You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2022/02/02 19:15:12 UTC

[RESULT] Apache Jena 4.4.0 RC2

The release vote passes with PMC votes from Bruno, Rob and Andy with a 
community vote from Marco.

Moving to stage 2 - commit to the Apache downloads area; push the 
binaries to to maven central; update the website; announce.

     Thanks everyone
     Andy


On 30/01/2022 16:32, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.4.0.
> This is the second proposed release candidate.
> 
> == Changes RC1 -> RC2:
> 
> JENA-2265 (Fuseki UI)
> Use window.location.pathname for the Fuseki URL, fix Vue publicPath
> 
> JENA-2264 (jena-core)
> Improve Resource.getProperty(,lang). Include TestStandardModels.
> 
> JENA-2262 (TestAdmin)
> Skip to the end of response streams
> 
> ==
> 
> The deadline is
> 
>       Wednesday, 2nd February 2022 at 19:00 UTC.
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
>          [ ] +1 Approve the release
>          [ ]  0 Don't care
>          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> 
> 
> ==== Items in this release
> 
> ****
> 
> The main item in this release is the updated Fuseki UI thanks to work by 
> Bruno.
> 
> This can be tested by downloading 
> "org/apache/jena/apache-jena-fuseki/4.4.0/" zip or tar.gz from the 
> staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1050
> 
> ****
> 
> As general maintenance for the project:
> 
> Apache log4j is at 2.17.1
> Apache Lucene: is updated to 8.10.1 -> 8.11.1
> Titanium JSON-LD updated 1.1.0 -> 1.2.0
> 
> as well as all other dependences being checked for updates.
> 
> To get valid javadoc, the build was done with Java17 cross-compiling to 
> <release>11</release>. A dry-run with java11 was done to check that no 
> Java17 library calls had crept in.
> 
> The war file for Fuseki is no longer in the apache-jena-fuseki download. 
> Instead, it is available from the downloads page (links to be updated 
> when the release happens).
> 
> Proposed:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
> 
> The Fuseki war file does not work in Tomcat10 due to the javax->jakarta 
> switchover. In theory, the Tomcat provided converter should work.
> https://tomcat.apache.org/download-migration.cgi
> 
> 
> This release includes the version of the TDB2 xloader used to load 16.6B 
> triples (WikiData all) into TDB2 and loading truthy (6B) on modest 
> hardware. Thanks to Marco, Lorenz and Øyvind for running Wikidata load 
> trails.
> 
> Fuseki: serviceUpload is no longer added in a default configuration. 
> This is not SPARQL GSP. GSP (POST/PUT) does accept HTML file uploads as 
> well as POST/PUT by content-type.
> 
> ==== Release Vote
> 
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> Please download and test the proposed release.
> 
> Staging repository:
>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1050
> 
> Proposed dist/ area:
>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
> 
> Keys:
>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> 
> Git commit (browser URL):
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/582e4082ef
> 
> Git Commit Hash:
>    582e4082ef53012527e686dd46cbeeb4b364f5fe
> 
> Git Commit Tag:
>    jena-4.4.0
> 
> This vote will be open until at least
> 
>       Wednesday, 2nd February 2022 at 19:00 UTC.
> 
> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> for you, please email within the schedule above.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>        Andy
> 
> Checking:
> 
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
> + can the source archive be built?
>            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>            (both source and binary artifacts)?
> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?