You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at> on 2008/06/13 15:46:57 UTC
[exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Hi folks,
according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
commons-exec to commons proper?!
The current state of the commons-exec
(http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
+) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
the karma to mess up the project ... :-)
+) I officially took over the code in November 2007
+) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
tests
+) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
+) removed commons-logging dependency
+) added a few more features plus regression tests
+) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
various platforms and JVMs (see
http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
+) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
+) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
community
+) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
The not so good things
+) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
OpenVMS - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
+) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
....
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
+1
>
> The current state of the commons-exec
> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>
> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
> the karma to mess up the project ... :-)
> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
> tests
> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
> +) removed commons-logging dependency
> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
> various platforms and JVMs (see
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
> community
> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>
> The not so good things
>
> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
> OpenVMS - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
> ....
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Good idea ...
Siegfried Goeschl
James Carman wrote:
> For stuff like MapUtils and StringUtils, I'd probably place a comment
> in there that these are not intended to be part of the public API and
> could change without warning.
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>
>> The current state of the commons-exec
>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>
>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the
>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>> tests
>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various
>> platforms and JVMs (see
>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>> community
>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>
>> The not so good things
>>
>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS
>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>> ....
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
For stuff like MapUtils and StringUtils, I'd probably place a comment
in there that these are not intended to be part of the public API and
could change without warning.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>
> The current state of the commons-exec
> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>
> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the
> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
> tests
> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
> +) removed commons-logging dependency
> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various
> platforms and JVMs (see
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
> community
> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>
> The not so good things
>
> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS
> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
> ....
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 6/13/08, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip/>
>
> We have other components with only one active person so IMO its not a
> blocker. For me I would hope there is an intention on your part to
> stick around and support it - I'm not looking for any kind of promise,
> since none of us know what the future holds and were all volunteers
> that can disappear at any time - but I would be happier (voting to
> promote) if I knew the intention was there.
>
<snap/>
Likewise.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> I only have the same response I wrote six months ago ... :-)
>
> +) I can't make any promises but commons-exec is small enough to be
> maintained in the small hours when the family is asleep
> +) I'm not expecting a huge user base - it's too late for that since many
> in-house libraries are already used
> +) I'm not expecting many bugs because the original ANT while not perfect is
> still a solid foundation
> +) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might
> provide additional support if needed
Not sure whether this thread is a vote or not - but +1 from me to
promoting exec out of the sandbox to *proper*
Niall
> And I still think that commons-exec is a valuable addition to commons proper
> because it is hard to write such a component running on various OS/JVM
> installations ...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
>> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>>
>>> The current state of the commons-exec
>>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>>
>>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
>>> the
>>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>>> tests
>>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
>>> various
>>> platforms and JVMs (see
>>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>>> community
>>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>>
>>> The not so good things
>>>
>>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
>>> OpenVMS
>>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>>
>>
>> It sounds like exec is pretty much ready to start thinking about a
>> release? If thats the case then we should be promoting it (if not then
>> theres not much point in moving out of the Sandbox IMO).
>>
>> We have other components with only one active person so IMO its not a
>> blocker. For me I would hope there is an intention on your part to
>> stick around and support it - I'm not looking for any kind of promise,
>> since none of us know what the future holds and were all volunteers
>> that can disappear at any time - but I would be happier (voting to
>> promote) if I knew the intention was there.
>>
>> Niall
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>
>>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>>> ....
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
You will be the primary support for OpenVMS ... :-)
Siegfried Goeschl
sebb wrote:
> On 17/06/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> +) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might
>>>
>> > provide additional support if needed
>>
>>
>> I'm certainly one of those.
>>
>>
>
> Likewise, I can probably provide some support.
>
>
>> /niklas
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 17/06/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
>
> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>
> > +) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might
> > provide additional support if needed
>
>
> I'm certainly one of those.
>
Likewise, I can probably provide some support.
> /niklas
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>> +) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might
>> provide additional support if needed
>
> I'm certainly one of those.
I guess I'm the other one! :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> +) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might
> provide additional support if needed
I'm certainly one of those.
/niklas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi Niall,
I only have the same response I wrote six months ago ... :-)
+) I can't make any promises but commons-exec is small enough to be
maintained in the small hours when the family is asleep
+) I'm not expecting a huge user base - it's too late for that since
many in-house libraries are already used
+) I'm not expecting many bugs because the original ANT while not
perfect is still a solid foundation
+) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and
might provide additional support if needed
And I still think that commons-exec is a valuable addition to commons
proper because it is hard to write such a component running on various
OS/JVM installations ...
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>
>> The current state of the commons-exec
>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>
>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the
>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>> tests
>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various
>> platforms and JVMs (see
>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>> community
>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>
>> The not so good things
>>
>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS
>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>
>
> It sounds like exec is pretty much ready to start thinking about a
> release? If thats the case then we should be promoting it (if not then
> theres not much point in moving out of the Sandbox IMO).
>
> We have other components with only one active person so IMO its not a
> blocker. For me I would hope there is an intention on your part to
> stick around and support it - I'm not looking for any kind of promise,
> since none of us know what the future holds and were all volunteers
> that can disappear at any time - but I would be happier (voting to
> promote) if I knew the intention was there.
>
> Niall
>
>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>> ....
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>
> The current state of the commons-exec
> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>
> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the
> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
> tests
> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
> +) removed commons-logging dependency
> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various
> platforms and JVMs (see
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
> community
> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>
> The not so good things
>
> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS
> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
It sounds like exec is pretty much ready to start thinking about a
release? If thats the case then we should be promoting it (if not then
theres not much point in moving out of the Sandbox IMO).
