cache policy kafka
> >> kafka:
> >> Installed: (none)
> >> Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
> >> Version table:
> >> *** 0.10.1.1-1 500
> >> 500 http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
> >> 04/x86_64 bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
> >> $ sudo apt-get install kafka
> >> ...
> >> $ dpkg -l | grep kafka
> >> ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
> >>
> >> Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came up for
> >> 1.2.0?:
> >>
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%
> >> 3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>
> >> Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an
> oversight
> >> that would require removing the binaries later.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Kevin
> >>
>
>
Re: kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Posted by Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>.
Hi,
That is not o.k, for the same reason we removed it from 1.2.0
Olaf
> Am 26.10.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Kevin Monroe <ke...@canonical.com>:
>
> Evans, are we ok to provide kafka 0.10.1.1 in the repos?
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Monroe <ke...@canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were back in
>> the repo:
>>
>> $ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb http://repos.bigtop.apache.
>> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop contrib'
>> $ apt-cache policy kafka
>> kafka:
>> Installed: (none)
>> Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
>> Version table:
>> *** 0.10.1.1-1 500
>> 500 http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
>> 04/x86_64 bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
>> $ sudo apt-get install kafka
>> ...
>> $ dpkg -l | grep kafka
>> ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
>>
>> Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came up for
>> 1.2.0?:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%
>> 3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an oversight
>> that would require removing the binaries later.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Kevin
>>
Re: kafka back in the 1.2.1 repos -- legit?
Posted by Kevin Monroe <ke...@canonical.com>.
Evans, are we ok to provide kafka 0.10.1.1 in the repos?
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Monroe <ke...@canonical.com>
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> In testing the 1.2.1 repos, I noticed kafka and kafka-server were back in
> the repo:
>
> $ sudo add-apt-repository -u 'deb http://repos.bigtop.apache.
> org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.04/x86_64 bigtop contrib'
> $ apt-cache policy kafka
> kafka:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 0.10.1.1-1
> Version table:
> *** 0.10.1.1-1 500
> 500 http://repos.bigtop.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/ubuntu/16.
> 04/x86_64 bigtop/contrib amd64 Packages
> $ sudo apt-get install kafka
> ...
> $ dpkg -l | grep kafka
> ii kafka 0.10.1.1-1
>
> Has the licensing been resolved since the removal of kafka came up for
> 1.2.0?:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bigtop-announce/201708.mbox/%
> 3CCAKGhRiv08aCbcoTLb1LKztpHwChbaQF_nGOdiD99uLH7xGkB5w@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Huge +1 if it's legit, but I wanted to make sure this wasn't an oversight
> that would require removing the binaries later.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kevin
>