You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "huangtengfei (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/03/07 11:12:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-38434) Correct semantic of CheckAnalysis.getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn method

huangtengfei created SPARK-38434:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Correct semantic of CheckAnalysis.getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn method
                 Key: SPARK-38434
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38434
             Project: Spark
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: SQL
    Affects Versions: 3.2.1
            Reporter: huangtengfei


Currently, in `CheckAnalysis` method  [getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn |https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala#L606] implemented as:

{code:java}
  private def getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn(plan: LogicalPlan): (DataType, DataType) => Boolean = {
    val isUnion = plan.isInstanceOf[Union]
    if (isUnion) {
      (dt1: DataType, dt2: DataType) =>
        !DataType.equalsStructurally(dt1, dt2, true)
    } else {
      // SPARK-18058: we shall not care about the nullability of columns
      (dt1: DataType, dt2: DataType) =>
        TypeCoercion.findWiderTypeForTwo(dt1.asNullable, dt2.asNullable).isEmpty
    }
  }
{code}

Return false when data types are compatible, otherwise return true, which is pretty confusing.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org