CheckIndex less picky in trunk?

[Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>]

Hi-

I am investigating a corrupted index. One segment has a term that is
somehow corrupted. The stored fields and term vectors are fine.

The 2.4.1 and 2.9.2 versions of CheckIndex report this problem. The
CheckIndex on trunk does not report this problem, and is much faster.
Did some error-checking get dropped from CheckIndex?

Note that this is against a 2.4 format index, so if that is the
difference it may not be worth fixing.

Lance Norskog

-- 
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: CheckIndex less picky in trunk?

[Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>]

This is odd -- can you post the exception that the 2.4.1/2.9.2
CheckIndex reports?

Mike

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I am investigating a corrupted index. One segment has a term that is
> somehow corrupted. The stored fields and term vectors are fine.
>
> The 2.4.1 and 2.9.2 versions of CheckIndex report this problem. The
> CheckIndex on trunk does not report this problem, and is much faster.
> Did some error-checking get dropped from CheckIndex?
>
> Note that this is against a 2.4 format index, so if that is the
> difference it may not be worth fixing.
>
> Lance Norskog
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> goksron@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org