Re: sa-update DNS not updated (was: Block "wrote:" spams)

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

Kenneth Porter writes:
> --On Friday, November 03, 2006 5:43 PM +0000 Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> > there's a rule that matches them in 3.1.x sa-update, fwiw.
> 
> I don't see it either. What's the name of the rule?

for what it's worth, it's 'RCVD_FORGED_WROTE'.

> Dates on files in /var/lib/spamassassin are 20061024.
> 
> I ran sa-update -D and got this at the end:
> 
> [7784] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org
> [7784] dbg: channel: update directory 
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org
> [7784] dbg: channel: channel cf file 
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
> [7784] dbg: channel: channel pre file 
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org.pre
> [7784] dbg: channel: metadata version = 431276
> [7784] dbg: dns: 7.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org => 431276, parsed as 431276
> [7784] dbg: channel: current version is 431276, new version is 431276, 
> skipping channel
> 
> 
> Is this new rule supposed to be in 431276?
> 
> I also tried running the DNS query with dig against a few of the servers 
> for that zone and get the same answer, so it's not my local DNS server 
> caching an old answer.
> 
> I chased through the update logic and found the update archive here:
> 
> <http://spamassassin.kluge.net/updates/>
> 
> I see some later updates there, and the "wrote" rule is in 472539. Is the 
> DNS not getting updated to push these new rules out?

Hi guys --

yes, I think you're right -- it looks like SpamAssassin 3.1.x rule
updates are not generated automatically, unlike the trunk ones :(

Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?

--j.

Re: sa-update DNS not updated (was: Block "wrote:" spams)

["Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>]

Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:22:12PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>>> Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?
> 
> I posted this a while ago:
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualRuleUpdates
> 
> It's even linked in from the Development Information link. :)
> 
>> 	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PublishingRuleUpdates
> 
> Why is there another doc about it?  :(

I don't know, but the funniest part is that Justin made it.  It's linked 
to from the RuleUpdates page.

Daryl

Re: sa-update DNS not updated (was: Block "wrote:" spams)

[Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:22:12PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?

I posted this a while ago:

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualRuleUpdates

It's even linked in from the Development Information link. :)

> 	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PublishingRuleUpdates

Why is there another doc about it?  :(

-- 
Randomly Selected Tagline:
 War over! Balls thoroughly licked.

Re: sa-update DNS not updated (was: Block "wrote:" spams)

["Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>]

Justin Mason wrote:

> Hi guys --
> 
> yes, I think you're right -- it looks like SpamAssassin 3.1.x rule
> updates are not generated automatically, unlike the trunk ones :(
> 
> Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?

You've got to roll your own.

  - commit changes to rules/branches/3.1/ and to branches/3.1/rules/

  - do some testing of the rules if you're feeling unlucky

  - make the update package, update dns

	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PublishingRuleUpdates


Daryl