You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID> on 2017/07/03 13:56:29 UTC
[DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance
branch?
Hi folks!
As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new Meecrowave release.
I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not much is open.
LieGrue,
strub
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-06 12:00 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> I think we should release OWB-1.7.4 first (because of the proxy bug with
> handling signed jars) and then ship MW-1.0.0.
>
> Wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 04.07.2017 um 15:32 schrieb Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> >
> > fyi @MEECROWAVE-50:
> > it works with the latest snapshot
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-07-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> >
> >> hi romain,
> >>
> >> it should be possible to reproduce it with any demo, however, you could
> >> use e.g. [1].
> >> (it uses v0.3.1, but also v0.3.2-SNAPSHOT only works on linux.)
> >> maybe it's something simple (i haven't checked the details so far), but
> >> there shouldn't be a different behavior across platforms...
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> gerhard
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/os890/meecrowave_template_jax-rs_cdi_jpa
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-07-04 11:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> @Gerhard: have the simple-demo somewhere on github? will try to
> resetup my
> >>> win box in the week
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>>
> >>> 2017-07-04 11:08 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> >>>
> >>>> imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
> >>>> -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).
> >>>>
> >>>> regards,
> >>>> gerhard
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to
> >>> include
> >>>> in
> >>>>> since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> >>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> >>>>> rmannibucau> |
> >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> >>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> >:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> >>>>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> >>>>>> rmannibucau> |
> >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE
> >>> Factory
> >>>>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> >>> <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi folks!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a
> >>> new
> >>>>>>>> Meecrowave release.
> >>>>>>>> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair
> >>> not
> >>>>> much
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> open.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance
branch?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
I think we should release OWB-1.7.4 first (because of the proxy bug with handling signed jars) and then ship MW-1.0.0.
Wdyt?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 04.07.2017 um 15:32 schrieb Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>
> fyi @MEECROWAVE-50:
> it works with the latest snapshot
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2017-07-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>
>> hi romain,
>>
>> it should be possible to reproduce it with any demo, however, you could
>> use e.g. [1].
>> (it uses v0.3.1, but also v0.3.2-SNAPSHOT only works on linux.)
>> maybe it's something simple (i haven't checked the details so far), but
>> there shouldn't be a different behavior across platforms...
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/os890/meecrowave_template_jax-rs_cdi_jpa
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-07-04 11:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> @Gerhard: have the simple-demo somewhere on github? will try to resetup my
>>> win box in the week
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>>>
>>> 2017-07-04 11:08 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
>>>> -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> gerhard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to
>>> include
>>>> in
>>>>> since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
>>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE
>>> Factory
>>>>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
>>> <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a
>>> new
>>>>>>>> Meecrowave release.
>>>>>>>> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair
>>> not
>>>>> much
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> open.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
fyi @MEECROWAVE-50:
it works with the latest snapshot
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> hi romain,
>
> it should be possible to reproduce it with any demo, however, you could
> use e.g. [1].
> (it uses v0.3.1, but also v0.3.2-SNAPSHOT only works on linux.)
> maybe it's something simple (i haven't checked the details so far), but
> there shouldn't be a different behavior across platforms...
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] https://github.com/os890/meecrowave_template_jax-rs_cdi_jpa
>
>
>
> 2017-07-04 11:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
>> @Gerhard: have the simple-demo somewhere on github? will try to resetup my
>> win box in the week
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>>
>> 2017-07-04 11:08 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>>
>> > imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
>> > -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > gerhard
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to
>> include
>> > in
>> > > since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>> > > rmannibucau> |
>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
>> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>> > >
>> > > 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>> > >
>> > > > 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
>> > > >
>> > > > LieGrue,
>> > > > strub
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > > > >:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> > > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>> > > > rmannibucau> |
>> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE
>> Factory
>> > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
>> <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
>> > >:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Hi folks!
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a
>> new
>> > > > >> Meecrowave release.
>> > > > >> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair
>> not
>> > > much
>> > > > is
>> > > > >> open.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> LieGrue,
>> > > > >> strub
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
hi romain,
it should be possible to reproduce it with any demo, however, you could use
e.g. [1].
(it uses v0.3.1, but also v0.3.2-SNAPSHOT only works on linux.)
maybe it's something simple (i haven't checked the details so far), but
there shouldn't be a different behavior across platforms...
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/os890/meecrowave_template_jax-rs_cdi_jpa
2017-07-04 11:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> @Gerhard: have the simple-demo somewhere on github? will try to resetup my
> win box in the week
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuca
> u> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2017-07-04 11:08 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
>
> > imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
> > -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to
> include
> > in
> > > since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >
> > > 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> > >
> > > > 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE
> Factory
> > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi folks!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new
> > > > >> Meecrowave release.
> > > > >> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not
> > > much
> > > > is
> > > > >> open.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> LieGrue,
> > > > >> strub
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@Gerhard: have the simple-demo somewhere on github? will try to resetup my
win box in the week
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
2017-07-04 11:08 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>:
> imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
> -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to include
> in
> > since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >
> > 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> >
> > > 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >
> > > > Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > >
> > > > 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> >:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi folks!
> > > >>
> > > >> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new
> > > >> Meecrowave release.
> > > >> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not
> > much
> > > is
> > > >> open.
> > > >>
> > > >> LieGrue,
> > > >> strub
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
-> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to include in
> since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>
> > 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >
> > > 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> > >
> > >> Hi folks!
> > >>
> > >> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new
> > >> Meecrowave release.
> > >> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not
> much
> > is
> > >> open.
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to include in
since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >
> > 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> >
> >> Hi folks!
> >>
> >> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new
> >> Meecrowave release.
> >> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not much
> is
> >> open.
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance
branch?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new
>> Meecrowave release.
>> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not much is
>> open.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Hi folks!
>
> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new
> Meecrowave release.
> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not much is
> open.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>