You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/31 12:59:26 UTC
Support for upgrades from 0.94
Hi,
this is referring to these two issues:
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8778>
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11611>
I'm still looking for deprecated stuff that can be cleaned up. We have a
file in the code (FSTableDescriptorMigrationToSubdir) that is used to
migrate pre-0.96 table format to the new version. It has an annotation that
marks it as to-delete for the next major version after 0.96.
HBASE-11611 removed the class UpgradeTo96 without removing the hbase shell
command "upgrade" which referred to that class. So that means that as of
2.0.0 upgrades from 0.94 are not supported anymore (If I understand that
correctly).
Are we okay with that? If so I'd like to create a JIRA removing the
remnants and documenting this.
Otherwise we need to partially revert HBASE-11611 and probably adapt the
Upgrade class.
Cheers,
Lars
Re: Support for upgrades from 0.94
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
Just FYI. Tracking this in <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14193>
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great, thanks Lars. I'll go ahead and will try to clean this up then.
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:33 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Following our guidelines as stated here:
>> https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning we can remove the
>> upgrade path from 2.0.Considering the 0.98 is a major version step over
>> 0.94 we could in theory remove such from 1.x, but we only established
>> semantic versioning with 1.0.0.
>> So, yes, it seems we can (and I would argue, should) remove the upgrade
>> code in question from 2.x.
>> -- Lars
>>
>> From: Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:59 AM
>> Subject: Support for upgrades from 0.94
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is referring to these two issues:
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8778>
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11611>
>>
>> I'm still looking for deprecated stuff that can be cleaned up. We have a
>> file in the code (FSTableDescriptorMigrationToSubdir) that is used to
>> migrate pre-0.96 table format to the new version. It has an annotation
>> that
>> marks it as to-delete for the next major version after 0.96.
>>
>> HBASE-11611 removed the class UpgradeTo96 without removing the hbase shell
>> command "upgrade" which referred to that class. So that means that as of
>> 2.0.0 upgrades from 0.94 are not supported anymore (If I understand that
>> correctly).
>>
>> Are we okay with that? If so I'd like to create a JIRA removing the
>> remnants and documenting this.
>>
>> Otherwise we need to partially revert HBASE-11611 and probably adapt the
>> Upgrade class.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Support for upgrades from 0.94
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
Great, thanks Lars. I'll go ahead and will try to clean this up then.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:33 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> Following our guidelines as stated here:
> https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning we can remove the
> upgrade path from 2.0.Considering the 0.98 is a major version step over
> 0.94 we could in theory remove such from 1.x, but we only established
> semantic versioning with 1.0.0.
> So, yes, it seems we can (and I would argue, should) remove the upgrade
> code in question from 2.x.
> -- Lars
>
> From: Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:59 AM
> Subject: Support for upgrades from 0.94
>
> Hi,
>
> this is referring to these two issues:
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8778>
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11611>
>
> I'm still looking for deprecated stuff that can be cleaned up. We have a
> file in the code (FSTableDescriptorMigrationToSubdir) that is used to
> migrate pre-0.96 table format to the new version. It has an annotation that
> marks it as to-delete for the next major version after 0.96.
>
> HBASE-11611 removed the class UpgradeTo96 without removing the hbase shell
> command "upgrade" which referred to that class. So that means that as of
> 2.0.0 upgrades from 0.94 are not supported anymore (If I understand that
> correctly).
>
> Are we okay with that? If so I'd like to create a JIRA removing the
> remnants and documenting this.
>
> Otherwise we need to partially revert HBASE-11611 and probably adapt the
> Upgrade class.
>
> Cheers,
> Lars
>
>
>
>
Re: Support for upgrades from 0.94
Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.
Following our guidelines as stated here: https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning we can remove the upgrade path from 2.0.Considering the 0.98 is a major version step over 0.94 we could in theory remove such from 1.x, but we only established semantic versioning with 1.0.0.
So, yes, it seems we can (and I would argue, should) remove the upgrade code in question from 2.x.
-- Lars
From: Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:59 AM
Subject: Support for upgrades from 0.94
Hi,
this is referring to these two issues:
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8778>
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11611>
I'm still looking for deprecated stuff that can be cleaned up. We have a
file in the code (FSTableDescriptorMigrationToSubdir) that is used to
migrate pre-0.96 table format to the new version. It has an annotation that
marks it as to-delete for the next major version after 0.96.
HBASE-11611 removed the class UpgradeTo96 without removing the hbase shell
command "upgrade" which referred to that class. So that means that as of
2.0.0 upgrades from 0.94 are not supported anymore (If I understand that
correctly).
Are we okay with that? If so I'd like to create a JIRA removing the
remnants and documenting this.
Otherwise we need to partially revert HBASE-11611 and probably adapt the
Upgrade class.
Cheers,
Lars