Currently I'm using the standard combination junit, htmlunit, and mock objects to test my code but I was wondering how much success people have had with things like jython or groovy for streamline test writing. i mean, my tests are already pretty minimal due to refactoring and such but has anyone seen any real improvement using other tools? -- Dan Adams Software Engineer Interactive Factory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
This is pretty useful http://selenium.thoughtworks.com/index.html On 23/11/05, Paul Field <pa...@db.com> wrote: > > > There are some alternatives to JUnit that do similar things but offer > enhanced functionality: > JTiger: http://www.jtiger.org/ > TestNG: http://www.testng.org/ > > There's a comparison here: > http://www.antwerkz.com/antwerkz/articles/testing/index.jsp > > However, JUnit is quietly in development and JUnit 4, when it's released, > will have many of the features that these alternative frameworks have > introduced. > > > If you are working closely with users (or user representatives) then take > a look at Fit ( http://fit.c2.com/ ) and FitNesse ( > http://www.fitnesse.org/ ) - these are like JUnit for business people > :-) Your users can write test cases as tables of input data and expected > outputs either in a Wiki or their favourite Microsoft Office tools. Great > for those of you doing agile/XP-style collaboration with end-users as you > end up doing a form of test-driven specification. > > Paul > > ------------------ > Paul Field > Global Markets Research IT > Deutsche Bank > > > > > Dan Adams <da...@ifactory.com> > > 23/11/2005 > 15:04 To > Tapestry > users <ta...@jakarta.apache.org> > > cc > > Please respond to > "Tapestry > users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org> > Subject > [OT] > Favorite testing tools > > > > > > > > > > > Currently I'm using the standard combination junit, htmlunit, and mock > objects to test my code but I was wondering how much success people have > had with things like jython or groovy for streamline test writing. i > mean, my tests are already pretty minimal due to refactoring and such > but has anyone seen any real improvement using other tools? > > -- > Dan Adams > Software Engineer > Interactive Factory > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you > are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) > please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this > e-mail is strictly forbidden. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > -- d-_-b \m/(>_<)\m/ (9ò_ó)-o(@_o)
There are some alternatives to JUnit that do similar things but offer enhanced functionality:
JTiger: http://www.jtiger.org/
TestNG: http://www.testng.org/
There's a comparison here: http://www.antwerkz.com/antwerkz/articles/testing/index.jsp
However, JUnit is quietly in development and JUnit 4, when it's released, will have many of the features that these alternative frameworks have introduced.
If you are working closely with users (or user representatives) then take a look at Fit ( http://fit.c2.com/ ) and FitNesse ( http://www.fitnesse.org/ ) - these are like JUnit for business people :-) Your users can write test cases as tables of input data and expected outputs either in a Wiki or their favourite Microsoft Office tools. Great for those of you doing agile/XP-style collaboration with end-users as you end up doing a form of test-driven specification.
Paul
------------------
Paul Field
Global Markets Research IT
Deutsche Bank
Dan Adams <da...@ifactory.com>
23/11/2005 15:04 To
Tapestry users <ta...@jakarta.apache.org>
cc
Please respond to
"Tapestry users" <ta...@jakarta.apache.org> Subject
[OT] Favorite testing tools
Currently I'm using the standard combination junit, htmlunit, and mock
objects to test my code but I was wondering how much success people have
had with things like jython or groovy for streamline test writing. i
mean, my tests are already pretty minimal due to refactoring and such
but has anyone seen any real improvement using other tools?
--
Dan Adams
Software Engineer
Interactive Factory
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
--
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Take a glance at TheGrinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Jython drives the tests and writing script skeleton is extremely easy: just start TheGrinder proxy and start browsing the target site done. http://grinder.sourceforge.net/g3/tcpproxy.html Please see description of my experience here: http://sandbox.sourcelabs.com/kosta/web_ui_compare/readme/tests/technology.html --- Dan Adams <da...@ifactory.com> wrote: > Currently I'm using the standard combination junit, > htmlunit, and mock > objects to test my code but I was wondering how much > success people have > had with things like jython or groovy for streamline > test writing. i > mean, my tests are already pretty minimal due to > refactoring and such > but has anyone seen any real improvement using other > tools? > > -- > Dan Adams > Software Engineer > Interactive Factory > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > Konstantin Ignatyev PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen million tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of tropical rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate between forty to one hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil, add 2,700 tons of CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population by 263,000 Bowers, C.A. The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement Needs a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools. New York: State University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org