Re: dev Digest 27 Oct 2015 01:21:05 -0000 Issue 726

["G. Ann Campbell" <an...@sonarsource.com>]

Ping @Lewis...



---
*G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
Product Owner
http://sonarsource.com

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi G. Ann,
>
> This is actually my fault and I should not have left the tests in this
> state.
> In the meantime I think that we should retain the testFailureIgnore boolean
> value as false as we want to know when something is broken.
>
> I'll try and have a look into the failing tests this week. Thank you very
> much for dropping in. Great to hear that you guys are doing large scale
> source code analysis with such attention to detail.
> Lewis
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM, <de...@gora.apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nemo SonarQube analysis of Gora
> > <http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/792699> has been failing
> since
> > 6
> > Oct. on this:
> >
> > Results :
> >
> > Failed tests:
> > testGetWithFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest):
> > expected:<null> but was:<Random Joe>
> >
> > Tests in error:
> >
> >
> testMemStoreDeleteByQueryFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest)
> >
> >
> > Build fails in the Core module.
> >
> > Note that our SOP is to build with -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true.
> > However, the main pom sets <testFailureIgnore>false</testFailureIgnore>
> on
> > line 490, so these test failures must be resolved before we can analyze.
> >
> >
> > Help?
> > Ann
> >
> >
> > ---
> > *G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
> > Product Owner
> > http://sonarsource.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>