We have other components with only one active person so IMO its not a
blocker. For me I would hope there is an intention on your part to
stick around and support it - I'm not looking for any kind of promise,
since none of us know what the future holds and were all volunteers
that can disappear at any time - but I would be happier (voting to
promote) if I knew the intention was there.
Niall
> Thanks in advance
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
> ....
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
1.5.0_15
2008/6/18 Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>:
> Hi Brett,
>
> which java version was being used so I can update the test matrix ...
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
>>
>> My results:
>>
>> Time: 49.106
>>
>> OK (55 tests)
>>
>> -bash-3.00$ uname -a
>> SunOS maven.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_127128-11 i86pc i386 i86pc
>>
>> Thanks for all your work on this!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> 2008/6/14 Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> that was quick ... :-)
>>>
>>> +) any Solaris version would do
>>> +) the standalone tests suite is here :
>>> http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>
>>> James Carman wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
>>>> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
>>>> test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
>>>> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> according to
>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>>>>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>>>>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>>>>
>>>>> The current state of the commons-exec
>>>>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>>>>
>>>>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
>>>>> the
>>>>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>>>>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>>>>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including
>>>>> regression
>>>>> tests
>>>>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>>>>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>>>>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>>>>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
>>>>> various
>>>>> platforms and JVMs (see
>>>>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>>>>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>>>>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>>>>> community
>>>>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>>>>
>>>>> The not so good things
>>>>>
>>>>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
>>>>> OpenVMS
>>>>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>>>>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>
>>>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be
>>>>> available
>>>>> ....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Brett Porter
Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi Brett,
which java version was being used so I can update the test matrix ...
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
Brett Porter wrote:
> My results:
>
> Time: 49.106
>
> OK (55 tests)
>
> -bash-3.00$ uname -a
> SunOS maven.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_127128-11 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
> Thanks for all your work on this!
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> 2008/6/14 Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>:
>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> that was quick ... :-)
>>
>> +) any Solaris version would do
>> +) the standalone tests suite is here :
>> http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>> James Carman wrote:
>>
>>> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
>>> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
>>> test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
>>> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>>>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>>>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>>>
>>>> The current state of the commons-exec
>>>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>>>
>>>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
>>>> the
>>>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>>>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>>>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>>>> tests
>>>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>>>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>>>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>>>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
>>>> various
>>>> platforms and JVMs (see
>>>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>>>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>>>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>>>> community
>>>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>>>
>>>> The not so good things
>>>>
>>>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
>>>> OpenVMS
>>>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>>>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>>
>>>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
My results:
Time: 49.106
OK (55 tests)
-bash-3.00$ uname -a
SunOS maven.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_127128-11 i86pc i386 i86pc
Thanks for all your work on this!
Cheers,
Brett
2008/6/14 Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>:
> Hi James,
>
> that was quick ... :-)
>
> +) any Solaris version would do
> +) the standalone tests suite is here :
> http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> James Carman wrote:
>>
>> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
>> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
>> test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
>> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>>
>>> The current state of the commons-exec
>>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>>
>>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
>>> the
>>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>>> tests
>>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
>>> various
>>> platforms and JVMs (see
>>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>>> community
>>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>>
>>> The not so good things
>>>
>>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
>>> OpenVMS
>>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>
>>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>>> ....
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Brett Porter
Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Well, the machine I setup was an Intel-based machine (pentium 4 I
believe), just for playing around with Solaris. This seems like a
quick way to get started playing with Solaris! :) It's got JDK1.5 on
it right now I believe. I'll try to run the tests tonight when I get
home. Or, you could use the "zone" Brett mentioned. Just let me
know.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> that was quick ... :-)
>
> +) any Solaris version would do
> +) the standalone tests suite is here :
> http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> James Carman wrote:
>>
>> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
>> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
>> test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
>> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>>
>>> The current state of the commons-exec
>>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>>
>>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
>>> the
>>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>>> tests
>>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
>>> various
>>> platforms and JVMs (see
>>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>>> community
>>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>>
>>> The not so good things
>>>
>>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
>>> OpenVMS
>>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>
>>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>>> ....
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi James,
that was quick ... :-)
+) any Solaris version would do
+) the standalone tests suite is here :
http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
James Carman wrote:
> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
> test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>
>> The current state of the commons-exec
>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>
>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the
>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>> tests
>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various
>> platforms and JVMs (see
>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>> community
>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>
>> The not so good things
>>
>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS
>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>> ....
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
We also have a zone (Solaris on intel) that can be used to test it.
2008/6/13 James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>:
> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
> test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>
>> The current state of the commons-exec
>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>
>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the
>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>> tests
>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various
>> platforms and JVMs (see
>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>> community
>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>
>> The not so good things
>>
>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS
>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>> ....
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Brett Porter
Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>
> The current state of the commons-exec
> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>
> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have the
> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
> tests
> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
> +) removed commons-logging dependency
> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on various
> platforms and JVMs (see
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
> community
> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>
> The not so good things
>
> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on OpenVMS
> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
> ....
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
As someone partially to blame for the code, +1 for moving to proper
and getting a release out.
/niklas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>
> I would be very happy to see Exec promoted and released.
Me too! I wrote a little helper to do execs a while back and I wish I
knew about this API then.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper
Posted by Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr>.
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
I would be very happy to see Exec promoted and released.
Luc
>
> The current state of the commons-exec
> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>
> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
> the karma to mess up the project ... :-)
> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
> tests
> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
> +) removed commons-logging dependency
> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
> various platforms and JVMs (see
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
> community
> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>
> The not so good things
>
> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
> OpenVMS - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
> ....
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org