You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> on 2017/01/06 10:51:20 UTC
[VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Hi all,
As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate the
voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
Thanks,
Ismael
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io>.
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ismael,
>
> Thank you for the KIP. It is a very useful feature.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate
> the
> > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> >
> > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Rajini Sivaram <ra...@gmail.com>.
Ismael,
Thank you for the KIP. It is a very useful feature.
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Rajini
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate the
> voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
>
> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Becket Qin <be...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thanks for the proposal.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Tom Crayford <tc...@heroku.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
> > >
> > > What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"?
> > >
> > > best,
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Ismael,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Jun
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> > > initiate
> > > > > the
> > > > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> > > traffic:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Neha
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Tom Crayford <tc...@heroku.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"?
> >
> > best,
> > Colin
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Ismael,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> > initiate
> > > > the
> > > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> > traffic:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Ismael
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Neha
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Tom Crayford <tc...@heroku.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
>
> What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"?
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Ismael,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> initiate
> > > the
> > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> traffic:
> > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> > > >
> > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Neha
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
Thanks to everyone who voted and provided feedback. The vote has passed
with 5 binding votes (Sriram, Jun, Neha, Becket, Joel) and 4 non-binding
votes (Rajini, Colin, Tom, Roger).
I have updated the relevant wiki pages.
Ismael
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Joel Koshy <jj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since a few people (including myself) felt that listener name was clearer
> > than protocol label, I updated the KIP to use that (as mentioned in the
> > discuss thread). Given that this is a minor change, I don't think we need
> > to restart the vote. If anyone objects to this change, please let me
> know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
> > >
> > > What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"?
> > >
> > > best,
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Ismael,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Jun
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> > > initiate
> > > > > the
> > > > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> > > traffic:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Neha
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Joel Koshy <jj...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since a few people (including myself) felt that listener name was clearer
> than protocol label, I updated the KIP to use that (as mentioned in the
> discuss thread). Given that this is a minor change, I don't think we need
> to restart the vote. If anyone objects to this change, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"?
> >
> > best,
> > Colin
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Ismael,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> > initiate
> > > > the
> > > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> > traffic:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Ismael
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Neha
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
Hi all,
Since a few people (including myself) felt that listener name was clearer
than protocol label, I updated the KIP to use that (as mentioned in the
discuss thread). Given that this is a minor change, I don't think we need
to restart the vote. If anyone objects to this change, please let me know.
Thanks,
Ismael
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
>
> What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"?
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Ismael,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to
> initiate
> > > the
> > > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External
> traffic:
> > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> > > >
> > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Neha
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
What do you think about changing "protocol label" to "listener key"?
best,
Colin
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:23, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Ismael,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate
> > the
> > > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> > >
> > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ismael
> > >
> >
> --
> Thanks,
> Neha
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Neha Narkhede <ne...@confluent.io>.
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hi, Ismael,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
>
> Jun
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate
> the
> > voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
> >
> > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
>
--
Thanks,
Neha
Re: [VOTE] KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io>.
Hi, Ismael,
Thanks for the KIP. +1
Jun
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate the
> voting process for KIP-103: Separation of Internal and External traffic:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 103%3A+Separation+of+Internal+and+External+traffic
>
> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>