You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@fineract.apache.org by "Michael Vorburger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/05 09:43:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (FINERACT-1175) Fix spm.repository / spm.domain JPA bug (?), and simplify appContext.xml

Michael Vorburger created FINERACT-1175:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: Fix spm.repository / spm.domain JPA bug (?), and simplify appContext.xml
                 Key: FINERACT-1175
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1175
             Project: Apache Fineract
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
            Assignee: Michael Vorburger


While I was working on FINERACT-1127, I've noticed that appContext.xml individually lists 10+ packages.. why not just use org.apache.fineract.** ?

There is also a fineract-provider/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring/spmContext.xml, which seems weird.. why is that, and only that, in a separate file, instead of listed in appContext.xml? Would seem more consistent to have all in one.

Most importantly, perhaps, the {{<jpa:repositories base-package="org.apache.fineract.spm.repository"/>}} in spmContext.xml seems inconsistent with appContext.xml.. shouldn't that be {{org.apache.fineract.spm.domain}}, instead? Or are the other ones wrong? (And this is another reason why having them all together in a single place seems easier, to see differences.)

[~ptuomola] [~aleks] do you perhaps have any thoughts about this?

[~xurror] ([~kaze] ?) I'm not sure if this is something that particularly interests you, in the context of the OpenJPA to EclipseLink migration, but I thought I would just mention it here FYI, and on the off chance that this is causing you any issues during that project.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)