You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "huangtengfei (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/03/07 11:12:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SPARK-38434) Correct semantic of CheckAnalysis.getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn method
huangtengfei created SPARK-38434:
------------------------------------
Summary: Correct semantic of CheckAnalysis.getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn method
Key: SPARK-38434
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38434
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SQL
Affects Versions: 3.2.1
Reporter: huangtengfei
Currently, in `CheckAnalysis` method [getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn |https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala#L606] implemented as:
{code:java}
private def getDataTypesAreCompatibleFn(plan: LogicalPlan): (DataType, DataType) => Boolean = {
val isUnion = plan.isInstanceOf[Union]
if (isUnion) {
(dt1: DataType, dt2: DataType) =>
!DataType.equalsStructurally(dt1, dt2, true)
} else {
// SPARK-18058: we shall not care about the nullability of columns
(dt1: DataType, dt2: DataType) =>
TypeCoercion.findWiderTypeForTwo(dt1.asNullable, dt2.asNullable).isEmpty
}
}
{code}
Return false when data types are compatible, otherwise return true, which is pretty confusing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org