You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Glen Mazza (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/11/07 20:03:50 UTC
[jira] Created: (CXF-1185) Should Java REST annotations (JRA)
values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
Should Java REST annotations (JRA) values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CXF-1185
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185
Project: CXF
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: REST
Reporter: Glen Mazza
Priority: Minor
Team, presently our JRA annotations[1] apparently are incorporated from XFire's annotations--see here[2] and Example #14 here[3]. I'm not sure, but I wonder if we should switch the following annotations to a CXF package:
import org.codehaus.jra.Delete;
import org.codehaus.jra.Get;
import org.codehaus.jra.HttpResource;
import org.codehaus.jra.Post;
import org.codehaus.jra.Put;
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/http-binding.html#HTTPBinding-JavaRESTAnnotations
[2] http://tinyurl.com/2ldu5z
[3] http://res.sys-con.com/story/oct07/452355/source.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CXF-1185) Should Java REST annotations (JRA)
values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
Posted by "Glen Mazza (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12557889#action_12557889 ]
Glen Mazza commented on CXF-1185:
---------------------------------
OK.
> Should Java REST annotations (JRA) values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1185
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: REST
> Reporter: Glen Mazza
> Priority: Minor
>
> Team, presently our JRA annotations[1] apparently are incorporated from XFire's annotations--see here[2] and Example #14 here[3]. I'm not sure, but I wonder if we should switch the following annotations to a CXF package:
> import org.codehaus.jra.Delete;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Get;
> import org.codehaus.jra.HttpResource;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Post;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Put;
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/http-binding.html#HTTPBinding-JavaRESTAnnotations
> [2] http://tinyurl.com/2ldu5z
> [3] http://res.sys-con.com/story/oct07/452355/source.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (CXF-1185) Should Java REST annotations (JRA) values
be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
Posted by "Glen Mazza (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Glen Mazza closed CXF-1185.
---------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Should Java REST annotations (JRA) values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1185
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: REST
> Reporter: Glen Mazza
> Priority: Minor
>
> Team, presently our JRA annotations[1] apparently are incorporated from XFire's annotations--see here[2] and Example #14 here[3]. I'm not sure, but I wonder if we should switch the following annotations to a CXF package:
> import org.codehaus.jra.Delete;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Get;
> import org.codehaus.jra.HttpResource;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Post;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Put;
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/http-binding.html#HTTPBinding-JavaRESTAnnotations
> [2] http://tinyurl.com/2ldu5z
> [3] http://res.sys-con.com/story/oct07/452355/source.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CXF-1185) Should Java REST annotations (JRA)
values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
Posted by "Jervis Liu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12557569#action_12557569 ]
Jervis Liu commented on CXF-1185:
---------------------------------
No, I dont think this is necessary. The JRA annotations has served CXF HTTP binding very well so far, I dont see any problems to continue using it from codehaus. With more and more ppl start to move to the standard JSR-311 (CXF JAX-RS), the day will come when CXF HTTP binding get deprecated. Before this happens, we'd better just leave it as it is.
Jervis
> Should Java REST annotations (JRA) values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1185
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: REST
> Reporter: Glen Mazza
> Priority: Minor
>
> Team, presently our JRA annotations[1] apparently are incorporated from XFire's annotations--see here[2] and Example #14 here[3]. I'm not sure, but I wonder if we should switch the following annotations to a CXF package:
> import org.codehaus.jra.Delete;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Get;
> import org.codehaus.jra.HttpResource;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Post;
> import org.codehaus.jra.Put;
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/http-binding.html#HTTPBinding-JavaRESTAnnotations
> [2] http://tinyurl.com/2ldu5z
> [3] http://res.sys-con.com/story/oct07/452355/source.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.