You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/16 13:02:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OPENJPA-2798) OpenJPA need to be more Java11
friendly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17016891#comment-17016891 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on OPENJPA-2798:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit 7ec0015edf61a738fd6a5cc22ed7c69002b74948 in openjpa's branch refs/heads/master from Maxim Solodovnik
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openjpa.git;h=7ec0015 ]
[OPENJPA-2798] java11 friendly (#57)
* [OPENJPA-2798] geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec is replaced with jakarta.persistence, Automatic module names are added
> OpenJPA need to be more Java11 friendly
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-2798
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2798
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: third-party
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: Maxim Solodovnik
> Assignee: Maxim Solodovnik
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.1.1
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In case one will add OpenJPA as a dependency to Java11 modularized project the following issue will arise:
> openjpa depends on "Apache Geronimo JPA Spec 2.2"
> geronimo jpa doesn't have automatic module name and automatically being resolved as
> geronimo.jpa.2.2.spec
> Which is invalid java identifier :(((
> I believe OpenJPA should be more Java11 friendly
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)